Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Deepest apologies for returning to the topic of the thread. Quids you may be surprised to hear this! but I have read a Dan Brown book once, although I'm not stupid enough to pay to buy a hardcover and lug it around. The furthest I'd go would be to borrow a paperback.


I think there's room in the world for a well-plotted thriller, with mysteries that are difficult to untangle. Shame they so often seem to go with silly conspiracy theories and cardboard characters, though.

I don't mind admitting that I actually rather enjoyed Angels & Demons, which I acttually read before the Da Vinci Code, but after all the DC hype. What is not to enjoy, it's a fun story, and easy reading. Da Vinci Code was dull, and completely overrated.


The problem is that people then start talking like the books are literary greats, and that gets up the nose of some people.


Harry Potter books are kids books, which then got popular, so increasingly became aimed at an older audience. I personally think they are a good laugh, but again, it doesn't mean I think that annoying woman is some literary genius, more a woman who took an old idea, and expanded on it with some skill.

I guess it's about how impossible it is to work out what will cPture the public imagination.


I grew up enjoying lots of boys-with-magic-powers type books, what's not to love. But there are hundreds of them, HP is no better or worse, so I'm at a total loss why it did so well.


I've read any number of hackneyed thrillers I picked up at the airport and threw into a bin at the other end (perhaps people missing the bin and hitting the bench is where the myth comes from TM). I enjoy not having to think when on a plane tired and trying to pretend I'm not in a high explosive building 40000 ft of the floor.

Many of those thrillers have dealt with Templars and Gnostics and religion (I think I mentioned before a very enjoyable one about Jesus being alive and well and drug dealing in Sydney) so nowt wrong with these books per se.


But again I've non idea why DVC did so well, it's bizarre, like HP before it it is utterly derivative and averagely written.

I guess mcdonalds proves you don't need to be good to be popular but I hate adults telling me I MUST read HP or I have no imagination, or the loons who think there is some truth in DVC.

For goodness sake I barely believe Jesus existed and certainly don't believe in his divinity, why would I care if he shagged someone?


Anyway Eco's Foucault's Pendilum should be prescribed as the perfect antidote to anyone infected by DVC syndrome. Pacy, thrilling, intellignet, amusing and brilliantly written, for once what really is not to like?

Ruth Kelly tried to kill you?


I think people like to feel part of something bigger - and there comes a point where it feels perverse not to have read something. I can't see the harm in it. I suppose you can argue that publishers cut their lists to a few banker genres and stop investing in new writing.


But there still seem to be plenty of books piled up in Chener, Review, and so on that haven't rolled out of a lorry straight onto Tesco's 20% off shelf.


(Naturally I haven't read any Rowling or Brown myself, chiefly spending my time at the moment reading 19th Century Ghazals in the original Urdu)

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Us I worked with an opus dei chap for five years

> and he never once tried to kill ke despite my

> regular blaspheming.

> Though on the other side of the coin...Ruth

> Kelly....


They're more underhanded than that. They like to hack forum accounts in order to make it look like their opponents are unable to spell/construct a sentence. Sinister stuff.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyway Eco's Foucault's Pendilum should be

> prescribed as the perfect antidote to anyone

> infected by DVC syndrome. Pacy, thrilling,

> intellignet, amusing and brilliantly written, for

> once what really is not to like?


A great book, but bloody hard work, I was constantly having to look up words in the dictionary and read sentences 3 or 4 times to work out what they had said... not good for the ego.

The Name of the Rose and Foucault's Pendulum were masterpieces in my view. I found Eco's subsequent novels somewhat disappointing.


In real life professor Eco is a semiotician: one who studies signs and symbols and their meaning. Dan Brown describes Robert Langdon as a ?symbologist,? which is a clumsy term for semiotician.


My guess is that Brown chose symbologist to obscure the influence Eco had on his work.

Piers, I dare say that the best rock guitarist in the world, is someone we've never heard of, who plays in local pubs. The best song in the world, is probably something written by some guy we've never heard of, and quite likely, the best thriller ever written is sitting on a publisher's desk somewhere, and will never see the shelves of WH Smith's.


Dan Brown and J K Rowling got lucky, just like all the bands that make it, and the songwriters who happen to get heard by the right person on the right night.


They then got pushed by clever marketing people.


Look at Blair Witch, what a load of gash, but half the world thought it was a documentary!

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Quids you may be surprised to hear

this! but I have read a Dan Brown book once,


Although you can't see us Moos, the rest of the EDF have become a living Bateman cartoon at hearing this.

My monocle has caromed off the ceiling, my tincture has splashed all over the founder's portrait and I've bitten through the stem of my favourite Meerschaum.

I wonder how anyone else reacted?

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Although you can't see us Moos, the rest of the

> EDF have become a living Bateman cartoon at

> hearing this.

> My monocle has caromed off the ceiling, my

> tincture has splashed all over the founder's

> portrait and I've bitten through the stem of my

> favourite Meerschaum.

> I wonder how anyone else reacted?


Dear Hona, I sincerely apologise for having ruffled your equilibrium. Please imagine a cool, smooth Moosian hand on your fevered brow, stroking away your discombobulation.


I'm sure no-one else so much as swirled their G&Ts at the news. I have confessed to C2 tastes before now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I was sitting on the park bench yesterday opposite north Dulwich station and found an Apple Watch hanging off the corner. I have brought it home and charged it hoping that someone might use ‘find my’ to locate it. Equally happy to be contacted this way to return it to the rightful lender / they just need to say what colour/kind of strap it has. If you can think of a better way to return it / find its owner then please advise. And/or feel free to share on other local fora. 
    • How many are there in your racist category?
    • Precisely DR it’s entirely understandable to conclude one is so disillusioned by Labour for Tories, it must be time for someone else  That  is an entirely reasonable position But if the next step is to then transfer your vote to a party full of charlatans, snake oil salespeople and racists? Then  you stop being reasonable and start being thick and/or racist i understood why Tories took power in 2010. I feared it was an error but I wasn’t castigating people who voted for them tories (then, not now) and Labour are hamstrung not by civil service or EU but by a weird media and a weird voting system in an age of social media.  The answers don’t seem to be coming from them yet but voting reform will only damage the country internationally and internally  the Tories may yet regain power but are currently led by a madwoman, with a madman positioning himself to take over. Will take years for them to sort themselves out labour are making errors all over the shop but are at least in the ballpark of sane governanc.  In no way should this give them a free pass but in 2025 there genuinely isn’t anyone better  (and current polling for reform is meaningless - in any general election be it 4 years or 4 months their lack of accountability and standards will become all too clear)
    • > Or else it's a relatively thin trunk? Or a rather thick old trunk, covered in leaf growth?  Look at the damage caused to the end and right hand railings.  NewWave, any chance  of loading your neighbour's photo here?   Or anyone else with some good focused photos, from various viewpoints if possible?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...