Jump to content

Recommended Posts

not in order of merit:

Keef because he was the first person to praise one of my posts

SeanMacGabhann my favourite pretend Irishman, not an ounce of brogue anywhere

*bob* is good value

Mockney Piers I find informative on lots of things

Michael Palaeologus an easy guy with a difficult name love his sparring with Dulwich mum

David Carnell for his youthful idealism

???? great name and his wicked humour makes me lol

Jah lush also has wicked humour makes me lol

Bignumber5 for his understated skill with difficult women, and his post writing like me, has made us both think things through

There are many others who I have missed out whose posts I have enjoyed enormously, but the one whom I must not forget is MARK for enabling us.

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-> Cockerney 'burbs! You cant vote for yourself! Vote

> for me, I will give you a Knighthood for it.

> Honest ;-)

........You seem like an Honest Guy and I'm a trusting Soul so you are,indeed,the recipient of my vote:)

SteveT said "Bignumber5 for his understated skill with difficult women"


Oh my, this made me laugh so much. Should BN5 feel pleased as punch or, allow his instinct for self-preservation to rule and claim to have no idea what Steve can be referring to?

Ms B what a nice thing to hear about oneself, I'm genuinely touched. Not just because you said a nice thing about me, but I enjoy your posts, in particular the way you've become a regular on the Song Game thread.

I like Keef because he's a musician and is therefore bound to be louche and rakish.

I like Louisa for her restraint in not responding recently when I twitted her gently and I suspect that her apparent spikinesss is just a carapace she adopts because she may have once been hurt in love.

I like Luv Peckham and the Gatecrasher of that ilk because they make me grin.

I like Muffintop because I hear she's very attractive for..............ever.

I like Moos for her flights of fancy. She's ginchy.

I like Jah Lush for his sterling taste in music. He's irie.

I like Michael Paleface and Hugenuts for the amusing variations one can make of their names. Actually that should read for their thought provoking posts. Also David Carnell and Mockney Piers for the same reason.

I like PeckhamRose too for the way she and DC managed to have a thread about a parking matter recently that was of some use.

That Sean Mac doesn't seem like a bad ol' shkin neither.


If I've forgotten anyone, buck your ruddy ideas up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
    • I don't have a beef with you. But I do have a beef with people who feel that a certain portion of the public's opinion isn't valid.  I don't like racism any more than anyone else here. But I do dislike the idea that an individual's thoughts, beliefs and feelings, no matter how much I may disagree with them, are somehow worth less than my own.  And I get the sense that that is what many disenfranchised voters are feeling - that they are being looked down upon as ignorant, racists who have no right to be in the conversation. And that's what brings out people on the margins and drives them towards extremes, like Reform.  Whether you like it or not, the racist, bigot, anti-european nextdoor to you has just as much say in the country as you do. Intellectual superiority is never going to bring them round. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...