Jump to content

Water torture


jimmy two times

Recommended Posts

I hate to rise to the bait, I really do, but I can't help it. JTT, that post makes me really sad. And not because I am a softy liberal type that thinks they deserve a jolly good telling off and some therapy. Torture is just wrong. Wrong wrong wrong. Always.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is called R v Brown and others. A group of consenting adults was caught (don't know how) doing various violent things to each others private parts. They had a password, so that they could yell out in pain, but the activity would carry on, but if they yelled the password it would stop. Various people in the party were charged with assault type charges (to be fair, not sure if anyone was actually charged with torture). The question up for consideration was whether a person can legally consent to that kind of assault - if they could it wouldn't be an assault. It was found that they could, but the poor chaps in question were still convicted - of offending public morals. Not sure what that adds to the debate really but when studing the case I had a jolly good chuckle at reading various barristers terribly serious submissions to the court of appeal about the true nature of nailing genitals to a plank.....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with your first two sentences. I have a sneaking suspicion that we aren't going to agree on much more. So i'll just say one more thing - this debate for me is the same as the death penalty debate.


It isn't about who they are. It's about who we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Convicted drug-dealers were they, or were the police just doing a raid?


Either way it's wrong but if they aren't even convicted and are just suspects that makes it worse x 10. Come on Jimmy even you know the police are human and make as many mistakes as the rest of us. They have forced their way into my flat at 3am in the morning and I don't really fancy being tortured onlyto be told it was a mistaken identity


Also, drug dealers may be a blight on society but without them a large number of forumites wouldn't function.... that doesn't make it right of course. Just saying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes Sean the Police do make mistakes, and the guys who were nicked in the raid may well of been innocent on this occasion and at the time they were allegedly tortured they were indeed only suspects. But you can bet your bottom dollar that they probably were drug dealers with previous convictions. And ok, so they may have served some negligible amount of time in the clink for those crimes. But you've got to admit, it puts a smile on your face to read the blighters suffered a bit on this occasion.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes Sean the Police do make mistakes, and the guys

> who were nicked in the raid may well of been

> innocent on this occasion and at the time they

> were allegedly tortured they were indeed only

> suspects. But you can bet your bottom dollar that

> they probably were drug dealers with previous

> convictions. And ok, so they may have served some

> negligible amount of time in the clink for those

> crimes. But you've got to admit, it puts a smile

> on your face to read the blighters suffered a bit

> on this occasion.


"If they didn't do this they did something similar".


I'm sure that causes some kind of facial expression but it isn't a smile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You probably aren't aware of it right now Jimmy but Sean is flexing and crunching his knuckles in preparation for his answer and will launch into it with all the passion and determination of a pianist. I can see him now, eye's closed, rolling his head from shoulder to shoulder............and he begins.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Drug dealing is also wrong. It's a blight on our

> society and the drug dealers just laugh at the

> pathetic sentences they get whilst they wreak

> havoc on our society. I'd have pulled their nails

> out with pliers as well.



so who are you gojng to start with first - Your mate the landlord of your local or the newsagent who also sells tobacco ?


*right kids*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Week 10 fixtures...   Saturday 2nd November Newcastle United v Arsenal AFC Bournemouth v Manchester City Ipswich Town v Leicester City Liverpool v Brighton & Hove Albion Nottingham Forest v West Ham United Southampton v Everton Wolverhampton Wanderers v Crystal Palace   Sunday 3rd November Tottenham Hotspur v Aston Villa Manchester United v Chelsea   Monday 4th November Fulham v Brentford
    • More interested in the future than the past. 
    • The plans The developer Berkeley Homes have submitted a planning application to redevelop the Aylesham Centre close to the junction of Peckham High Street and Rye Lane, containing Morrison’s supermarket, car park, & petrol station, Aylesham shopping arcade and most of that side of Rye Lane between Hanover Park and Peckham High Street. The application is for a mixed housing, retail, leisure and commercial development, in buildings ranging from 5 to 20 storeys. Impact Local people who have studied the detailed plans think that the development would dominate the historic town centre which has evolved since the 18th century, and would ruin the Conservation Area which was awarded in 2011 'to preserve and enhance its character and appearance'. More than 65% of the homes to be built in this unimaginative over-bearing development will be unaffordable by most people who live in Southwark, and provide inadequate open and green space for this part of Peckham. Need for discussion This is such an important issue for south London that it needs wide discussion before the Council Planning Committee takes its decision (not before next Spring). A free on-line talk and discussion to clarify the heritage issues we all need to think about is being held on Monday 11th November 7-8.30pm. All will be welcome. Please register on this link: https://Defend-Peckhams-Heritage-2024.eventbrite.co.uk There are several other key issues raised by the plans which are being examined in the Aylesham Community Action (ACA) campaign. You can find the link to all that and other useful information here: www.linktr.ee/acapeckham The zoom session is being arranged by Peckham Heritage the local group that has grown from the community work alongside the restoration of nine historic buildings in Peckham High Street through the Townscape Heritage Initiative. We hope that EDF members who value local heritage will be able to attend the session to hear and take part in the discussion, and report back to this topic so the discussion can continue.
    • I did see a few Victoria bound 185's on East Dulwich road around 5pm this evening. Coming from the Rye end and heading toward Goose green
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...