Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Grok Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was told by the security guard that the basket

> contained some raw steak, tea bags, and sweets.

> Sounds like a basket of food a skint dad may have

> taken when pushed to the limits by a Govt that is

> trying to cut IN WORK benefits.



You'll break your knees making that massive leap to a conclusion. You could just as easily infer that it was a terrorist, drug dealer, kleptomaniac, Father Christmas impersonator or public schoolboy.


It must be satisfying being able to see evidence for your world view in any action, no matter whether there's any logical basis for that inference or not.

Cannot see why the Co-op would be that concerned abort people nicking some of their produce.


1/2 of it is at its use by date or over its best by date. Saves them the trouble of having to dispose of it.


Perhaps they (and other supermarkets) should have a 'Please Help Yourself' section.


Foxy.

aerie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or Lady Isobel Barnett, years ago, tuna I think,

> with the aid of a poacher's bag. And she was a JP.

> Giving credence to the theory mooted here that if

> it's in you to steal you will - unlike most people

> who patiently queue in the Coop.



Poor Lady Barnett subsequently killed herself because of the shame of the publicity.


And since she clearly didn't need to steal groceries, was probably genuinely ill or forgetful.

exactly Azira, as per my point that LIB was wearing a poacher's bag inside her coat, and yes she committed suicide by electrocution, proving that she shoplifted for kicks. Not because there was a tory covernment: however, why is it that from 5-6 pm peak time there are only 2 cashiers operating at the Coop
Sounds more like deep depression. I've worked retail security in the past and have seen it all, for kicks/laugh, desperation, need, idiocy, drunk- retail security is more about visual presence and health and safety of staff and customers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...