Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've never come across any evidence of the death sentence as an effective deterrent.


I remember watching a lorry load of forty something men in orange jumpsuits in Chongqing, China laughing and cheering as they zipped along in an army convoy. It transpired that they were off to be executed.


I was naturally surprised by their good humour, but my local colleague explained that most of them would have been convicted of pickpocketing western tourists, and the night before would have been the best night of their life as they dined out on the the thirty-odd quid in the stolen wallets.


Since they'd had such a great night out, they no longer had anything to aspire to. They were fulfilled.


It's worth noting the ten happiest societies:


1. Denmark

2. Switzerland

3. Austria

4. Iceland

5. The Bahamas

6. Finland

7. Sweden

8. Bhutan

9. Brunei

10. Canada


It doesn't coincide with the top 5 countries for executions:


1. China

2. Iran

3. Saudi Arabia

4. Pakistan

5. USA


Those five countries accounted for 93% of the world's executions.


I think the best argument against capital punishment or torture is an entirely selfish one. Perpetrating these acts against someone else poisons our own existence.


I'm sure they satisfy some sort of primal rapacious instinct, but we rein in our other instinctive destructive traits in favour of a better society, so I don't see why we shouldn't continue to do that with this issue too.


I can't believe that JTT is being entirely serious. We're surely not recommending that we allow the police to torture 'suspects'?


JTT does demonstrate how vulnerable liberal societies are to fear. The Stasi and the death camps aren't far behind a nod and a wink to the coppers. Tragic.

Er, aren't we now debating something different? Punishment is one thing but everyone and I mean EVERYONE has a right to a presumption of innocent until proved guilty and fair trail with legally gained evidence...torture doesn't fit in any of this EVER. Now punishment that's a whole different argument

I'm afraid *Bob* didn't invent the bamboo torture, although it may be apocryphal.


And bringing the Bahamas into it just isn't fair. How can we compete with that weather and those beaches?


Seriously though, the Bahamas is a really odd place with high levels of violent crime due to drug problems, and a really big affluence gap. It's completely normal to have bars on all your windows. The richest people are extraordinarily rich and usually white, and often not nationals, and live in gated communities. The poorest people are very poor and usually black and live in shacks. It amazes me that it made the top 10.

Singapore has the death sentence, and very little crime.


But it's fair to say that the two things aren't related. The low crime is a reflection of the cultural sense of responsibility that residents have to their society. There's a huge social pressure on people to contribute the family unit, the kampong and the country.


I think the drugs issue is a reflection of a breakdown in that perception on both sides. Taking recreational drugs that you have access to - in spite of the lives that a ruined on the other side of the globe as a consequence - is outrageous. It's just not funny. Users are criminals in more than just a legal sense.


But to 'torture' the suspects compounds the issue - it does more damage to our society and breaks the ties that bind us together. So this 'obvious' solution achieves exactly the opposite.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Taking

> recreational drugs that you have access to - in

> spite of the lives that a ruined on the other side

> of the globe as a consequence - is outrageous.

> It's just not funny. Users are criminals in more

> than just a legal sense.


Of course the same goes for food we eat, clothes we wear, where we go on holiday, our household furnishings and now - the money we borrow.


People are selfish in so many ways but always blind to their own selfishness.


In any case - as you well know, Huge, there's a swathe of recreational drugs which don't 'blight the other side of the globe', from things you can grow on your windowsill in a plant pot, to things you can buy on the internet, made legally in a factory - like shampoo. Essentially the greater the attempt to control, the greater the global blight.

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jimmy two times Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Why has this place gone to the dogs Sean?

> Because

> > some of us have views that are not as liberal

> as

> > yours ? Well I'll admit, I hate drug dealers. I

> > also hate Paedos. And I hate people who commit

> > random acts of violence for absolutely no

> reason

> > at all. And quite frankly I would not lose a

> wink

> > of sleep to know that these people were getting

> > all that's coming to them. Call it karma.

>

>

> I hate Nick Griffin, Paris Hilton and people who

> split their infinitives. Shall we kill them too?

> Or just lop off a limb?



YES YES YES TO PARIS HILTON!!

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sean you're right, I can't provide you with any

> examples of societies that have benefited from

> torture or capital punishment. I'm not armed with

> such stats on a daily basis. I'm sure if I was I

> could probably put some sort of spin on them to

> suggest that torture of criminals and enemies of

> the state and capital punishment do indeed create

> a better society. I'd imagine for one thing

> Britain in the 50s had less of a drug and crime

> problem then it does now, and capital punishment

> was still in force then.



You can make statstical cases that capital punishment deters crime, since Erlich in 1975 there have been dozens of studies which show that on average 8 murders are deterred for every execution that takes place.


However, it is the moral argument which is my objection to it.


As for torture, it is repellent in all forms and provides highly dubious information at best.

'Along with genocide, ethnic cleansing, capital punishment etc. All necessary evils?'

No Lozzyloz they are not all necessary evils. What I described was torture of captured spies or enemies to gain information that saved thousands of lives. That was a reality in the second world war, and indeed in most wars, even if you fail to acknowledge it. How can you possibly intimate that I would also classify genocide as a necessary evil?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
    • I cook at home - almost 95% of what we eat at home is cooked from scratch.  But eating out is more than just having dinner, it is socialising and doing something different. Also,sometimes it is nice to pay someone else to cook and clear up.
    • Yup Juan is amazing (and his partner can't remember her name!). Highly recommend the wine tastings.  Won't be going to the new chain.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...