Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cheers Quids - I hope not to get EDF withdrawal

> symptons whilst away. If I can find a way to post

> I will, as soon as my wife goes to bed as she is

> not so keen on me posting in "family" time. :(


Mick, just tell her you've got a headache...

You are dead right Mick - life is too short to take seriously - thats why i love a bet:))

Backed westwood at 28's in the open - 7's for the place paid for my weekend.

I have backed Tartan Bearer for the King George but keep an eye on who Ryan Moore opts to ride - he has not yet committed.

No - leave Saturday - currently preparing myself for 2 weeks with the kids. The second week is camping, so def no internet access that week.


Might bet on Tartan Bearer before I go though, King George is one of my fav races. Was there a few years ago when Gallileo and Mick Kinane beat Fantastic Light and Frankie Detorri in a great race. Got a print of it for my 40th birthday. Also had a decent win on Swain many moons ago, which was when I had very little money so its been a good race for me.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ...tend to wait until all the big transfers are

> completed, but just thinking about Citeh and their

> current spending spree, odds must be getting

> shorter by the week so they sound perfect for your

> laying system,


Yes I tend to agree. Although Betfair 15.5 suggests some future signings are already built in you have to say that until they are shorter than Arsenal (10.0) an opportunity for Laying it off with profit will surely exist.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
    • Saying one thing so everyone can understand, and something different that only select people can understand is not inclusive, it’s dangerous.  
    • I'm not deliberately swerving anything. What exactly have they said in their communications in languages other than English that you object to? Why would they put those communications in other languages when the whole point was to connect with a specific group of people? Apologies if I've missed your point.
    • The point (which you're swerving) is not that the Greens spread their message in a language other than English - it's what they have said, and why they're shy about saying the same thing in other languages, including English. If a party in Northern Ireland circulates leaflets in Ulster Scots only that tells voters to elect them so they can be a strong Protestant voice, and has videos in Ulster Scots only that seek to discredit the First Minister by showing (a propos of nothing) images of them meeting the Pope - is that inclusivity or sectarianism?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...