Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cheers Quids - I hope not to get EDF withdrawal

> symptons whilst away. If I can find a way to post

> I will, as soon as my wife goes to bed as she is

> not so keen on me posting in "family" time. :(


Mick, just tell her you've got a headache...

You are dead right Mick - life is too short to take seriously - thats why i love a bet:))

Backed westwood at 28's in the open - 7's for the place paid for my weekend.

I have backed Tartan Bearer for the King George but keep an eye on who Ryan Moore opts to ride - he has not yet committed.

No - leave Saturday - currently preparing myself for 2 weeks with the kids. The second week is camping, so def no internet access that week.


Might bet on Tartan Bearer before I go though, King George is one of my fav races. Was there a few years ago when Gallileo and Mick Kinane beat Fantastic Light and Frankie Detorri in a great race. Got a print of it for my 40th birthday. Also had a decent win on Swain many moons ago, which was when I had very little money so its been a good race for me.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ...tend to wait until all the big transfers are

> completed, but just thinking about Citeh and their

> current spending spree, odds must be getting

> shorter by the week so they sound perfect for your

> laying system,


Yes I tend to agree. Although Betfair 15.5 suggests some future signings are already built in you have to say that until they are shorter than Arsenal (10.0) an opportunity for Laying it off with profit will surely exist.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The driver was male he was on a mobile No one was hurt l. Complete dick
    • Surely the question is whether James Mcash is effective in his various roles? I've seen nothing to suggest otherwise as a GG councillor or cabinet member. No idea about the teaching but he's made a career of it, so one would think he's perfectly fine on that front too. What I do object to is him being elected under one banner and hopping under another one, I suspect out of naked self interest. His headline rationale for the move is scarcely credible. He claims "the council was “planning for funding gaps larger than those faced in almost every year of Conservative and Liberal Democrat austerity, this time imposed by a Labour government...Unless something changes, Labour cuts will devastate the local services that as residents of this fantastic borough, we all rely on.” But what he's actually talking about here is the new Fair Funding Review, undertaken by notorious Tories Angela Rayner and Jim McMahon.   https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/the-fair-funding-review-20/the-fair-funding-review-20 The Fair Funding Review is explicitly about the redistribution of resources based on updated needs assessment, which, last time I looked was a key tenet of the left (including the Greens). Mcash also claims Southwark "cannot and does not stand up the the government" but that simply isn't the case as Southwark, Lambeth and London Councils have objected to the FFR because it fails to take into account Londoners' high housing costs. https://www.southwark.gov.uk/news/2025/southwark-and-lambeth-leaders-call-fair-funding  He seems high on bluster and low on actual detail. And the great problem Greens have to overcome, like everyone else, is that the country has no money.       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...