Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thats a shame as my missus (mum to be) was looking for somewhere to go swimming, is there anywhere that has specific mum to be swim sessions locally? Do they even exist as i am sure she would like to meet up with some other girls in the same boat and get some time with a weightless bump.
  • 2 weeks later...

Hi EDmummy,

The Dulwich Pool on East Dulwich Road is a ?6.5M rebuil/renovation project.

The new entrance on Crystal Palace Road and complete rebuilt pool and new studios should be opening late winter/early spring 2010. The pool will be slightly shortened from 27m to 25m so it can hold school swimming events. This will also result in being able to walk around all sides of the pool. The pool roof will also be insulated along with all the other roof spaces, windows etc. So considerable more energy efficient.

The gym will then be moved to the new dance studios so the gym hall and building facing East dulwich Road can then be renovated. This will take until January 2011.


Hi SteveT,

As the main building is listed it can't be demolished and started afresh. Equally, as the Peckham Pool leaked like a sieve and costs ?2M and 2 years to fix it isn't a set of events I'd wish to repeat.

The project has been complicated by finding some asbestos buried away in the building which obviously has to removed in a completely safe way. Which it has. It also means the work has to be done very carefully in case further is found. Not something to be rushed.

'Considerably more effcient' you say. Please don't let the new lagging mean that the temperature will be even more stifling. The pool doesn't need to be so warm, and neither does the ambient temperature. Could you find out whether there is a legal minimum, and if so, make sure they keep it to that temp, or if not, persuade them to keep it a degree on the cooler side. Sweating while in water is interesting, but ultimately uncomfortable!

That is even worse than I thought, now reduced to 25metres, is it going to be any wider to increase the number of lanes


and capacity Mr Barber?


Will it have a new filtration system installed, so that it no longer resembles swimming in the dregs of a washing machine?

Mr Barber.

I thought it was 50m for an olympic size pool Ted Max, and you can only use the 25 for school events. It would not be comparable because of the extra turn distorting the finishing times.


My complaint was Ted that spending all that money and it did not increase the length and capacity of the pool, which judging by the amount of use it gets would have been an obvious way to go.


I do not see what an athletics track skanky or otherwise has to do with it, but I guess you know best.

Hi SteveT,

Paris has more 50m pools than the UK.

UK local government doesn't have the money to build or run 50m Olympic sized pools and really not sure we want the new best practice ones where they are minimum of 3m for the entire length. Even to keep the Crystal Palace National Sports Centre the London Developement Agency had to step in to save it.


The new East Dulwich pool will have all new filtration, heating, air circulation, changing rooms, dance studios, cafe, gym, etc. Total cost ?6.5M. This is not small beer or half measures. It is a huge investment in a local East Dulwich facility.

Councillor Barber wrote:-

The new East Dulwich pool will have all new filtration, heating, air circulation, changing rooms, dance studios, cafe, gym, etc. Total cost ?6.5M. This is not small beer or half measures. It is a huge investment in a local East Dulwich facility.



It sounds wonderful, pity about the pool being smaller, but good to hear that the new smaller pool will have decent filtration.


I quite agree it is not small beer or half measures, it is a very expensive smaller pool.


Why they are changing the present gym, which in my opinion is the best around, as it has high ceilings and is never stuffy, I cannot understand.

I thought it was 50m for an olympic size pool Ted Max, and you can only use the 25 for school events. It would not be comparable because of the extra turn distorting the finishing times.


My complaint was Ted that spending all that money and it did not increase the length and capacity of the pool, which judging by the amount of use it gets would have been an obvious way to go.


I do not see what an athletics track skanky or otherwise has to do with it, but I guess you know best.



SteveT - Slightly snippy at the end there? Not sure why.


You are right that 50m is what they swim in the Olympics. What I wrote is that 25m is normal for short course championships. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FINA_World_Swimming_Championships_(25_m)


Therefore they are regulating the pool to a standard length - hence the analogy to the athletics track.

Hi SteveT,

?6.5M is building lots of new space, renovating everything else. That's a lot of renovated space and the pool is a small eliminate of the space involved. Slightly complicated sorting out the listed parts such as the bath rooms.

The gym will be temporily moved but the current gym space - the old first class 33m pool hall - will be returned to gym use once it has been fully renovated and new changing rooms installed.


We're also finalising the Camberwell centre renovations. They should start once Dulwich centre completed. The remaining Southwark Council leisure/sports centres have plans around modernisation. The majority will be completed by the London Olympics.

Certainly was/are two pools.


Front pool was much grander. Larger pool with viewing balcony, diving boards & much larger changing lockers.

Pool is probably still there under the gym. Balcony still in situ.


Rear pool was much smaller, but was modernised whilst front pool wasn't.

Could well be that rear pool was for the "workers" certainly as you walked down the long corridor to the rear pool, there were side rooms containing actual Baths, which I'm sure was aimed at the poorer local residents. Think I've even seen a price list somewhere:

Bath & soap xd

Bath, soap & 2 towels xxd

That sort of thing....


Larger front pool, was used less than the rear pool in later years, as during the winter it was boarded over & used for dances, boxing & bowls & now as a gym of course.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.”
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...