Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It is called R v Brown and others. A group of consenting adults was caught (don't know how) doing various violent things to each others private parts. They had a password, so that they could yell out in pain, but the activity would carry on, but if they yelled the password it would stop. Various people in the party were charged with assault type charges (to be fair, not sure if anyone was actually charged with torture). The question up for consideration was whether a person can legally consent to that kind of assault - if they could it wouldn't be an assault. It was found that they could, but the poor chaps in question were still convicted - of offending public morals. Not sure what that adds to the debate really but when studing the case I had a jolly good chuckle at reading various barristers terribly serious submissions to the court of appeal about the true nature of nailing genitals to a plank.....
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6593-water-torture/#findComment-211301
Share on other sites

Convicted drug-dealers were they, or were the police just doing a raid?


Either way it's wrong but if they aren't even convicted and are just suspects that makes it worse x 10. Come on Jimmy even you know the police are human and make as many mistakes as the rest of us. They have forced their way into my flat at 3am in the morning and I don't really fancy being tortured onlyto be told it was a mistaken identity


Also, drug dealers may be a blight on society but without them a large number of forumites wouldn't function.... that doesn't make it right of course. Just saying

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6593-water-torture/#findComment-211312
Share on other sites

Yes Sean the Police do make mistakes, and the guys who were nicked in the raid may well of been innocent on this occasion and at the time they were allegedly tortured they were indeed only suspects. But you can bet your bottom dollar that they probably were drug dealers with previous convictions. And ok, so they may have served some negligible amount of time in the clink for those crimes. But you've got to admit, it puts a smile on your face to read the blighters suffered a bit on this occasion.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6593-water-torture/#findComment-211328
Share on other sites

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes Sean the Police do make mistakes, and the guys

> who were nicked in the raid may well of been

> innocent on this occasion and at the time they

> were allegedly tortured they were indeed only

> suspects. But you can bet your bottom dollar that

> they probably were drug dealers with previous

> convictions. And ok, so they may have served some

> negligible amount of time in the clink for those

> crimes. But you've got to admit, it puts a smile

> on your face to read the blighters suffered a bit

> on this occasion.


"If they didn't do this they did something similar".


I'm sure that causes some kind of facial expression but it isn't a smile.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6593-water-torture/#findComment-211334
Share on other sites

You probably aren't aware of it right now Jimmy but Sean is flexing and crunching his knuckles in preparation for his answer and will launch into it with all the passion and determination of a pianist. I can see him now, eye's closed, rolling his head from shoulder to shoulder............and he begins.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6593-water-torture/#findComment-211336
Share on other sites

No Jimmy - it doesn't. It might please members of the stasi tho..


I didn't realise some peolpe saw Judge Dread as a role model and not satire


And as for the piss-takers on this thread - that's YOUR drugs that are going to disappear as well as everyone elses human rights/dignity

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6593-water-torture/#findComment-211339
Share on other sites

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Drug dealing is also wrong. It's a blight on our

> society and the drug dealers just laugh at the

> pathetic sentences they get whilst they wreak

> havoc on our society. I'd have pulled their nails

> out with pliers as well.



so who are you gojng to start with first - Your mate the landlord of your local or the newsagent who also sells tobacco ?


*right kids*

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6593-water-torture/#findComment-211348
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
    • Hello! I'm looking for a talented, affordable people photographer to do headshots for my start up's website, for 4 people. If you're keen I'd love to see examples of your work please. Many thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...