Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Pro Southwark said:

The website is not mine. I merely champion its cause. It has full support from the SE5 Forum and the Camberwell Blog often highlights the cause. Perhaps they are more serious minded people.



Oh dear. One owes the whole of East Dulwich an apology. It seems there is a connection with my corner of hell to this group. Mr/Ms Pro, I would not wear endorsement by such websites as a badge of honour.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I kind of think that people who use threats or

> acts of violence to achieve their goals are

> terrorists.

>

> The violent destruction of property, or

> barricading of roads or runways falls into this

> category.


How does that sit with Britian's military strongarming across the globe?

'Zackly where you'd expect it to sit Brendan.


From a defence perspective military activity is fully justified, in an invasive capacity rarely so.


The challenge lies in 'pre-emptive' defence as attack (Iraq), or in defence of British interests through American-stylee police action (Afghanistan).


Then again, I think that mine is a view that a lot of people share, which is why HMG go to such lengths with dodgy dossiers to 'prove' the requirement for defence.


My view is that the global instability which creates the need for military intervention should be addressed at source by restricting consumption of critical resources and with proactive non-military solutions to growing pressures on agriculture and mass migration.


It annoys me that those that won't do the latter, then complain about having the wool pulled over their eyes on military activity.

It is a well documented fact that the government played a role in 7/7 in order to fuel the flames of hatred toward so-called ?terrorists?. And to those who ?serve? or have relatives who ?served? I understand your shame demonstrated by outrage toward me. I don?t live in Camberwell but people there still fly the red flag proudly for the repressed class and you all should face up to your hatred of the poor and unrepresented who struggle to eat while you argue over the quality at the giant supermarkets owned by the rich few to exploit the majority. It is no laughing matter.
When i see the phrase "Well documented fact", I always suspect someone's talking horsehit delusional or otherwise. No point in arguing with you as you don't get debate you just get a rant and o'level sociology marxism. Seriously, if you can show me some of these documents that undoubtly prove the states involvement in 7/7 I'll join you......
7/7 Ripple Effect. Was given the biggest shoeing ever seen on Beeb's Conspiracy Files last night. Down to one of the arch conspiracy theorists being shown the evidence that disproves his own rantings - and agreeing he had been proved completely wrong. And finding and filming (leading to the subsequent arrest of) the idiot who made the principal conspiracy film out there. (PS As well as making up loads of other stuff, he also thinks he's Jesus)

"well documented fact" = load of old claptrap from deranged conspiracy theorist


I suggest you keep yourself to Camberwell, where the people are more serious-minded. In ED we're far to busy worshipping wealth (and on Saturdays, we worship Satan! Or you can pop into Green & Blue if you prefer).

Consider the Communities Sustainability Act fiasco. This was supposed to be about PEOPLE choosing development projects and guidelines locally. And now Southwark is packing it with COUNCILLORS and ignoring what PEOPLE are suggesting. Can?t you see how the will of the PEOPLE is being ignored.


Another step downward.

Seriously my sister-in-law's best friend was killed that day. She and her family didn't g&t confirmation for over a week there was so little left to find.


I kindly suggest you take your delusional nonsense and fuck off frankly. Tit!!


Only Iiiiii have the truth, you are all bliiiiiind. Ha ha, wanker!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just shows, to me, once proud to be a citizen of UK.. now.. well if we pay/contribute to services - nhs, police, fire etc and folk who have made this there home - no matter what creed or culture.. for the love c of God, can someone  please explain to me.. how we have working royals who like them or not, have tried and continue to actually support and make a change and then we have Andrew.. who just destroys everything.. not just him, or royalty but his own children..  I had great admiration for The Queen - and respect.. as have a huge number of people.. but.. these old traditions where gosh.. live rent free and can’t get chucked out until I believe 2070? From what I scanned..well he has and continues to have it all.. has to go thru what old rules? Etc.  doubt very much he has even kept the upkeep maintenance up on his abode.. and do the shite keeps on pulling up.. What has Andrew done for UK or for that matter since he was 20?? Do please tell me      
    • Have applied the green roof at a number of properties and no issues you are concerned about detected. Have issues with cats defecating in the vicinity, however, they are not selecting the green roof specifically. Use decent compost, slow release fertiliser specific for green roofs, and lay it methodically not leaving blank patches. It looks amazing when cared for and adds value.  
    • Some suggestions for mandatory action might include:- 1. Permit retailers to display facial images on the premises  of previous offenders at their local store. 2. Sound an alert and display images on screens inside the store when the FR flags up a person entering who is on the national database of shoplifters. 3. Physically bar recognised shoplifters from the premises. Should they attempt to force entry then charges should be pressed under aggravated trespass, which  a criminal offence under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. 4. Change the law to allow retailers to have enhanced powers of citizens arrest. What would you suggest? The UK seems to have the most lenient policy towards shoplifting , probably because of other demands on the police force. On the plus side, they may have more time for it now that non-crime hate incidents will no longer be investigated. Other countries, such as the USA have much more sever punishment as does Singapore where repeat offenders or aggravated cases can be sentenced to up to 3 years in prison, a fine, or both.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...