Jump to content

Recommended Posts

brum wrote:


Blame it on the last ice age - that's when the geology was formed, apparently.


Not really - the ice stopped at the terminal moraine (a sort of ridge pushed forward by the snout of the ice sheet) in Finchley. It never got south of that point. Diverted the Thames to its present location, though - before that it probably reached the sea somewhere near Maldon in Essex.

charliecharlie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> love the map kford

>

> hhhmmmm 70 years thinking about it so far

> that should mean we only need only another 30

> years to raise the funding, 15 more planning it,

> 20 to build it, 5 more to debate what to call it

> and we should have it up and running 2079...


I was going to say to the OP that she'll be e pensioner before anything happens. But you've said it in another way.


But I do admire her pluck. Go for it Nikki!

Well played nikki, lets make this happen.


Like with many obstacles they can be overcome if the will power is there. The benefits for Camberwell and ED would be significant including house prices.


Can't belive peopple have stood by for so long and not made this a real issue, its about time in London we stood up for something close to home!

I cant believe that with all the tunnelling experience we have in this country (The Underground itself, the Channel, Tom, Dick & Harry) we can't build a tunnel between the Elephant and Camberwell Green and possibly beyond. I did say in a previous post that if you look at a map the next logical stop is Denmark Hill, then North Dulwich, Sydenham Hill (South Dulwich) and then Crystal Palace to join up with the new East London Line extension. We need SMB to get this through.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
    • Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
    • 1. No he's not, he made a pigs ear of things, his leadership was poor and his behaviour was unbecoming of the highest office in the land.  2. No they don't,  he was a prime buffoon 3. Not a messiah, in no way. He caused great damage to both the Party and Country after three years of differing by May. The only thing he completed was B  r  e  x  i  t.  Are we paying the price. Don't ask me, I was in an induced coma at the time, fighting for my own life.    
    • My comment is trying to not take any political side but rather be objective on what I see, hear and read. If the Government made a positive difference to people's lives, people would be pro this Govt, but sadly the majority don't see an improvement since they have been in Office, but rather the opposite so people's opinions of the Government are poor.  I think if you did a straw poll of users on here, the result for those in favour of the Government is likely to be unfavourable, but I may be totally wrong, quite possible. No one I speak or am in contact with has a single good word to say about the current Administration. In fact the calls for a General Election just become stronger and stronger. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...