Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I kind of love the ides of the temporary tattoo sleeve... the chance to have a different tattoo any time on a whim

http://www.giftsupplying.com/product/pic/tattoosleeve.jpg

but... then again is that a bit like making graffiti legal... sort of takes the meaning out of it


ie

tattoos = permanent

graffiti = done under cover of darkness to avoid arrest

I like tattoos, even Amy Winehouse's tattoos and I think most people who have tattoos don't really give a crap about the opinions of people who don't like them. I hate mediocre 'Gap' type clothes, but thousands of people think it's ok to walk about looking bland and boring. I wouldn't think it was my place to turn my nose up at them and criticise them for their clothes and lifestyle choices, but anti-tat people think it's acceptable to not just criticise people with tattoos, but do it in a pretty sneering way.


I'm just glad i'm me, tattos, piercings and all; and not you judgemental tat-haters.

citizenED Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I love the way that some have justified getting

> tattoos by claiming that they have personal

> meaning. Wouldn't the same image in a book or in a

> picture on the wall would have the same meaning? I

> really like some tattoos, but pretty much detest

> others. Often it correlates with the atractiveness

> of the person thus tattooed.


Sorry to say CitizenEd that is just a load of nonsense, I know why I have tattoos and I dont have to justify myself to anyone. To say "Wouldnt the same image in a book have the same meaning" No its does not. I have just finished 2 hours of MSc critique and every so often I look at the rosary on my foot when I am feeling low and tired and it empowers me. So unless you understand and feel how I feel about my tattoos, then please do not compare it to looking at a book.

I have always felt that a tattoo brand's you, and while at the moment they seem to have become popular with various celebs they always hint at low life behaviour like having a bruiser dog instead of a pooch which is acceptable.


My sister worked in a hospital for years and the major part of her time was spent organising the removal of tattoo's where people had been revolted by there own stupidity at their "body art". Even when they are removed you can see where they were, as the skin is not the same after the op.


Guys with lots of tattoo's often suggests time in prison. I had never seen a woman with a tattoo until fairly recently, as it was generally considered to be for macho bad boys.


Nope, I think they are best left to someone else, but they are certainly not for me, not even for free.

daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maybe it was being rough and ready and being able

> to give a good seeing to .. oh my :))


------------------------------------------------------



Maybee he had one on his "appendage" for ladies eyes only.......





W**F

I've got a Chinese imperial dragon on my upper right arm when I was 17 I'm being deadly serious when I say I got it because I was bored and there was nothing else to do. So about an hour later I was sitting in the Tattooists chair and half way through the twin towers were attacked. No, I'll never forget that day.


Absolutely no spiritual reason or any other besides that for it being there. I've never regretted it either.


However,


I don't sympathise one bit when you get these idiots who have their entire arms or half their face done and moan when they're turned down at a job interview.


Not into piercings one bit or those tunnel earings.

OHMYGOD!!!


VILE, VILE, VILE - (stomps foot).


Tattoos are not for everyone, they are very Trailor Trash/Jeremy Kyle Show in my opinion.


I can see what some people are saying about having a childs name as a tattoo - but there are so many other things that can be done - that are not so permanent.


Check out these fabulous trinkets from Chambers and Beau.


http://chambersandbeau.com/writeable/uploads/images/resized/269w_14044_pendant-test2-web.jpg


They personalise these super necklaces with your poppets' names and your husband's name - divine!

dulwichmum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OHMYGOD!!!

>

> VILE, VILE, VILE - (stomps foot).

>

> Tattoos are not for everyone, they are very

> Trailor Trash/Jeremy Kyle Show in my opinion.

>

> I can see what some people are saying about having

> a childs name as a tattoo - but there are so many

> other things that can be done - that are not so

> permanent.



Like Dr Barnados, LOL

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why would you have to look for "a good reason to not vote for the greens"? What a very strange thing to say. Would you like to explain your logic?
    • Hi All, Looking for recommendations in the following professions. Ideally based locally. -Psychiatrist -Psychologist  -Therapist (EMDR) -Child Psychiatrist ADHD and ASD exp - ideal Any information would be appriciated. C
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...