Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Why is he getting so much stick for this? The letter was heartfelt and he took the time to write it personally. He only has one eye and that appears to be giving him problems at the moment so is it any wonder his handwriting his poor? Is the quality of his handwriting really that important? As for the mistake with the name, it's unfortunate but an honest one. How do we know the advisor who provided him with the details of this soldier's tragic death didn't spell the name wrong?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8568-gordon-browns-letter/
Share on other sites

He was set up by the sun and walked right into it.

Private eye showed cameron did some pretty dodgy deals with murdoch that brown wouldn't submit to, this is his commeuppance.

Murdoch is a horribly poisonous influence upon the politics if this country. I'm not a big fan of Brown either (though anythings better than Blair) but these seems a harsh and underhand and utterly tasteless ruse by the Sun.

He's blind in one eye and the other ones not too clever...if anyone else had written that letter it would be seen as a touching gesture. Can't say I'm a big fan myself but he didn't have to bother. Also a typed letter would be seen as too impersonal, so he can't win!
Also not a big GB fan but can't help thinking that this mother had done far more to insult her son's name by this than an unfortunate spelling mistake. I also wonder if she has made any money from it. Tabloids have their agenda and they will stoop to almost anything to achieve its aims.

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Having said that, he's the one sending the boys

> and girls out there (to their deaths).

> Let's not forget that.



Mates of mine over there love it! Just thought it was important to balance this argument out. Not every soldier is desparate to come home, only the ones in the press!

Is it true the Mother had a call from GB to discuss this and that she recorded the call on her Blackberry? (and he said sorry about 10 times during the call but she said this was not an apology)


She was obviously intending to / hoping to get him into further bother.


But then again she has lost her son and who are we to judge what she thinks fit and proper to do.

what the OP said.


The Sun should sort themselves out; it is not a story and that poor woman should be left to grieve without the machiavellian political machinations of the tabloid press. GB is only ok but I don't think he's done anything wrong other than not spell check effectively. end of.


edited for spelling - oh the irony!

Mind you, people do sign up it's true, but GB as chancellor is very much responsible for making them do it on a shoestring withou the equipment they need to do it right and with the highest margins of safety you can expect.

In a very real way he is personally responsible for many deaths, but balancing a nations books is a very different crime to sending our soldiers on pointless military adventures in the first place. TBs concsciemce should weigh much heavier than GBs.

I actually feel genuinely sorry for him, what he has tried to do without making a public fuss about it is a thoughtful and decent thing and it seems the media and most of the country are taking the piss out of him when he simply did not have to do it. The man is verging on blind for Gods sake and he knows the utter pain and devastation that comes from losing a child, so writing a letter to another parent for the loss of their child through his decisions must be very hard.


He has certainly gone up in my estimations and as for the mother recording the conversation and giving it to the Sun, i find that a bit low really.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I’m not sure the problems were caused by Everyone Active. They run perfectly good centres elsewhere, including the Queen Mum which until recently was my main pool. As far as I can remember the problems with the Dulwich pool started months after it was handed over to Southwark. But I might be wrong on that. I think there was a period when EA weren’t investing in it, pre hand back to Southwark, which is not surprising, but it was maintained to legal standards, I’m sure. I tried to swim at Dulwich a couple of weeks back. The water is far too hot. I would say it’s bordering on dangerous. I’m sure it’s within the tolerances etc but it is significantly warmer than JAGS (warm but still ok for session swims) which itself is way warmer than any of the other pools I swim at (Queen Mum, St Pancras, Oasis). I do wonder if all the problems they had with filters are related to the temp of the water. Peckham Pulse and Camberwell aren’t hot  so I think it’s a manager decision to run Dulwich so hot. Appreciate that the pool temp has nothing to do with the showers.
    • 13.11.25 - Had an internal blockage in our kitchen, which I had tried to fix myself but to no avail. Found TD Plumbfix Solutions via the East Dulwich Forum and within an hour of making contact, Troy had sent one of his team to have a look. They were absolutely brilliant, from start to finish. Kept me informed of what they were doing, gave me a few tips on future do and don'ts, and finished the job in such a way that should make it easy for me to fix should the problem arise in the future.  Intend using again in near future for a couple of small jobs and would wholly recommend this firm to anyone.
    • Typically the way 'family run businesses' operate is either to have family members continue the business, or to sell on, either as a site (in this instance) or as a going concern. Either which way this is the way the owners create a 'pension' from the business. The number of suggestions as to alternatives makes me feel that the market for small repairing garages locally may be well served, so selling on the site makes the best financial sense for the owners. It's a sign not of the times but of normal business realities. 
    • I agree it's a shame, but it is not a "sign of the times", unless you think that up to now people have never grown older and retired!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...