Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey, I had a friend who wore a silver band on her wedding finger and wondered why she couldn't get a man.


When I pointed out the obvious, she said she couldn't take it off because it would be bad luck.


:))


Good luck bbkings, and just go for it - what's the worst that could happen? A bit of embarrassment.

FluffyGalore Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If she's not wearing any rings then it's game on

> for you, doesn't matter if she says she's got a

> BF; no rings, no strings :-) Good luck.



and what if she happens to be a lesbian in a long-term relationship?;-)

and what if she happens to be a lesbian in a long-term relationship?


She will be flattered by the attention nonetheless and go home and brag to her GF that some guy chatted her up in the park. Her GF may become terrified that she may lose her, and to a man, and promptly propose. :))

This is interesting as these are traits I see in myself too :-)


But Jumpinjackflashes description matches pretty well, anyway slept on all the comments and am going to take the plunge next time whether she's married with child or not, if nothing else, just to make her day.

FluffyGalore Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> and what if she happens to be a lesbian in a

> long-term relationship?

>

> She will be flattered by the attention nonetheless

> and go home and brag to her GF that some guy

> chatted her up in the park. Her GF may become

> terrified that she may lose her, and to a man, and

> promptly propose. :))



Or she may knee him in the groin, poke his eyes out and set the dog on him...oooh gosh, you've got me going now!

monica Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What a lovely story, I Agree with whoever

> suggested striking up a conversation about her

> lovely dog, go for it life is too short for ifs

> and buts.(Im married and totally in love, but I

> have a crush and its lovely but strange because I

> have a crush at my age>:D<)


Does your husband know?

FluffyGalore Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or she may knee him in the groin, poke his eyes

> out and set the dog on him...oooh gosh, you've got

> me going now!

>

> Can't say I've ever done that to a man who's tried

> to chat me up, even though a few of them had been

> beaten with he ugly stick.



I initially read that as you beat them with their own ugly sticks.

bbkings Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is interesting as these are traits I see in

> myself too :-)

>

> But Jumpinjackflashes description matches pretty

> well, anyway slept on all the comments and am

> going to take the plunge next time whether she's

> married with child or not, if nothing else, just

> to make her day.


Bad move there BB, ignore the life style coaches on here telling you to'go for it' and 'faint heart never won fair maid'.

Shadenfreude junkies all of them.

No, worship her from afar and forever wonder what might have been. Play sad songs on the stereo and have a little weep in an ecstacy of melancholy.

You'll probably get a few songs/poems/short stories out of it.

Or a limerick anyway.

jumpinjackflash Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> monica Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What a lovely story, I Agree with whoever

> > suggested striking up a conversation about her

> > lovely dog, go for it life is too short for ifs

> > and buts.(Im married and totally in love, but I

> > have a crush and its lovely but strange because

> I

> > have a crush at my age>:D

> Does your husband know?



Well?;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, it's a missed opportunity, then the government could postpone elections in London as well, as they have done (spuriously by the 'request' of the local authority) across vulnerable swathes of the country. 
    • Hi all The EDF summary email is currently sent on Sunday to inform me of everything relevant for the weekend I've now missed.   Would anyone else find it useful to have the notification sent on Thursday or Friday instead?  David
    • Bit nerdy. But the traditional form of England/Wales local government was based on committees with themehmbers in proportion to the respective political parties numbers.  Blair government introduced for councils that chose it cabinet structure where the majority hold roles covering each of  former committee would decide/confirm. Additionally a Blair option for a super council leader Mayoral role such as Lewisham rather than ceremonial mayoral role who chairs council Council Assemblies of all councils. A number of councils have since moved from exec Mayoral role to cabinet basis.  Without Councillors being elected via a Proportional Voting system I personally would prefer to see a return to committee decision making structure. It ensures all Councillors have to know what they're doing rather than the ruling party leaving it to a few cabinet members and the rest just voting at Council Assemblies how they/re told. Just a personal view. 
    • With the elections coming up soon, it's interesting to note that residents over the boundary in Lewisham have a different system of local government than Southwark. Lewisham has a directly elected Executive Mayor while Southwark has kept a traditional local authority structure. Nothing is perfect, but I think Lewisham made a mistake with the Executive Mayor in that it blurs the legislative branch and executive branch of governance, and makes serious scrutiny of decisions less likely to happen - especially in a Borough like Lewisham which is essentially a one-party state. None of the political parties are offering any major reforms of local government for London, which is very disappointing since it seems obvious that having 33 local authorities - all with their own internal administrations - is not a good way to run things, when most of them are struggling even to maintain basic services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...