Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What's all the fuss about? Thug assaults copper who has to be treated in hospital. He is either p**ed out of his head or high as a kite and won't calm down. Coppers taser him and give him a few digs to restrain him. He is subsequently arrested and charged with GBH. Job done in my opinion.;-)
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6671-police-use-tasers/
Share on other sites

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Last year I got sprayed with C.S gas outside the

> Coach and Horses pub in Lewisham by the old bill

> and it was incredibly painful. Looking back I

> suppose I deserved it.


Now BBW, stick to point, this is the taser thread, don't come on here swanking about your CS gassing.

When you've been electrocuted by the cozzers then come back.

But well done on accepting responsibility, have you straightened up and flown right since?

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Back when I was a kid I got hanged for being rude

> to the plod and it never did me any harm.


But since then you've straightened up and flown right, haven't you?

It was the only language you understood

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Please explain HonaloochieB. I'm assuming you're

> inferring that I am self righteous?


I don't know you but your posts have a certain smack of it about them.


Have a look at these, and you'll get an idea of what i'm getting at.






I'm not intolerant of the opinions of others, which is a big part of being self righteous. Everyone's entitled to them. I like this discussion forum but I'm often saddened by how personal people can get if they disagree with something. It can border on plain nasty at times. In one of the other threads I was called an 'idiot' by a very charming lady. She may be right, but it still wasn't very nice. I do wish people wouldn't say things in their postings that they wouldn't dream of saying to an individual's face.

AS I said JX2, I was referring to your posts and not nevessarily you.

But to start a thread aprpos of nothing with


"What's all the fuss about? Thug assaults copper who has to be treated in hospital. He is either p**ed out of his head or high as a kite and won't calm down. Coppers taser him and give him a few digs to restrain him. He is subsequently arrested and charged with GBH. Job done in my opinion".


And then to follow up with


"They've got a tough job to do and they have to use force at times".


It just put me in mind of the SRBs inasmuch as it seemed a little on the satirical side, that's all.

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not intolerant of the opinions of others,

> which is a big part of being self righteous.

> Everyone's entitled to them. I like this

> discussion forum but I'm often saddened by how

> personal people can get if they disagree with

> something. It can border on plain nasty at times.

> In one of the other threads I was called an

> 'idiot' by a very charming lady. She may be right,

> but it still wasn't very nice. I do wish people

> wouldn't say things in their postings that they

> wouldn't dream of saying to an individual's face.




You are an idiot. You know you are only trying to wind it up with this thread. I agree they do a difficult job but the accusation is that he was punched in the face on the floor, after being tasered he was then punched in the face four times. Crazy overuse of force that should be addressed by an inqury. "A Bit of a dig" is not a solution to the issue.


Probably should have been shot in your opinion I guess.


http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/107742/Captured-on-camera-Man-repeatedly-tasered-by-police

If you don't like bully's then why are you suggesting that Police Officers act in a bullying manner. I don't know how many police there are in the UK - I am guessing it is over 100,000.


Do you not think that when people witness this behaviour they will in turn think it is acceptable.


For old school I would substitute narrow minded and backward. I think you have jumped in saying something without thinking about it at all, and if you stopped to consider what you were saying then you would realise your argument is fundamentally flawed.

He had already committed GBH on another copper and he wasn't incapacitated. He was kicking out and struggling despite being told to stop. Also, so far you've called me an idiot, backward, narrow minded, a bully and a coward. I'm really biting my lip here because I don't like internet forum slanging matches so I'll kindly ask you to by all means engage in debate with me til the cows come home ,but stop with the personal insults.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The editing was clumsy and made it look like he said something specific, that he did not. That is obviously wrong, and the BBC have apologised and people have lost their jobs as a result. That said, the overall impression - that Trump repeatedly stated (and still does) that the election had been stolen, that he encouraged his supporters to march on the Capitol, that he repeatedly called for people to fight - in short that he inspired a violent insurrection - is entirely true.  Trump used the word 'fight' 20 times. Whilst his speech was going on, his supporters chanted "Take the Capitol", "Invade the Capitol", "Storm the Capitol" and "Fight for Trump" The documentary generally, was not misleading. The real scandal is that Trump wasn't tried and ended up back in power. I do think that we need to stop normalising Trump. He has a criminal history and is openly corrupt. He has shown himself to be a threat to democracy. The US right and their tech billionaire allies are having an malign impact on UK politics and culture, interfering both directly and indirectly, in ways that we should be doing more to challenge.
    • @beansprout I don't think Gails has closed, Do you mean Megans? I've never seen waiters at Gails. If you do mean Megans unfortunately I believe its just closed for refurbishment to be relaunched as some similarly awful 'concept'
    • Staff have changed and owner now taking a more active role….she is such a nice+lady so I encourage you to try again . I am all for supporting local business and personally very glad after appalling service earlier this year Gail’s has closed.. Change of staff and chefs were unreal.. In one month alone must have had at least 4 new chefs plus god knows how many waiters/ waitresses.. when Ai saw that happening, new it was gonna be down hill all the way.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...