Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bemusED Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This morning though, three modest height mature

> trees had been cut down to waist level.?



I love trees as much as the next tree hugger BUT.


In some streets there are too many big trees which have been neglected and these big trees are undermining foundations the council should have a plan to remove the big trees and replace them with new but I guess they don't want to spend the money.


I've got two trees outside both are way too big and should be cut down and replaced.


There are signs of cracking in my front wall and who takes the blame NOT Southwark?

Maybe they're realising that they need to do something but it?s a little late for a lot of us.


James can you please ask who ever is responsible to stop planting trees like the Sycamore from being planted they self seed and have a lot of rapid leaf and seed drop in a short time causing blocked drains they really should not be planted outside peoples houses.


Who would I contact to ask to have these trees replaced?

Hi peckhamboy,

The up lighters just outside East dulwich station should be working from 17 December. Three weeks of contractors making slightly bigger holes than currently there and wiring up the new up lighters.


Hi Fazer71,

If you email me I'll happily look into your case which sounds as though something has gone seriously amiss.

Hi Chillaxed,

Sadly those ulighters were installed with no view to how they'd be maintained and uplighters are talking to a local electrician often problematic mainteance wise.


So we're getting all new LED up lighters. THey need slightly bigger holes etc.


Here's the fun part - they're programmeable to give different lighting effects. So I've asked for something seasonal and Christmassy. God knows what the council ighting engineers will make with such an imprecise brief but whatever I'm sure it will be fun.

Hi James


A bit of a moan about rubbish collecting I'm afraid. This morning the guys came and as we're three flats in a house we have 2 normal waste bins which today were full and had a couple of bags next to them for pick up. The guys left the bags next to the wheelie bins - which they had to move to get at the wheelie bins. Now given that collection is 2 every 2 weeks I suppose we'll fill our bins by a week saturday meaning more bags will be left ad infinitum we'll have a tip in our front garden.


It's happened before and last time I spoke to someone in the waset department I got some short shrift on how bags will only be collected if they're in the bins - seriously which jobsworth wrote this policy as it only causing waste to pile up on our streets!

Hi Andybol,

That sounds daft.

If you email your precise address I'll ask officers to ensure the crew that covers your road shows a little more flexibility and initiative.


NB. They have been berated for taking items next to wheelie bins away that werent out for rubbish collections. So that might have made them overly cautious.

I totally agree with the above post on belvoir road . I too live on the road and have done for nearly 11 years and now have 2 young children and a dog . it is a nightmare on the school run just trying to get all in the car safely without being hit by speeding passers by !I do feel the speed at which cars come down here is utter madness !

Hi James,


I just found out that the 100hrs pharmacy at Dulwich Medical Centre on Crystal Palace Road has been approved by the PCP(?) However it says that DMC still need to apply to the local authority for permission to use the premises as 100hrs. Can people who live close to DMC have their say as part of the process of the local authority reviewing the application?


Thank you!

Hi Mutrik,

That is shocking.

My understanding is that the 100 hours pharmacy on Crystal Palace Road would still need planning permission. So we all need to be vigilant for any notice of a planning application and ensure if council officials were minded to grant permission that it at least goes before a planning committee to be decided.


If you're a patient of DMC let them know what you think - I suspect it might well push some people to find a different more community minded practice.

Hi Andybol,

Many thanks for reporting it.


Hi dimples,

I'm sorry to hear Belvoir is suffering from speeding vehicles.

This road is in College ward. Sadly your councillors haven't helped the local College ward Safer Neighbourhood Police Team by providing speed (guns) measuring devices.


Probably best to contact the College ward SNT Police on 020 8721 2442 or

Also if you're free this Wesdnesday between 7pm and 7.3-pm they'll be outside 507 Lordship Lane.

Noting your new email campaign for this "new school" business James, is there somewhere to register if we do not want a school on the hospital site?

I would have thought, given the current threat to Lewisham A&E and that Kings is already bursting, consideration and future planning for further healthcare should be in place and the hospital space would be ideal and more appropriate rather than a school. Afterall, over the years, if schools werent closed in the first place there would have been plenty of space for LOCAL people. No?

Hi KalamityKel,

Interesting point. When a planning application is made you should have opportunities to object.


The hospital site from memory is 27,000m2 and typically a new primary school would apparently be around 5,000m2.

Hi James


The work that that took place to some of teh pavements on Derent Grove have resulted in rubble being left in the road in several places along the length of the road, exacerbating the parking diffciulties and presenting a potential hazard. Given that no work appeared to take place last week, nor as far as I am aware any effort by the contractor to remove the rubble, do you have any way of finding out what's happening? There was very little notice given that any work was going to take place and the continued disruption is rather frustrating.


best wishes

Thanks bluesky for highlighting this.

Several aspects that trouble me. That un barriered piles of rubble etc remain which implies contractors who havent got a clue how they're legally required to work on public highway areas. Quite likely thre works were undertaken to a poor quality and will need redoing sooner than you'd normally expect.

Eitherway, council officials are on the case.

This isn't a request for help, but I notice in the latest edition of Southwark Life that in the article on markets it says that North Cross Road market is "now open Monday to Saturday, opening times vary".


I live just round the corner, and I don't recall seeing any stalls there from Monday to Thursday. Is it really open on those days, or was that a mistake?

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks James, hopefully people won't travel across

> Southwark during the week to find no stalls there!



Does this mean that people can apply for a stall on weekdays, and if so where could they set up

as cars are parked there on those days ??


Fox.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...