Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Pro Southwark said:

The website is not mine. I merely champion its cause. It has full support from the SE5 Forum and the Camberwell Blog often highlights the cause. Perhaps they are more serious minded people.



Oh dear. One owes the whole of East Dulwich an apology. It seems there is a connection with my corner of hell to this group. Mr/Ms Pro, I would not wear endorsement by such websites as a badge of honour.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I kind of think that people who use threats or

> acts of violence to achieve their goals are

> terrorists.

>

> The violent destruction of property, or

> barricading of roads or runways falls into this

> category.


How does that sit with Britian's military strongarming across the globe?

'Zackly where you'd expect it to sit Brendan.


From a defence perspective military activity is fully justified, in an invasive capacity rarely so.


The challenge lies in 'pre-emptive' defence as attack (Iraq), or in defence of British interests through American-stylee police action (Afghanistan).


Then again, I think that mine is a view that a lot of people share, which is why HMG go to such lengths with dodgy dossiers to 'prove' the requirement for defence.


My view is that the global instability which creates the need for military intervention should be addressed at source by restricting consumption of critical resources and with proactive non-military solutions to growing pressures on agriculture and mass migration.


It annoys me that those that won't do the latter, then complain about having the wool pulled over their eyes on military activity.

It is a well documented fact that the government played a role in 7/7 in order to fuel the flames of hatred toward so-called ?terrorists?. And to those who ?serve? or have relatives who ?served? I understand your shame demonstrated by outrage toward me. I don?t live in Camberwell but people there still fly the red flag proudly for the repressed class and you all should face up to your hatred of the poor and unrepresented who struggle to eat while you argue over the quality at the giant supermarkets owned by the rich few to exploit the majority. It is no laughing matter.
When i see the phrase "Well documented fact", I always suspect someone's talking horsehit delusional or otherwise. No point in arguing with you as you don't get debate you just get a rant and o'level sociology marxism. Seriously, if you can show me some of these documents that undoubtly prove the states involvement in 7/7 I'll join you......
7/7 Ripple Effect. Was given the biggest shoeing ever seen on Beeb's Conspiracy Files last night. Down to one of the arch conspiracy theorists being shown the evidence that disproves his own rantings - and agreeing he had been proved completely wrong. And finding and filming (leading to the subsequent arrest of) the idiot who made the principal conspiracy film out there. (PS As well as making up loads of other stuff, he also thinks he's Jesus)

"well documented fact" = load of old claptrap from deranged conspiracy theorist


I suggest you keep yourself to Camberwell, where the people are more serious-minded. In ED we're far to busy worshipping wealth (and on Saturdays, we worship Satan! Or you can pop into Green & Blue if you prefer).

Consider the Communities Sustainability Act fiasco. This was supposed to be about PEOPLE choosing development projects and guidelines locally. And now Southwark is packing it with COUNCILLORS and ignoring what PEOPLE are suggesting. Can?t you see how the will of the PEOPLE is being ignored.


Another step downward.

Seriously my sister-in-law's best friend was killed that day. She and her family didn't g&t confirmation for over a week there was so little left to find.


I kindly suggest you take your delusional nonsense and fuck off frankly. Tit!!


Only Iiiiii have the truth, you are all bliiiiiind. Ha ha, wanker!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The problem is not generally with the stores or drivers - who generally are doing the best they can and receive peanuts for each package. (Rumored that Evri will pay only 20-30p to a shop that receives/sends a parcel). The problem is the business model of these courier companies that do not invest in infrastructure or depots, but just outsource everything and set "contractor" drivers impossible targets. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/dec/08/christmas-parcel-delivery-drivers-driven-to-the-edge
    • I don’t think that this is a Barry’s-specific issue in the area. I’m constantly having parcels refused for delivery at the InPost lockers outside the Family Store on Upland as well as at the Esso garage by the Rye
    • I was several miles away and I didn't miss it, as apparently didn't lots of others also several miles away. But as I and others reported although we guessed it was fireworks it sounded more like the WWI front line, albeit from a distance! 
    • Due to many people's packed social schedules at this time of year, we are giving the December Forum Drinks a miss and restarting at the EDT  in January (if they will have us! I think we have all been well behaved so far!) Wishing everybody  a very happy festive season xxx
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...