Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well Alan you are determined to stir the proverbial sh*t aren't you? Your "link" to a shoot-to-kill article about a farmer and a stray dog worrying his sheep is entirely gratuitous (also irrelevant to the issue at hand and irksome to boot).


All right-thinking people would do well to grab a copy of the local paper this evening - the council has admitted to being wholly wrong in its erection of signage without due process being observed. Hooray and a big slobbery happy dog lick to all who signed up to the petition.


As to balls - is that the mark of a "real man"? Balls to you mate.

ChavWivaLawDegree - For the record, I am a lover of dogs, generally speaking, including staffie types (I love their stocky bodies and like to kiss their smiley faces), but nonetheless, I stand by my right to judge a dog, at least in part by its owner. Therefore, sadly, the jury is still out for poor old Hannibal.
ChavWivaLawDegree - Is your dog Hannibal named after John "Hannibal" Smith, leader of The A-Team or Hannibal Lecter, the infamous cannibalistic serial killer? My guess is the latter and if so didn't you think that calling a dog after a killer gives off a certain impression? I may be wrong and you've named it after the Hannibal who's famous for crossing the Alps with elephants but as most people know Hannibal Lecter, the twisted, psychopathic murderer, surely calling that name across a park does not install a feeling of loving warmth amongst those in earshot?

This is a tough one.

1. Dogs need to exercise and run around. The owner also has the right to walk with his pet if kept under control (lead not a necessity).

2. They must not encroach on the the general publics / non-dog owning space or safety.

3. Dangerous dogs need to be better controlled / policed.

4. Failing to exercise dogs properly can result in agressive behavior

5. Is keeping a dog in London such a great idea anyway?


I see both sides here, but dog owners as a whole need to brow beat their thuggish element into toeing the line to prevent the majority suffering for the minority.

Personally, I wouls like to see a license scheme brought into place for all pet ownership...

"dog owners as a whole need to brow beat their thuggish element into toeing the line to prevent the majority suffering for the minority"


Totally agree with most of your points Tom but why are good dog-owners responsible for "browbeating" bad dog owners? Are good drivers responsible for making bad drivers behave? Are decent football supporters responsible for policing bad ones?


And what form will this "browbeating" take exactly? Are we to put them in the stocks? Denounce them ceremonially? Throw rotten tomatoes at them?

Actually, I will admit to being a 'brow beater of bad dog oweners'. For instance, for those who fail to scoop, I use my my school marmish, slightly patronising voice and say something to the effect of "Well, aren't you going to pick that up?????"(before running away at speed). And when I see some pathetic individual who has bought a dog she/ he clearly cannot control, I use the age old slow head shake and rolling of the eyes technique. I have also been known to say to whomever I am with, in a much louder than necessary voice "that poor dog, poor poor dog".


As satisfying as this may be in terms of my feelings of self righteousness, I suspect none of it works.

>

> Totally agree with most of your points Tom but why

> are good dog-owners responsible for "browbeating"

> bad dog owners? Are good drivers responsible for

> making bad drivers behave? Are decent football

> supporters responsible for policing bad ones?

>

Yes exactly. I know everyone is scared of being shot / stabbed for looking at someone the wrong way, but i make it a point of speaking to anyone for driving like a twat - or on a mobile. I will explain to people very clearly & simply if they are being racist / bullying why this is not acceptable. I will go into the street and stop the local lads charging up and down on their scooters by reasoning with their better judgement - which normally they have.

If you are non agressive, clear and reasoned, 99% of the time you get a positive agreement. Agression breeds agression. Most people know when they are being arses, and gently bringing them up on this is not something to be scared of.

When did failing to pick up your animal's poo, (or purchasing a dog on the basis of looks rather than temperament and subsequently being unable to control it), mean an individual is persecuted or marginalised?


Tom - from the drippingly patronising tone of your posting, I remain to be convinced of your ability to make others see the error of their ways any more than I am able.

Mark - He was called Animal wen i got him at 9 months old, but I felt a bit of a t**t shouting animal all over the park, and was worried some perv might interpret it as an invitation, so after discussing this worrying issue with another doggie fan, decided on Hannibal, cos it sounded similar enuf to Animal not to confuse him so he is named after the Alps/conqueror guy (more than the cannibal), although he's not actually conquered much to date.

Well I'm guessing that no dog owner is referring to the Huguenot methode because you secretly know it's right.


So to take one further step, what is it about dog owners that makes them believe that enslaving a wild animal (with limited grasp of what's going on around it) is alright?


Don't ducks go 'woooo mammy' to the first thing they see? Isn't the 'sit' command just a wierd pack/tribal thing? Isn't the 'man's best friend' thing just a reflection of an incapacity to deal with the unpredictability of the real thing? Controlling something that's weaker than you doesn't make anyone a better person.


C'mon kids - terminate the dogs (quickly and painlessly) and have real friends.


;-)

What I dislike, and I'm sure my posts over the months would attest to this, is bullying.


Owning a dog which looks like a killer dog, and naming it after a union leader that has a similar name to a mass murderer smacks of getting off on a technicality.


Staff or not, murderer or not, owning a dog like this is the same thing as bragging about slapping posh kids. I find it unacceptable. I suspect that those that wiggle their way through the testimony know it too, and every moment we empathise we fuel a peculiar egotism. None of us should accept this.

Brendan- As my brother predicted, all that book-lernin did me no good. I seem to have morphed into a chavvy eco-warrior/political activist. I also prefer silver to gold, sorry. Hannibal doesn't smoke, cos its bad for his health, but I draw the line at making him eat veggie dog food.


Incase you think I may not even be chavvy at all, I've got 4 (very loud and hyperactive)kids to 3 dads, a 5 month old granddaughter from my (married) 19 yr old daughter, a toyboy younger than my son, live in a council house and every 2nd word out of my mouth when I'm drunk or animated is a swear word. But I'm a very nice person really.


Huguenot - Get over it, the world is a scary place (except, so it seems, East Dulwich). I hate bullies too, but there are more ways of bullying than just physically. I grew up in a very violent area and had 2 younger brothers to protect so instead of being a victim I had to learn to fight. And for the record I actually said scaring condescending posh kids, not slapping them. I have never hit anyone who didn't hit me, my family or my friends first and I lost as many fights as I won, because it wasn't always 1 on 1, I am just someone who finds it hard to eat shit or back down from bullies, including up their arse, middle-class, moralising petty little Hitlers who love rules and laws restricting everyone elses freedoms because they have never got over their childhood fears of others.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...