Jump to content

save the children charity shop

aerie

By aerie
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

aerie

aerie

Posted
Posted

what has happened here? this used to be sparkling clean and aesthetically pleasing with good stock albeit tres expensive but we shopped there for that reason, ie unique clothes and accessories. this week there were 3 tiny plastic ducks for a childs bath for ?1 each! on the shelf and tatty shoes and gritty dirty shelves. The quality and aesthetics have plummeted. Its all very well having high end designer clothes and shoes donated but frankly if they are over 7 years old then perhaps they should be on a vintage rail and not presented as current. And whyare there low end garments more expensive than sold in the original low end store. There are other charity shops in which to source low end clothes but not what we expect from MLAGS

stores.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/70549-save-the-children-charity-shop/
Share on other sites
VixSta

VixSta

Posted
Posted

I saw a pair of Jimmy Choos in there the other week!


I've donated to Save the Children recently, I donated items from the 'more expensive' end of my wardrobe, e.g. stuff from Coast and very nice dresses from Warehouse. Appreciate both these shops are high street and not designer, I still felt the quality of the items was more suitable for Save the Children than the other charity shops we have. I always enjoy a browse and am often surprised at some of the stuff people are prepared to donate when they could get a decent amount of money themselves on eBay.

Angharad_L

Angharad_L

Posted
Posted

I found children's clothes in there from a multipack being sold as single items for a higher price than the original shop.


One example was baby grows from Sainsburys which were selling for ?2 each when they are ?6 for five as a multipack.


Agree it's great to donate to charity but don't agree it should be more expensive than buying items from the original seller, whether they are new or secondhand. Feels dishonest to me?


And I found secondhand muslins in a bundle which were dirty... :(


Angharad

EDmummy

EDmummy

Posted
Posted
I've donated some higher end items that I could well have made money from on eBay (Nicole Farhi, Toast, Cos) but decided I'd rather make a contribution to this worthwhile charity. I recently got an email to say that so far my items have raised over ?150. That's much more than I would have donated directly. I don't have money to burn and could have put that sum to good use had I got that from eBay sales but I think Save the Children will put it to much better use.
Sue

Sue

Posted
Posted

Lynne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They were asking ?290 for a "vintage" mirror that

> was obviously new, which is probably against

> various trading laws.. ?290 would have been very

> expensive even if t was old. Still, if someone was

> daft enough to part with their money......



I guess that is what they are banking on.


I've only been in there once. Saw their prices and came straight out again :(

EDmummy

EDmummy

Posted
Posted

Not unreasonable when running a multi-billion ? organisation that reaches many millions of children worldwide. Pay peanuts you get monkeys.


HerneHill81 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well, they need the money. Their Chief Executive's

> salary is over ?130,000 per annum. Give

> generously, folks!

slh2009

slh2009

Posted
Posted

I agree....my friend holds a senior position at Save and she's the hardest working person I know, often in the office til midnight working on deadlines, at weekends too, and altho on a decent salary it doesn't compare to people I have worked with in the city who do much less.....





Not unreasonable when running a multi-billion ? organisation that reaches many millions of children worldwide. Pay peanuts you get monkeys.


HerneHill81 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well, they need the money. Their Chief Executive's

> salary is over ?130,000 per annum. Give

> generously, folks!




Not unreasonable when running a multi-billion ? organisation that reaches many millions of children worldwide. Pay peanuts you get monkeys.


HerneHill81 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well, they need the money. Their Chief Executive's

> salary is over ?130,000 per annum. Give

> generously, folks!

ruffers

ruffers

Posted
Posted

I guess charity shops are driven by what people donate, and there was a piece in The Guardian today mentioning this which may be relevant -


"The rise of discounters such as Aldi, Lidl and Primark has played a role in both factors. Not only have they increased competition for charity shops, but the growing popularity of cut-price clothing means the quality of the garments in people?s wardrobes is not what it was. So, when a household clears out its wardrobes, unwanted clothing is more likely to go in the bin than be taken to the charity shop. Oxfam said that donations fell by 2% last year."


Full article here - http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/aug/14/oxfam-tough-test-new-era-lidl-aldi-primark

jo1973

jo1973

Posted
Posted

Hi everyone,


As a volunteer of the shop mentioned here, I would like to take this opportunity to apologise if any of you are unhappy with your experience of Living & Giving. It is a really wonderful shop to work for and we all work very hard to provide quality products at great prices for our very valued customers.


We strive to only sell items that fit within the MLAG ethos, but as I'm sure you will all understand, sometimes differences of opinion on price, label and quality can sometimes (and hopefully, rarely!) occur, especially when we are introducing new volunteers into the team. Great care is taken with training to make sure this is only transitory. We are EXTREMELY picky about what goes onto the shop floor, from the huge number of donations we have each week. Anything not suitable for MLAG goes straight to a Save The Children shop, so we are really taking care to make the shop look as amazing as possible. It would be very hard for us to have a dedicated area to vintage as the shop is small and we only actually receive truly vintage clothes sporadically.


Any damaged, dirty or wrongfully priced items are swiftly dealt with and we are always happy to discuss any items you are not happy with. We're a very friendly bunch of people, so please don't be afraid to point things out to us! I personally was told about the mirror and we have rectified the error, so apologies to all who were upset by this.


We also now have a fantastic NEW manager (after a long search) that is now making sure MLAG is a wonderful place for you all to donate and shop on Lordship Lane....I hope you will all continue to support the work we try and do to raise as much money as possible for the charity.


Anyone is welcome to volunteer (only the managerial position is salaried) and you only need to give 4 hours of your time per week. Please feel free to pop by and pick up a form to join us and see for yourselves the work we do.

  • 2 weeks later...
SoozieW

SoozieW

Posted
Posted

Lynne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They were asking ?290 for a "vintage" mirror that

> was obviously new, which is probably against

> various trading laws.. ?290 would have been very

> expensive even if t was old. Still, if someone was

> daft enough to part with their money......



Is there supposed to be a decimal pint in there? If not they are having a laugh. I don't expect to find things that expensive in a charityshop.

  • 3 weeks later...
giggirl

giggirl

Posted
Posted

Jacqui5254 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I imagine it is a reflection of the donations

> received.

>

> How many people actually have donated 'high end

> designer clothes and shoes' since the shop opened?


Me, I donate to Save the Children and my wardrobe is pretty high-end. I think they were most likely my Choos that someone spotted. Ebay isn't for everyone; I don't like ebay and I don't use it. I'd much rather have a charity make money than a big corporate take a large cut of the profits. If I'm donating something that I paid ???? for then I want the charity to make as much money as possible.

siousxiesue

siousxiesue

Posted
Posted

SoozieW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lynne Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > They were asking ?290 for a "vintage" mirror

> that

> > was obviously new, which is probably against

> > various trading laws.. ?290 would have been

> very

> > expensive even if t was old. Still, if someone

> was

> > daft enough to part with their money......

>

>

> Is there supposed to be a decimal pint in there?

> If not they are having a laugh. I don't expect to

> find things that expensive in a charityshop.


Good point Soozie but as a volunteer in a charity shop not a million miles away, I have to say we receive the most eclectic mix of donations it's possible to have-some items are personally pointed out by the donor as being worth a fair amount and we have to respect that and get as good a price as we can. For example-jewellery, new with tags designer items or fantastic pieces of furniture. It's a fine balance between honouring the donor, maximising money for our charity and keeping customer's happy so they'll come back!

Jacqui5254

Jacqui5254

Posted
Posted

This might be a good opportunity to remind us all to donate some of our unwanted [and decent!] things.


Or donate as an option to helping with the refugee crisis.



http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/about-us/emergencies/child-refugee-crisis-appeal?utm_campaign=refugee&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=refugeecrisisappealppc&sissr=1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      DD, "Rejoice rejoice. It's a pity he and his fellow clowns were completely annihilated at the ballot box. I mean they were doing so well after all 🙃🙃" At least the economy and unemployment weren't in the mess they are now. What is it, give the public sector a whopping pay increase with no strings attached, double the black hole and then blame it on the last Govt. Give me strength. Rachel from accounts shouldn't be anywhere near the economy. The final straw was increasing employer NI contributions and look how that's worked out. Month on month both inflation and unemployment have risen. Won't be long before inflation and u/e are exceeding 5%, but guess what, They'll blame Sunak and go.  Lets have a snap election right NOW, then see how poorly Starmer, Reeves and Rainer do. They're already plotting to get rid of Starmer, and if you think its bad now, you ain't seen nothing yet. Oh and did I mention Starmer wanting to stop Freedom of Speech............................................Normal people can see right through what him and co are doing, great at spending other peoples money, him and co don't have = bankruptcy. We'll just repeat the economic collapse that happened in Greece and wasn't it in Italy as well?
    • Pugwash
      Seeking an English Lit A Level tutor to focus on Othello

      By Pugwash · Posted

      One of the best of Shakespeare 's plays.  I did Othello for A level. Also seen a number of stage and film versions. Is there any specific aspects of the play that is difficult for your daughter to understand?  
    • malumbu
      Cllr Williams to stand down

      By malumbu · Posted

      @Sue think this is your quote.  It wasn't binary, good Vs bad, and Corbyn had a lot of popular support, as evidenced by the previous election. He had aot of good policies, some picked up by others since. He was defeated by a mixture of a right wing press,good targeting the Johnson 'Get Brexit Done" and for some that Johnson was a funny loveable rogue/fool/liar/philander/opportunist.  I wouldn't see choosing the perceived least worst candidate out of the two major parties as being "good sense'.  We imagine that Corbyn would have been terrible, but we don't know.  He would have taken a stronger line against Israel in Gaza, not sucked up to Trump nut on Russia?  Would the UK be better for that?
    • Pugwash
      Looking to buy or adopt a dog

      By Pugwash · Posted

      We have had 4 greyhounds - the last one, a bitch, was not speyed so we  had to pay for that at our local vet.  Only one dog was nervous around children and only one was cat friendly.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...