Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Pro Southwark said:

The website is not mine. I merely champion its cause. It has full support from the SE5 Forum and the Camberwell Blog often highlights the cause. Perhaps they are more serious minded people.



Oh dear. One owes the whole of East Dulwich an apology. It seems there is a connection with my corner of hell to this group. Mr/Ms Pro, I would not wear endorsement by such websites as a badge of honour.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I kind of think that people who use threats or

> acts of violence to achieve their goals are

> terrorists.

>

> The violent destruction of property, or

> barricading of roads or runways falls into this

> category.


How does that sit with Britian's military strongarming across the globe?

'Zackly where you'd expect it to sit Brendan.


From a defence perspective military activity is fully justified, in an invasive capacity rarely so.


The challenge lies in 'pre-emptive' defence as attack (Iraq), or in defence of British interests through American-stylee police action (Afghanistan).


Then again, I think that mine is a view that a lot of people share, which is why HMG go to such lengths with dodgy dossiers to 'prove' the requirement for defence.


My view is that the global instability which creates the need for military intervention should be addressed at source by restricting consumption of critical resources and with proactive non-military solutions to growing pressures on agriculture and mass migration.


It annoys me that those that won't do the latter, then complain about having the wool pulled over their eyes on military activity.

It is a well documented fact that the government played a role in 7/7 in order to fuel the flames of hatred toward so-called ?terrorists?. And to those who ?serve? or have relatives who ?served? I understand your shame demonstrated by outrage toward me. I don?t live in Camberwell but people there still fly the red flag proudly for the repressed class and you all should face up to your hatred of the poor and unrepresented who struggle to eat while you argue over the quality at the giant supermarkets owned by the rich few to exploit the majority. It is no laughing matter.
When i see the phrase "Well documented fact", I always suspect someone's talking horsehit delusional or otherwise. No point in arguing with you as you don't get debate you just get a rant and o'level sociology marxism. Seriously, if you can show me some of these documents that undoubtly prove the states involvement in 7/7 I'll join you......
7/7 Ripple Effect. Was given the biggest shoeing ever seen on Beeb's Conspiracy Files last night. Down to one of the arch conspiracy theorists being shown the evidence that disproves his own rantings - and agreeing he had been proved completely wrong. And finding and filming (leading to the subsequent arrest of) the idiot who made the principal conspiracy film out there. (PS As well as making up loads of other stuff, he also thinks he's Jesus)

"well documented fact" = load of old claptrap from deranged conspiracy theorist


I suggest you keep yourself to Camberwell, where the people are more serious-minded. In ED we're far to busy worshipping wealth (and on Saturdays, we worship Satan! Or you can pop into Green & Blue if you prefer).

Consider the Communities Sustainability Act fiasco. This was supposed to be about PEOPLE choosing development projects and guidelines locally. And now Southwark is packing it with COUNCILLORS and ignoring what PEOPLE are suggesting. Can?t you see how the will of the PEOPLE is being ignored.


Another step downward.

Seriously my sister-in-law's best friend was killed that day. She and her family didn't g&t confirmation for over a week there was so little left to find.


I kindly suggest you take your delusional nonsense and fuck off frankly. Tit!!


Only Iiiiii have the truth, you are all bliiiiiind. Ha ha, wanker!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Dawsons heights is not run by Southwark  Council- it comes under a management company,
    • I’m currently conducting exploratory research into menstrual health education in UK secondary schools and would really value the insight of PSHE leads, Heads of Year, or pastoral staff.    The research aims to understand:   How the menstrual cycle is currently taught within the RSHE framework Where schools feel confident — and where there may be gaps Whether students are taught and  asking questions around the full menstrual cycle, symptoms, wellbeing and conditions such as PMS/PMDD or endometriosis How schools support students in feeling empowered to understand their bodies and seek help appropriately Whether education around nutrition, lifestyle, and menstrual wellbeing is currently addressed   The long-term goal is to explore whether there is a need for additional, age-appropriate, medically informed support on the menstrual cycle.  I’m not selling a programme and there is no obligation beyond a 30 minute informal chat online (Unpaid). All conversations will be confidential and used only to inform the research. If you work in a UK secondary school and would be willing to share your perspective, I would be extremely grateful to hear from you. Please comment below or email me [email protected] Thank you for the vital work you do. Best wishes, Emma       
    • Nice topic and nice song!  1) Definitely top of Canonbie, looking North. 2) What used to be Francesca Cabrini school at the top of FHR. 3) Honor Oak playground, next to Camberwell New cemetery.
    • https://link.dice.fm/vAN1wkYO9Yb?sharer_id=5b9635360e0d4e77db542ea3
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...