Jump to content

silver buckle appears to be shut


summerjt

Recommended Posts

Hey Georgia - if you were being serious and were actually thinking of taking the EDF drinks to Camberwell, you could try the Hermits Cave, which is a much, much better pub than the Buckle (although it is a little small).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I suppose if FHT is on the EDF radar then surely

> Hermit's Cave also qualifies.. as yes Jeremy very

> good venue which I think would go down very

> favourably.



As would The Bear. My personal favourite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't post-punk just a bad joke from the early eighties?


I've no idea. I just chucked it in 'cos I thought it sounded good. Muley might have the correct genre to hand.


Anyway, the Silver Buckle shut - where is Maurice going to go for his lunchtime hauf-n-hauf now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh that ghastly dive is a major reason we continue to petition for an independent Camberwell Grove. Local politicians are using police to crack down on our protests but my fellow silver foxes are warming to twitter as a way to let the world know of our plight. Surely news of our struggle beats the usual 'I'm on the train', 'I'm having a pint' drivel tweeted from some of the most ordinary of people.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh Bob it is true isn't it? My own postcode? How delightful. What should one choose? I recall when postcodes were much shorter. Was it the 60's when we added the second lot?


One does need some help I'm afraid. What should my personal postcode be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The most recent one did, despite the council making it very difficult for anyone to object (which interestingly they were forced to change for the CPZ consultation and look how that went for them). I will dig out the responses for you when I have more time so you can enlighten yourself.   Ha ha...the language used by councils when they see the results of a consultation and need an out to ignore the views of locals...;-) Did you not notice how this only became a thing once the consultation had been run....one wonders why!? Earl you can bluster all you like but you cannot ignore the fact the council closed the junction to emergency services and put lives at risk and resisted all calls (from the emergency services) to open it for them. Surely you can't defend that  or are you willingly turning a blind eye to that too? Ha ha, which kind of begs the question then why so many of you get so vexed by One Dulwich? Surely you could compartmentalise their work if the above was true? I suspect it has a lot to do with the accountability that they are forcing and the fact some don't like it.
    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...