Jump to content

Recommended Posts

*Bob* wrote in the general section :


As reported by our very own Daizie, poster extraordinaire with a colourful history of fairytale postings for the purposes of trolling, not to mention a penchant for registering undering several different names in order to back-up her own tall tales.


Now Bob, I know we have had our disagreements in the past. But.. what sort of person do you think I am ? I would never worry decent, nice, people. Cross my heart hope to die .


You must have me down as a right nutter !


And I have never fairytale posted ANYTHING nor registered under several different names to back up tall tales . Felicity Normal if your reading ' TA VERY MUCH' .

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7043-dear-bob-re-yesterdays-incident/
Share on other sites

daizie, if the other thread is true then I'm really sorry that you had a bad experience and I hope you're ok.


But surely you can see that, even without the startling similarities between you and certain previous troublesome posters, your general attitude to the forum has always been one of contempt and negativity and so it's not wholely surprising that people are having their doubts about your sincerity now, is it?

HonaloochieB + Snorky = *bob*


I am genuinely unsure about dazie. She has digs at the forum, especially Sean, which are sometimes funny IMO, but sometimes a bit nasty. There are reasons to believe she has had other names, but I am not quite sure she is


Spangles30 / NatashaD / FelicityNormal, whom I am certain are the same person (well not certain, in that I have no proof, but the spidey sense always said so).


My first thought on reading dazie's thread about the flashing incident, was the same as *bob*'s, but then I reread it, and thought it did sound pretty genuine. Unlike Felicity's Lothario classic. I am therefore willing to give dazie benefit of the doubt. If, however, it is a "joke", then it's a weird one, and really not funny.

The Felicity and Poppy thing is quite funny, someone else getting the blame for the naughtiness. Reminds me a bit of when I got into a homophobic ex boyfriends on-line dating account, changing his status to bi-sexual. I had weeks of pleasure imagining him getting matches and emails from men. It's still making me laugh. You'd have had to know him to realise how funny it was. Serves him right for being so tight.

Daizie, as it happens I don't think you're NatashaD/spangles30 or poppylucky, and I'm not sure you're Felicity, although I think you probably are.


What I really don't understand, and this is a genuine question not a dig, is why you're always so negative and needlessly nasty and if you think so little of the forum and it's users, why you bother posting.

Annaj wrote:- What I really don't understand, and this is a genuine question not a dig, is why you're always so negative and needlessly nasty and if you think so little of the forum and it's users, why you bother posting.



Not quite accurate Anna, Daizie positively and robustly defended TonyLS. on the queue jumping thread.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It would be very difficult indeed to rip it off in passing. However I stand well  away from the edge of the pavement and keep an eye out. Many bus stops don't have indicators of bus times, including the one outside the Post Office, which I use a lot. If I'm going somewhere which is only served by one of the buses from that stop, I don't like not knowing whether I will have to wait two minutes or twenty minutes, and I often forget to look before I leave the house. What more do you think could be done? Hordes of police at every minute of the day standing at every possible place in Inner London where somebody may get their phone out? Obviously I'm joking, but I don't think there's any indication that the police don't take these crimes seriously. There's been a noticeably increased police presence around ED lately, and there are various police/community initiatives where you can make your voice heard if you have concerns and  sensible ideas to contribute. It's very easy to complain without knowing all the background and the full facts. If memory serves, and I'm sure someone will correct me if it doesn't, a previous Tory administration drastically reduced police numbers in London. Therefore it's even more important for the police to assess priorities when deciding where to concentrate their limited resources. I imagine that  things like phone thefts and shoplifting come rather further down the list of priorities than things like stabbings and sexual assaults.
    • Either the car was on blues or it wasn't, maybe OP can clarify? But I still don't get why it would be a good thing that the cyclist escaped from two police vans - they would have either arrested or protected him, depending on the scenario. 
    • That seems the more likely scenario, doesn't it? I suspect unwarranted assumptions have been made. What is the evidence that the car was a police car? What is the evidence that two police vans arrived later "to help give chase"? To "help"? If the car was not a police car, other interpretations of the situation are possible, as said above. It could be that the cyclist had done nothing wrong and was trying to get away from the pursuing car for completely other reasons. Who knows? It's very easy to jump to conclusions without knowing all the facts. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...