Jump to content

Recommended Posts

daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> please elaborate Brendan.. ?



Loose Women = middle aged women watching middle aged women doing what they think middle aged women should be doing, i.e. sitting around talking about stuff, being slightly risqu?, and awfully funny sometimes, having opinions and every now and then letting their deep seated prejudices break to the surface.


Top Gear = middle aged men watching middle aged men doing what they think middle aged men should be doing, i.e. crashing cars talking about stuff, being slightly risqu?, and awfully funny sometimes, having opinions and every now and then letting their deep seated prejudices break to the surface.

daizie that it a sexist ageist comment you made earlier about them being past it.

Men that age are more respected in society, whilst women are being more and more marginalised past the age of 45.


A few of them are indeed 'only' in their thirties, but it's the range of subject matters that really irritates me, and makes me realise I am a snob.


Wasn't Carol married to Chris Evans? I seem to remember in the good ol' days of BBC London when it was a rock station she and he had a radio show on it together and they were brilliant.

Actually I don't mind Loose Women. It's better than Bargain Hunt.


It's akin to going down the pub with my girlfriend's aunties and a bag of amusing cock-shaped vegetables for entertainment - but then I guess that's the point.


It's complete drivel, naturally, but it's on at 12.30pm.. what do you expect? A Bafta-winning documentary premiere?

I kind of look forward to it, when I'm ill/ hungover and off work.


I can happily spend a day watching The Wright Stuff/ This Morning/ Loose Women/ Cash in the Attic and any of the programme featuring Kristian Digby.


I confess I've stayed up to watch the repeat at about 2am.


Sad really.

I too resent the 'past it' comment - I'm nearing 40 and don't feel (or indeed look so am often told) much different to late twenties, early thirties. I've got a big group of girlfriends and we discuss Loose Women type stuff but loads of other stuff too - politics, world events, whatever, along with the usual loose women stuff - kids, sex, how crap men can be, make-up, losing weight, counsel on each other's personal traumas (if needs be!) etc, etc.


That's why I like the show, it makes me feel warm and fuzzy and makes me laugh out loud....I work a few floors down from the show at ITV and if there was a job going on it I'd be there like a shot!


If you don't like it, bloomin' well turn over or turn off.


And yes Carol was married to Chris Evans, but now engaged to toy boy researcher she met on the show - good on her!

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Actually I don't mind Loose Women. It's better

> than Bargain Hunt.


Time to come in out of the sun *Bob*, there's no comparison, the rakish weskit and bow tie combo of the Wonnacot, the strategy by certain players to buy low and risking being chided by Tim. The utter old tat that people buy in the hope of making a profit, Tim's little lecture at the halfway point, especially when it's a valuable piece and he has to don his white gloves. The gap in his teeth, the flirting with the female contestants, he's channeling Terri-Thomas so he is.

And it's nice and quiet, by comparison Loose Women is a terrible noisy farrago with rotten dress sense.

Well if you are at home with children (I work part time) and you've had a busy morning and you come back for lunch it's nice to have a bit of light relief while you are tidying, getting kids lunch, etc, etc.


And no I don't sit on my arse watching TV all day but in the middle of my often manic day it's a bit of fun in the background. Pls don't do the 'watching TV in the day' snob thing....I catch it for a half and hour maybe before afternoon activities commence. That's all it is.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> A repeat of Quincy? A repeat of Columbo? A repeat

> of Kojak? Anything else really would be better.


Don't mess with me on this one, 'Looch.. when it comes to the daytime TV schedules, you'd have to get up early in the day to get one over on me (well, you'd have to get up before 9 for sure).


Columbo is usually around a 3pm kick-off, and ITV4's nostalgiaZone is patchy (Randall and Hopkirk?.. piss off!)


Of course being blessed with Freeview, a hard drive recorder and a stack of DVDs, there's no reason to watch anything as dire as 'Loose Women' at all. However, this breaks the golden rule of watching daytime telly: it has to be vacuous enough so that you can pretend you've just got it on in the background whilst you get on with your important daily tasks (ie nail clipping, yakking on phone, moving vases around pointlessly etc)

Surely Wimbledon is the ne plus ultra of day time telly? A state of semi-suspended sloth can be maintained for hours listening to the whap and flap of the ball on string, watching the white shapes float left and right, right and left. Occasionally something will stir as a tanned, slab-legged Serbian chases down a dying drop shot. But not enough to sustain any real interest.


Dead-rubber cricket Tests heading to pre-determined draws are also up there, albeit without the added Serbian titillation.

emc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I too resent the 'past it' comment - I'm nearing

> 40 and don't feel (or indeed look so am often

> told) much different to late twenties, early

> thirties. I've got a big group of girlfriends and

> we discuss Loose Women type stuff but loads of

> other stuff too - politics, world events,

> whatever, along with the usual loose women stuff

> - kids, sex, how crap men can be, make-up, losing

> weight, counsel on each other's personal traumas

> (if needs be!) etc, etc.

>

> That's why I like the show, it makes me feel warm

> and fuzzy and makes me laugh out loud....I work a

> few floors down from the show at ITV and if there

> was a job going on it I'd be there like a shot!

>

> If you don't like it, bloomin' well turn over or

> turn off.

>

> And yes Carol was married to Chris Evans, but now

> engaged to toy boy researcher she met on the show

> - good on her!


--------------------------------------------------


That's us told then !



W**F

I have self-analysed why I should not like this programme and I've come to the conclusion that there's nothing wrong in eaves-dropping on women having a good old natter. Besides, it may help me to unravel the mysteries of the female mind - though on reflection this may be too optimistic. It may raise more questions than answers....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...