Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"Last week I read:- We Really Must Talk About Kevin - Lionel Shriver"


You mentioned this in relation to El Pibi?o's penchant for meat art, I had a quick google and it looked intriguing enough.

Recommend?


For the record Pibi?o makes stuff out of anything and everything, a stool was an aeroplane, a cone his seatbelt and a shop receipt the newspaper the lady gives you, it was unfortunate there just happened to be some kidney to hand at that moment ;)

Sunnyside by Glen David Gold - a kind of multi-episodic sprawling narrative type revolving around Chaplain, Pickford and Fairbanks et al. with seemingly unrelated elements like lighthouse keepers and wild west shows performing for the Kaiser coming together through the Liberty Loans campaign of future presidential candidate William G McAdoo.


only halfway through it though so it could end up being about something else entirely - it's that kind of book.

  • 4 weeks later...

Jiri Weil's Mendelssohn is on the Roof.


First impressions are that this is excellent; there are things about it that bring to mind Catch 22 a little bit. As this was published 6 years beforehand I wonder if it had some influence over Heller's own work.


---


hmm, given it wasn't translated til the nineties this is unlikely. Anyway, recommended.

For anyone who likes a good page turner thriller, Linwood Barclay is my new favourite. Just finished "Trust your eyes" which has quite a good back story where a crime is caught on camera by an internet mapping camera (like Google streetview, but called something different in the book).


I have just started my first ever Robert Goddard book after my wife got me 10 of his novels cheap from the book people. Only a few pages in, but seems okay so far, and a couple of people at work tell me they're fun.

  • 4 weeks later...

I've just finished Ready Player One.

One reviewer desxcribed it as a nerdgasm, which is about right.

It's very silly, but as a child of the eighties a book obsessed with bad hair, John Hughes films, blue monday, erin grey, godzilla, the dungeons and dragons cartoons, deloreans, coin op arcades and the Atari 2600 was right up my street.

  • 2 months later...

Just finished 'The Hundred-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out of the Window and Disappeared' by Jonas Jonasson.


A very sweet and funny book translated from the Swedish original.


difficult to describe but if it was made into a film it would be a combination of 'Up' and 'Forrest Gump' and would be directed by the Coen brothers.

  • 7 months later...

reading Marc Morris' The Norman Conquest.


Very good, well worth it and makes you realise how little we were taught about this period bar the headline soundbites (most of which are simplistic, dubious, misleading or plain myth).


The first hundred pages provides fascinating insight into the background.

I did find lots of references to Cnut and Harthacnut constantly gave a jolt gievn waht we konw abuot how we inerrptet wodrs on the paeg

Ah, no, that's called "Doctor Sleep". Heard mised reviews on Radio 4 review show.


11.22.63 sounds good. Reminds me of a film I say years ago called Running against time, where they try to stop JFK getting killed, thinking it would have stopped the Vietnam war. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100529/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl It was probably rubbish, but I remember it being good.

He was pretty instrumental in escalating the conflict, so seems a dubious conclusion to come to.


I've a very interesting diplomatic and policy history of the war, much of it based upon transcripts of declassified conversations, many of them in the oval office itself.


Basically it boiled down to 3 presidents in a row thinking the war was a very bad idea but each one thinking it had to pursue it in the first term in order to extricate themselves in the second term; political posturing for domestic consumption.


President 1 died, 2 retired and 3 did what he said.

All told that involved keeping a war going for votes 10 years longer than necessary.


We'll never know if Kennedy would have managed to extricate the US from the conflict, but given that withdrawal would have resulted in the overthrow of a client government by a communist insurgency, I can't see how he'd have done it any differently to Johnson.


Nixon certainly didn't achieve peace with honour and was probably responsible for the most killing by indiscriminate bombing, but he did finally say, ok we'll lose the war on my watch!!


A very interesting read if anyone wants borrowage (once I have it back from lendage)

.aaaanyway.


I'm partial to a bit of speculative hitory fiction.


I have C.J Sansom's Dominion (the usual in a long tradition of bad guys winning world war 2) ready to go, and from the blurb it seems to share some traits from Man in the High Castle and Fatherland, both of which I enjoyed.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He was pretty instrumental in escalating the

> conflict, so seems a dubious conclusion to come

> to.

>

> I've a very interesting diplomatic and policy

> history of the war, much of it based upon

> transcripts of declassified conversations, many of

> them in the oval office itself.

>

> Basically it boiled down to 3 presidents in a row

> thinking the war was a very bad idea but each one

> thinking it had to pursue it in the first term in

> order to extricate themselves in the second term;

> political posturing for domestic consumption.

>

> President 1 died, 2 retired and 3 did what he

> said.

> All told that involved keeping a war going for

> votes 10 years longer than necessary.

>

> We'll never know if Kennedy would have managed to

> extricate the US from the conflict, but given that

> withdrawal would have resulted in the overthrow of

> a client government by a communist insurgency, I

> can't see how he'd have done it any differently to

> Johnson.

>

> Nixon certainly didn't achieve peace with honour

> and was probably responsible for the most killing

> by indiscriminate bombing, but he did finally say,

> ok we'll lose the war on my watch!!

>

> A very interesting read if anyone wants borrowage

> (once I have it back from lendage)



Dude is was an early 90s made for TV movie. Don't overthink it man!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A A day-school for girls and a boarding school for boys (even with, by the late '90s, a tiny cadre of girls) are very different places.  Though there are some similarities. I think all schools, for instance, have similar "rules", much as they all nail up notices about "potential" and "achievement" and keeping to the left on the stairs. The private schools go a little further, banging on about "serving the public", as they have since they were set up (either to supply the colonies with District Commissioners, Brigadiers and Missionaries, or the provinces with railway engineers), so they've got the language and rituals down nicely. Which, i suppose, is what visitors and day-pupils expect, and are expected, to see. A boarding school, outside the cloistered hours of lesson-times, once the day-pupils and teaching staff have been sent packing, the gates and chapel safely locked and the brochures put away, becomes a much less ambassadorial place. That's largely because they're filled with several hundred bored, tired, self-supervised adolescents condemned to spend the night together in the flickering, dripping bowels of its ancient buildings, most of which were designed only to impress from the outside, the comfort of their occupants being secondary to the glory of whatever piratical benefactor had, in a last-ditch attempt to sway the judgement of their god, chucked a little of their ill-gotten at the alleged improvement of the better class of urchin. Those adolescents may, to the curious eyes of the outer world, seem privileged but, in that moment, they cannot access any outer world (at least pre-1996 or thereabouts). Their whole existence, for months at a time, takes place in uniformity behind those gates where money, should they have any to hand, cannot purchase better food or warmer clothing. In that peculiar world, there is no difference between the seventh son of a murderous sheikh, the darling child of a ball-bearing magnate, the umpteenth Viscount Smethwick, or the offspring of some hapless Foreign Office drone who's got themselves posted to Minsk. They are egalitarian, in that sense, but that's as far as it goes. In any place where rank and priviilege mean nothing, other measures will evolve, which is why even the best-intentioned of committees will, from time to time, spawn its cliques and launch heated disputes over archaic matters that, in any other context, would have long been forgotten. The same is true of the boarding school which, over the dismal centuries, has developed a certain culture all its own, with a language indended to pass all understanding and attitiudes and practices to match. This is unsurprising as every new intake will, being young and disoriented, eagerly mimic their seniors, and so also learn those words and attitudes and practices which, miserably or otherwise, will more accurately reflect the weight of history than the Guardian's style-guide and, to contemporary eyes and ears, seem outlandish, beastly and deplorably wicked. Which, of course, it all is. But however much we might regret it, and urge headteachers to get up on Sundays and preach about how we should all be tolerant, not kill anyone unnecessarily, and take pity on the oiks, it won't make the blindest bit of difference. William Golding may, according to psychologists, have overstated his case but I doubt that many 20th Century boarders would agree with them. Instead, they might look to Shakespeare, who cheerfully exploits differences of sex and race and belief and ability to arm his bullies, murderers, fraudsters and tyrants and remains celebrated to this day,  Admittedly, this is mostly opinion, borne only of my own regrettable experience and, because I had that experience and heard those words (though, being naive and small-townish, i didn't understand them till much later) and saw and suffered a heap of brutishness*, that might make my opinion both unfair and biased.  If so, then I can only say it's the least that those institutions deserve. Sure, the schools themselves don't willingly foster that culture, which is wholly contrary to everything in the brochures, but there's not much they can do about it without posting staff permanently in corridors and dormitories and washrooms, which would, I'd suggest, create a whole other set of problems, not least financial. So, like any other business, they take care of the money and keep aloof from the rest. That, to my mind, is the problem. They've turned something into a business that really shouldn't be a business. Education is one thing, raising a child is another, and limited-liability corporations, however charitable, tend not to make the best parents. And so, in retrospect, I'm inclined not to blame the students either (though, for years after, I eagerly read the my Old School magazine, my heart doing a little dance at every black-edged announcement of a yachting tragedy, avalanche or coup). They get chucked into this swamp where they have to learn to fend for themselves and so many, naturally, will behave like predators in an attempt to fit in. Not all, certainly. Some will keep their heads down and hope not to be noticed while others, if they have a particular talent, might find that it protects them. But that leaves more than enough to keep the toxic culture alive, and it is no surprise at all that when they emerge they appear damaged to the outside world. For that's exactly what they are. They might, and sometimes do, improve once returned to the normal stream of life if given time and support, and that's good. But the damage lasts, all the same, and isn't a reason to vote for them. * Not, if it helps to disappoint any lawyers, at Dulwich, though there's nothing in the allegations that I didn't instantly recognise, 
    • Another recommendation for Lorraine  - if you need help over the holidays, she still has a small amount of availability. Couldn’t recommend her more highly, she’s brilliant with our cat. Message her on 07718 752208 for more details re pricing etc.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...