Jump to content

Recommended Posts

to bring it back to the bbc, were they not the only people to point out to everyone that the weapons of mass destruction did not exist...poodle to the government no. the fall out may have cost dyke but it was the only media organisation of such international force to say anything.


yes, yes, we are fed lies, you just need to read any john le carre novel to realise that or watch spooks (oops sorry bbc...again) to see how we are manipulated everyday.


but the most frustrating point is how by shouting like this on forums you alienate people from thinking that they can change things from grass roots up. chose not to shop in certain places, it's more powerful than any conspiracy theory. little everyday leads to powerful change, yet by ranting and alienating people they feel powerless and then do not act, therefore adding to the problem rather than opening eyes.


ho hum...

Bob, lol, Aids from local council,


Sherwick Nothing wrong with wanting a waitrose, but I think free shopping covers a multitude of problems and I felt annoyed and compared one issue, without thinking of the choice we have about what shops open up.


Keef And where do the NHS get there money from, One example,my mums 87yr old friend who's son had been bathing her for 2years as she was unable to get in and out the bath after being told she was not entitled to equipment as she had her son there. He dutifully carried on and didnt mind but she was humiliated, it took a 7month fight to get her what she needed, I dont know you or your life but if you have lived without encountering the problems people face trying to get what they need then lets just say we've led extremely diffrent lives. I would probably "have a go at hard working nurses", you are probably refering to a thread I put up before, what you seem to be forgetting is I was sitting with a friend who is a nuse.

Honestly PROSouthwark, I can't work out if you're having a laugh or not. If you are, then fair play, it's a good character, and you got a few of us.


However, I suspect you're not, in whcih case, you're really quite annoying, as you seem to refuse to answer any questions, and just keep saying exactly the same thing over and over again, like a brainwashed zombie or something.


Frankly, you strike me as the sort of person who would join a religious cult, then join in with a mass suicide. That'd show 'em!

yes, but what i'm trying to say mr pro is that you are alienating a lot of people instead of attracting them. you also totally ignored my point about the bbc which was what i understood this thread to be about.


by all means if 'chose with your wallet' is a call to the revolution then so be it, i just think that 'revolution' (looking at british history) is not a very british thing. more like slow appropriation. don't forget we actually enjoying queuing where as our revolutionary neighbours in france abhor it ;)

The enlightened masses seem car more con erned with Britains got talent than grassroots revolution. And I don't think they're being kept down by the man, I just don't think it appeals. Fridge, big screen tv, a roof over their heads and decent employment law protecting us all from exploitaton.


Not such a bad old world compared to any time in the past ever. Plus revolutions have a habit of having pretty nasty consequences, not just from the slim elite tier that's removed but for everyone. Witness the various terrors in France through Russia to Iran and Cambodia. Not a great precedence.


Of course you're different and benign. Especially with the apparent omnipotent grasp of the truth you have; I'm almost looking forward to your enlightened and above all reasoned Nd reasonable leadership.


Roll on ?No Pasar?n!

Keef And where do the NHS get there money from,


Not the council. x amount of money is given to the primary health service, then that money is paid to the trust based on patient referrals (put very simply).


One example,my mums 87yr old friend who's son had been bathing her for 2years as she was unable to get in and out the bath after being told she was not entitled to equipment as she had her son there. He dutifully carried on and didnt mind but she was humiliated, it took a 7month fight to get her what she needed


The OT's will probably have taken the view that she could be strip washed, and so didn't require a very expensive bath lift or something like that. May sound unfair, especially if you're involved, but hard decisions have to be made because there is only a limited amount of money out there.


I dont know you or your life but if you have lived without encountering the problems people face trying to get what they need then lets just say we've led extremely diffrent lives. I would probably "have a go at hard working nurses", you are probably refering to a thread I put up before, what you seem to be forgetting is I was sitting with a friend who is a nuse.


No you don't know me. I work with blind people, and have worked within OT teams, so have a pretty good idea of people trying to get what they feel they need / deserve. A lot of the time I agreed with them, but what can you do, budgets are budgets, and we can only do what the criteria lets us, like it or not.


I wasn't referring to any other thread actually, my memory isn't that great right now, too many sleepless nights in the last 9 weeks.

PROSouthwark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes we are manipulated everyday and fed lies. You

> got it. And we must change it by revolution from

> the grassroots and mass distribution of wealth

> back to the PEOPLE not the ruling elite. Finally,

> the defenders and enlightened masses are stepping

> up here. Thank you.


Ha ha! Yeah far out maaaan!.


Either you're Rik from The Young Ones or a trustafarian slumming it. Which one is it?

antijen>

"Plimsoul,"bbc the only people in the media to point out there was no weapons of mass destruction", what does that say about the media when millions of people did not believe it."


2 things: back at you what does it say when millions chose to believe the government instead? does that mean that they are trust worthy?


secondly, it means my point, why bash the one institution that actually isn't owned by a proprietor? there is even (if we want to discuss conspiracies) the 'media conspiracy' against the bbc.


but put plainly i think mockney peers is right, it's not even a class thing it's human nature which tends to dictate 'i'm alright jack so i'm not doing s**t to change that.'

Isnt that a bit of a contradiction Plimsoul, in one line your saying "2 things: back at you what does it say when millions chose to believe the government instead? does that mean that they are trust worthy?" then "it's human nature which tends to dictate 'i'm alright jack so i'm not doing s**t to change that." so if thats your reckoning couldn't the people who didnt protest been thinking, well we're alright.

PROSouthwark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Consider the Communities Sustainability Act

> fiasco. This was supposed to be about PEOPLE

> choosing development projects and guidelines

> locally. And now Southwark is packing it with

> COUNCILLORS and ignoring what PEOPLE are

> suggesting. Can?t you see how the will of the

> PEOPLE is being ignored.



Oh dear. I can;t believe the rest of you are falling for this blatant performance-art style wind up!

antijen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keef you didnt say where the money comes from. It

> doesnt change the fact, someone has a zimmer who

> for whatever reason needed it, due to these people

> doing what they are doing, as amusing as that may

> seem to many posters.


Antijen - Your arguments would be far more persuasive if you would write in grammatical English - it is impossible to understand what you are attempting to say in the above paragraph. Even John Prescott could do better.

MM, antijen was referring to the people in Maurice's clip, who gave a nearly new walking frame to someone who apparently needed it. It does make sense it context, it's still not convincing to me though. I actually respect what whose people were trying to do, I just dear that in siding with PROsouthwark, antijen has gotten a bit carried away.

PROSouthwark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And Peckham of course. Eileen is fighting the

> good fight on Sustainable Communities and wholly

> endorses giving it over to the PEOPLE. Now who is

> laughing?


Me I live in Dorset!


As to 7/7, keep an eye out for the black helicopters!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That a shocking story.  Spurs?  You appear to be lost.  Haringey is very much the other side of the river.  
    • Every year they ask for more and every year it is an exhausting process pushing back on that for local residents and councillors. What annoys me is that at the post event consultation/ feedback this year, I specifically asked them if the rumours around applying for two weekends next year were true. They told me no. So that was a lie. Anyway, we go again. 
    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...