Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Reading a couple at the moment


The Time Travellers Guide to Medieval England is a fine tome for anyone with the vaguest interst in social history. Pops lots of myths and humanises the past. Very readable and entertaining too.


ANd I've mentioned this elsewhere, but this masterly history of the misguided Soviet intervention in Afgahnistan is a must for anyone interested in current affairs. Well researched without being scholarly (it was written by the old Ambassador in Moscow) and enough anecdotes garnered from first hand interviews to make it a deeply human and sympathetic work.

How to be a woman - Caitlin Moran


Brilliant and funny.


On waxing: (Chapter 2 'I become furry')


"I can't believe we've got to a point where its basically costing us money to have a fanny. They're making us pay for maintenance and upkeep of our lulus, like they're a communal garden. It's a stealth tax. Fanny VAT. This is money we should be spending on THE ELECTRICITY BILL and CHEESE and BERETS. Instead, we're wasting it on making our Chihuahuas look like a skanky Lidl chicken breast. God DAMN you, mores-of-pornography-that-have-made-it-into-my-pants. GOD DAMN YOU."

Just finishing Agent Zigzag. The incredible true story of Eddie Chapman, a criminal turned double agent in the second world war. Ben Macintyre has trawlled meticulously through MI5 archives to tell his story.


I think MI5 said if the story was ficton, it would have rejected by editors as being unbelivable.


Thoroughly enjoyed it.

Funny you should mention editors. The most thought-provoking part of the book for me was whether Barrington-Ward was right not to print misinformation in The Times. Journalistic integrity (those were the days!) versus patriotism is an interesting moral dilemma.

Re El Pibe's last post and strange requests from publishers.


Having bought a couple of Richard Wiseman's books, I'm now on his mailing list. Last year he published a book in the UK called, Paranormality: Why we see what isn't there. The blurb on the back starts with the sentence:


"Professor Richard Wiseman is clear about one thing: paranormal phenomena don't exist."


Then there's the following endorsement:


"People are emotionally drawn to the supernatural. They actively want weird, spooky things to be true...Wiseman shows us a higher joy as he deftly skewers the paranormal charlatans, blows away the psychic fog and lets in the light of reason."

Richard Dawkins


A fairly clear stance you would think. Imagine his surprise then when the only offers he got from major US publishers were on condition he re-wrote the book to suggest ghosts were real and psychic powers actually existed. He ended up having to self publish on Amazon.

They are indeed.

I do find it weird when people say they like his Iain Banks books but not his Iain M Banks ones, as they're really missing out.


Mieville is just superb. He just keeps getting better.

His steampunkesque Bas-lag novels were entertaining if unfocussed, and then he flirted with being a new Gaimian with un-lundun and kraken, but he's really found a voice since then.

The City and the City was fantastic and am currently reading Embassytown which is one of the best books, leave alone sci-fi, I've read in years.


As a linguistics obsessive what's not to like in a novel about the nature of language and communication!!

I recently re-read Neuromancer and was re-blown away


As an old SF trufan, I second the endorsements of Ian M Banks and China Mieville.

El P's assessment of The City and the City and the Bas-Lag books is spot on, but Embassytown follows the Bas-Lag pattern IMO: he begins enthrallingly well, does China, but can't quite seem to work out how or when to finish. It's probably significant that The City and the City was one of his shortest and least Gothic books.


Polite note to Bon3yard - it's SF, never Sci-Fi!

  • 2 weeks later...

Finally finished Embassytown (I only get to read on my ten minute commute, assuming I don't bump into people, which is about 40% of the time) and have to disagree. I think, like City & the City, that he knew exactly where it was going.

I thought it his best book yet, reminiscent of the golden age of sci-fi, all about ideas, his hints at the exotic and alien nature of the world far more effective than the modern hard-sf/space opera trend for explaining everything.


I also like to think it's a book that people who'd ordinarily avoid SF could approach. The themes were very human, how and why do we communicate, how did language evolve, how vision and deceit are intertwined. It was also a great essay in societial reaction to existential threats, sketching impressions of Downfall Berlin but hinting at the ecological/end of fossil fuel stresses we face in future.


But it was the thoughts about language that really stand out*. My jaw dropped when he was talking about the universailty of thatness in language as my two year old is expressing everything in those terms. Pibi?o expressing complex thoughts come out as *points* "pibi?o's this one, pibi?o's not this one" as he can understand much but fumbling toward the faculties necessary to express it, just like the ariekine on realising they share unspoken thought.


Anyway I drivel on. Consider this one recommended.


*admittedly he muses more towards the end and the pacing dropped a bit, perhaps that's why you thought he was doing his bas-lag meandering.

I read Embassytown at one go while in bed with flu... afraid that I was not in the best of conditions to appreciate the thatness of anything! I still think that the later battle scenes were a bit... over-long, shall we say?


But I agree that a lot of tedious stuff is passed off as SF these days. It seems to be sold by the pound as well - where have all the editors gone? Although you must admit that a nice bit of noir-ish cyberpunk once in a while is good fun - Richard Morgan or early Walter Jon Williams, say.

Fair point about the battles, you were rather mentally hurrying him to the denoument!


I do love stood bit of cyberpunk, I grew up with William Gibson. Am trying snowcrash. I've read some of Neal Stephenson's stuff, another chap with ideas everywhere but struggles with plot and pace. So far Cryptonomicon was his best novel that I've read. anathema was a bit clunking in its allegory but I enjoyed it nevertheless. I do like the fact that Snowcrash looks thin after his other tomes!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello. Would you like a sofa bed? We have one to give away…photos attached. The scatter cushions are not included.
    • Complaint submitted.  Your helpful link took me straight to the relevant page. 🙏
    • I spend a riddiculous amount of time at the PO.  Every day.  I watch and I watch closely.  Returns take seconds.  The wait might be long but the scan takes a second.  The only thing that slows down a return is people scrolling through their phones looking for QR codes. Business customers like me take seconds.  I might have up to 2 bags of boxes but every one is perfectly packaged and pre-paid.  It just needs a scan.  Seconds. For customers like me and for returns customers they could just put in a self-service check out and we would all be in and out in minutes.  Quicker than M&S.   Or, have a dedicated window for scanning and nothing else.  No facility to handle money at that window so nobody is tempted to ask for a service other than scanning.  That would get the queues down instantly. It is the people picking up things that backs up the queue.  The branch is not equipped to provide the service.  Next time you're in the branch take a look at the shelf space immediately behind the servers.  A few stacking shelves.  That's all the space they have.  Everything else is on the floor in a mess.  I take on board what someone said about the private delivery companies not delivering to Peckham and I didn't know that.   The biggest time wasting service of all is Parcelforce.  If someone in front of me asks for Parcelforce I want to cry.  Long, long, forms need to be filled out by hand, in triplicate.  It is Dickensian.   Please consider taking a few minutes to fill out an online complaint (link below).  I honestly believe that an influx of complaints might make a difference.  I don't want to demoralise the staff or anything sinister but the PO needs to see that the branch is broken. https://www.postoffice.co.uk/contact-us/in-branch-customer-experience    
    • Couldn't agree more with the frustration. I avoid it like the plague but made the mistake of picking up a parcel a couple of months ago and it took them 20 minutes to find it. This was after queuing for an hour. All the pickup parcels were just in a massive heap with no order or organisation so they manually had to search for everything. Bizarre and deeply annoying as if run well it could be a good asset to the Post Office and of course the community. Also, very much agree with the point re not taking it out on counter staff as it must be a terrible and demoralising environment to work in.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...