Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Easties EL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I own a 2nd hand car that belongs to Jarvis Cocker



A. This thread is called "Forumite signatures..." so where does JC fit in ?


B. So how do you "own" it if it belongs to him ?


C. Is this some sort of exhibition of possession Touretts ?

I put my signature in just to remind people to do reeeeally important stuff.

I've worked in places where - when the person had not done the will thing - it reeeeeeeally mattered and caused so much grief for people as a result. So not apologising for it. The rest is just good socially aware stuff.

Signatures are awful. And after the mildly amusing, forgivable adverts and worthy causes we have the worst kind:


Those that say "I'm intelligent yet blessed with subtle wit and political nous" and as Sean Mac has demonstrated, even the forum's old guard can get it horribly wrong. Only a few days ago the self-styled forum stalwart was found finishing off posts about Bins on Goodrich Road with the gem "Sedition never entertained".


Thankfully now removed. ;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...