Jump to content

(odds for the Dulwich & West Norwood seat at the next) General Election


Recommended Posts

If anyone has bothered to read any of the reports that come via Ian Duncan Smith's thinktank on poverty and social inclusion there are several interesting suggestions made to improve social mobility and prevent the poverty trap - from a Tory no less shock horror. Removing the 10% tax on low incomes is about the least progressive measure possible if your're seeking to help the low paid and encourage working over benefits.


Further, I can see the attraction of the status quo if you're employed by the state, and have benefitted by the last 5 years of excessive spending straight into the pay packet, and look forward to a final salary pensions. The rest of us tend to question why we need bullying outreach workers at 40k a pop.


Also probably not a popular view on here, but a government which has a "doors wide open" policy on immigration can hardly be seen as beneficial to the low paid as the net result is pressure on wages and competition for housing and healthcare.

Has anyone else received an unsolicited phone call from Labour in the last two days, received an unsolicited letter from Labour in the last two days, and seen this thread keep being bumped back to the top of the list for the last two days? No? Just me then.

I love the idea that there are odds on this election. I'm no gambler, or economist for that matter, but it seems a bit perverse to offer odds to the people who can detemine the result. Is the forum the place to arrange a betting syndicate? could the voters of DAWN all stick in ?10 each and then vote Lib dem? we'd all come away with ?200 and a new local MP who, according to Pugwash spends a lot of time working in the community!!!


Incidently the boundary changes are a bit more extensive than Bic basher highlighted, see


http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/dulwichandwestnorwood


the labour areas of Peckham rye ward and south camberwell which are transferrd into harriet harmans seat are replaced by other traditional labour wards around brixton. I really don't think the tories can win here

The whole are of political betting is pretty strange - it is not a big enough market (outside general elections bets on outright winner) for bookies to calculate accurate odds, therefore there are great opportunities to make money. The Lib dem odds at 20/1 seem a good example of this

No! That would be mad as we could influence that! But they offer odds on plenty of public votes such as X-factor, Strictly etc etc


As a student of gambling rather than Phsepholgy(???) I can say that Magpie's hit the nail on the head. For the big and normal sporting events the bookies odds tend to be pretty near to probability or they are also adjusted to reflect the risk on their book - eg England are normally shorter odds for the World Cup than they should be as so much money is bet on them, they can also try and attract money away from favourites by pushing odds out away from those with a decent chance to attract money in there. However, in araes where they really can't summon market expertise or traditional stats of results their odds are often out of kilter and in this case if you can really get the Lib Dems at 20s that represents real value IMO and I'm gonna look at it!


A few years back the odds on 'hole in ones' in golf were badly out of kilter and some shrewd punters made a killing - most bookies now have sophisticated dataanalysis teams and datamining programmes that try and keep their starting odds near to the stats and then adjust their books as the money comes in to maximise their profit. It's hardly done on the hoof and by indivuduals anymore just all stats.


PS If you do want to get a bet on England in the World Cup odds are normally better with an overseas bookmaker.

Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I imagine the majority of the Tory/Lib Dem vote for this seat will come from Dulwich with Labour the majority in the Lambeth wards.


For what it's worth I posted these figures last year:


Votes for the GLA Member for Lambeth & Southwark in East Dulwich Ward - 1st May 2008:


                      Lab        Tory      LibDem    Green

East Dulwich  37.0%   18.1%   24.0%     14.4%

Smiler Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What other things can you bet on?

>

> Quite fancy a trip to a betting establishment on

> Lordship Lane with the Bugaboo.


Bookies are the only buggyfree places on LL....by law

i disagree that these odds are out because of a lack of info. it'd be relatively easy to calculate probability of a result, based on average swing as per political polls; which in any case are sufficiently sophisticated these days as to narrow to postcodes. any aberration from this would be detected very rapidly by abnormal betting patterns, i.e. a preference of money bet on an outcome other than its ratio of probability would dictate.


if the above is not the case than the bookie is lazy and deserves to be taken to the cleaners!

I think the other issue is that theres not a big market for these kind of bets - bookies also align odds on the weight of money received for each outcome to protect themselve if, for example, they have to pay out for an England win. In a thin market they cannot protect themselves so readily against this.
  • 2 months later...

Hello everyone,


I've noticed this and other threads discussing local political candidates and odds at the next general election. I know most people on here and that I meet out on the doorstep think their vote will make no difference to the outcome and all the parties are the same.


This is certainly not the case for East Dulwich ward, which is in the Dulwich and West Norwood constituency. According to Electoral Calculus, we are not a safe seat and every vote will make a difference. Take a look

http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/conlist_c_e.html#DulwichandWestNorwood


Another frequent problem is that due to the boundary changes, many people aren?t sure what constituency they fall into. You can find out which ward you live in by putting your postcode in http://www.writetothem.com. The only Southwark wards in the D&WN constituency are College, Village and East Dulwich


I really do feel that it?s important voters know more about their local candidates, from all parties, and not just the party leaders. They?re the ones that can make the most difference in our area (I live here too). Rather than use the eastdulwichforum for electioneering in support for any party, I'd like to meet as many people with doubts and reservations in person.


I?ve been holding a number of events around the constituency where people can ask all the tough questions about me, what I've been doing locally and what I would do differently if I were the MP. The event for East Dulwich is tonight (25 Feb) at the Constitutional Club. It?s advertised on the events page here http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?6,423135.


Everyone is welcome to attend but it will be most useful to anyone who is genuinely undecided about who to vote for at the next general election.



Thank you and I look forward to meeting many of you over the next few weeks.


Kemi Adegoke

Conservative Parliamentary Candidate

Dulwich & West Norwood

www.dwnconservatives.com

www.kemi.adegoke.com

KemiAdegoke Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> I really do feel that it?s important voters know

> more about their local candidates, from all

> parties, and not just the party leaders.


Then how about supporting/promoting Democracy Club?

http://www.democracyclub.org.uk/

conceived by the ever wonderful Tom Steinberg and Co.


Meeting in Kennington tonight (one of many):


http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=339706801693

Hi Louisiana,

The Kennington meeting took place at the exact same time as the event I had been advertising on the forum, so couldn't make it. I'm very happy to attend any future ones, but I am not sure if politicians are welcome as we'll obviously be promoting ourselves!


I think democracyclub is a great idea. I've read through the project website, and will happily provide any examples of leaflets and literature that they want.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
    • Sadly, the price we now all pay for becoming a soft apologetic society.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...