Jump to content

Recommended Posts

IMPORTANT- to everyone using facebook. Please pass this around to all your friends. Facebook has allowed a third party advertiser to use your posted pictures without your permission. To prevent this click on settings, beside the logout button. Select PRIVACY SETTINGS. Select NEWS FEEDS & WALL. Select the tag that reads FACEBOOK ADS. Theres a drop down box, select NO ONE, save changes, and your done. :-)
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7196-important-all-facebookers/
Share on other sites

We discussed this on another thread. It's in the terms of service you agree to whe you create an account. If like me you think it's a poor show then just don't upload any photos, I certainly don't.


But no point getting uppity about it if you put the little tick in the 'i agree' box ;)

I got into Facebook last year and in all honesty I really enjoyed it for about 6 months but then I realised I'd flogged a dead horse long enough and got bloody sick of it. I've only got one picture on my page and they're welcome to it.


Facebook also serves as a good reminder of how annoying girls can be sometimes.

Kells Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why's that, BBW?!



O.K, perhaps I jumped in head first on this one.


I know I don't have to read them but on my facebook girls my age (25) or there abouts are constantly updating their status and harp on about what they're doing i.e Emma is eating, Ayshe is picking her nose. This happens every 5 minutes to half an hour.


Pointless bordering on compulsive.


Fella's tend not to do this unless they're batting for the other team.



but why? it's meaningless. The number of people posting this "advice" on facebook is like a plague


it's not true

nothing has changed

and what do you think the messages mean when they say "by using this application you allow it to used your data to share with partner" or whatever it says?


people are spreading this message without discrimination and it scares me how quickly nonsense spreads

Just so that everyone know's in advance, me and the advertising execs that make the Churchill insurance ad are going to copy and paste Seans facebook pic onto the nodding dog. We feel that this will make a much more realistic platform for a company that always likes to lull it's customers into a false sense of security and then baffle them senseless futher down the line.


Just thought you'd like to know.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Wow I had no idea they give you 5% in perfume for your accommodation. You're right, I need to travel more. 
    • Do none of you go abroad.  Tourist taxes are really common in continental Europe and do vary a lot city by city. They are collected by the hotels/rental apartments. They are usually a  tiny part of your holiday costs.  In Narbonne recently we paid €1.30 per person per night.  The next town we went to charge 80 cents per person per night. By comparison Cologne is 5% of your accomodation.
    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...