Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We've all sorts of threads ranging to the dizzy heights of football and thanks to Daizie, felatio. We haven't, so far, discussed the mysterious matters of Bond, and what it is to be Bond. Apart from the awesome special effects and a full stable awe inspiring skirt, why hasn't there been serious and well presented debate on the matters of Bond.


Favourite title.

Favourite bitch.

Favourite Villain.

Favourite drink.


Best soundtrack for me has to be Tina Turner's Goldeneye.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7556-its-wolf-bigbadwolf/
Share on other sites

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> er......GnR? PM&W shuuurely?



Originally, yes - but the GnR cover is fantastic.


I'm very much a Bond person, although I though the last one was bloody awful.


Title - the English translation of the Bond family motto (Orbis Non Suficit): The World is Not Enough...

Bitch - Fiona Volpe

Villain - too hard to choose... the cartoon supervillany of the early ones, or Renard the doomed henchman?

Drink - As much as the vintage champers must be a fun tipple, surely it's not a Bond without a vodka martini?


...and I'll add to the categories for consideration

Favourite Vehicle?

Favourite Gadget?

Favourite cheesy line?

The films? Fleming doesn't deserve the films.


"Bond walked with naked feet across the cool Island sand, noting how easily it yielded to the sole of a white foot. The sweet, feral smell of negress sweat was still ripe on the collar of his Savile Row linen shirt. The maid had not submitted easily, used as she was to the bloated tourists and businessmen that usually stayed at the hotel. But she'd never met a white man like Bond before and now she came to him in the night, gibbering in patois in response to his firm corrective touch. "Sorry, dear," Bond had murmured as he snapped her glistening neck... wanketywankcoughsplutterpullpullohIsay..etcetc..."

Sean Connery was, by far, the best Bond. He also had the hairiest chest of all the 007's.


http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/PeraSyte603/SeanConnery.png


Then, for some reason, this happened.


http://www.thefakelife.com/blog/uploaded_images/SeanConnery-775481.jpg


The mind boggles.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...