Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Maurice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Walworth?! Now I know you are winding one up. As

> South London goes, and we're talking urban (as

> opposed to our suburban enclaves), The Prince of

> Wales in Cleaver Square is good for a drink and

> boules, if desired. Otherwise, travel north or

> out to suburbia (Lordship Lane springs to mind).



Oh Maurice , gone all la de da now, what with bistro's & "boules" & they call it "petanque" on here , also they get upset if you call them tossers, which of course they are.


Back to the real world, what's wrong with Walworth "The Bell" is lovely, I know that geezer got shot in the head in there but he was an IRA informant. I mean it's not exactly Dorset but......Please don't mention the Fox or somewhere like that or it will be one short "mornington cresent " stop before someone pipes up with "Oh early bird at the Harvester is good ?2.99 for ...." sh1t like that and the whole thread goes down.



Next....& Hurry please.



W**F

I'm afraid pubs are not my cup of tea, so to speak. It is difficult for me to get out at all and when I do, it is not to pubs. I can offer you an afternoon drink in the front drawing room or, given our lovely weather, the garden. It is much quieter and better quality than anything local.


There is the Doves, which I've never visited but seems to get a lot of positive press. The young man behind it is constantly raising his and his pub's profile. T

Alan Dale Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You seem a bit jealous *Bob*.



I agree it's a lovely house.


It must get annoying fishing beer cans and condoms out of your front garden most mornings though.


Not to mention stepping in vom when you open the door for Ocado.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Be careful, Woof.

>

> Many go in. None come out.

-------------------------------------------------------



Yes, caution is "key". I hear his patio is up to the basement window sill height this year.


In & out....relentlessly....that's what worries me......

Maurice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan I do worry about you dear boy.


> Have you suffered a job loss? Is all okay over on

> the estate?


Yes, I'm afraid Alan lost the paper round.


But he's managed to find seasonal work in 'Rimworld', so it's not all bad news.

Bob I fear you are right. And the boom boom cars to boot.


My summer garden parties were once the talk of the Society calendar. The Camberwell Society that is. I cannot recall anyone not leaving, but my mind isn't what it once was, so you could be right. I just thought most of us were now house bound or dead.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maurice Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Alan I do worry about you dear boy.

>

> > Have you suffered a job loss? Is all okay over

> on

> > the estate?

>

> Yes, I'm afraid Alan lost the paper round.

>

> But he's managed to find seasonal work in

> 'Rimworld', so it's not all bad news.


------------------------------------------------


And the hourly rates are good!

United in poor taste then - good stuff.


Rest assured, if there had been a more entertainingly-named shop in Camberwell selling sporting and fashion goods (say, "Fellatio World", or perhaps "Beanflicker City" etc) then I would have gone for that.


Alas, Rimworld is the best there is - by a country mile.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...