Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm an ex North West Londoner and have been living in Brighton for the last 4 years. Due to work me and my boyfriend are moving back to London and have been offered a flat share in East Dulwich. I was just wondering if it's a nice place to live or not. If anyone could be kind enough to fill me in that would be fantastic.
Looking at this forum and the amount of whinging we do about the area, you might have your doubts. But we all keep living here, so there must be something in it! It largely depends how you quantify good, but the threads in one section or another should cover your specific criteria.
Yes. It's got a nice vibe about it. It's pleasant, people do say hello to you on the street especially if you say hello first. There are snobs and loads of NIMBYs and reactionaries, but there's good people too. And it's up to you to ask not what ED can do for you but what you can do for ED - Ooooohh yes.

Well it's cold out anyways....


We've moved about London a bit, NW, East, Central and SW before ending up in East Dulwich and we love it, for us it's a good mix of being close in to central London but still having a nice suburban feel with nice green spaces, local shops and friendly people.

There is a large baby population about tho, not that that worries us, Mrs Kiwi wants one of her own soonish so I guess that?s another plus for us.

dulwichmum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is super sweet, and you can visit West Dulwich

> et le village when you are in search of some

> culture and fabulousness!


Sorry but its got to be ED. The village and WD are, I'm afraid, rather dull.

Erm I have just had a re-think


So here's a few questions, now please be honest, answer the first thing that comes into your head.


In no way (well a little bit..) is this a


"oh look at 'er, who does she think she is ol' beefy"


or a


"Oh welcome, welcome , welcome do come in ,no prob.....ahhha so we will see you in church wont we"


type questioner/ personality test however.....



Here's "The Lucky Seven "



1. Your first thought on the word "Bugaboo"


2. On a bus when seated, how many of those seats would you ..."cover" roughly ?


3. Please tick one choice below


a. Waitrose ⎕


b. Iceland ⎕


4. How long would you be prepared to wait for a chop/sausage in the rain on a Saturday ( to the nearest hour is fine )


5. Honey


"Gales" or "Manuka"


6. Finish the following phrase.


" If Tessa Jowell said it , it must be.........."


7. "Reebok classics"....discuss




Many thanks for taking part.



W**F

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I wonder whether his political epiphany and renaissance will stretch to him using his real name - James Ashworth-McLintock - rather than the more proletarian 'McAsh'. To my mind, the only people who should have self-bestowed mononyms are very talented Brazilian footballers - Pele, Kaka, Ronaldinho - very talented female pop icons - Madonna, Shakira, Sonia - or Russian revolutionaries - Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky. Sonia's greatest hits compilation, 'Greatest Hits', is out now on vinyl & CD through PWL Recordings.
    • Probably more helpful to ask simply whether McCash was affiliated with the Greens before becoming a Labour councillor. Trying to explain your thought process and unravel your fevered imagination (particularly when it comes to local politica) is the kind of thing that might require several years of psychoanalysis.
    • made the mistake of going to megans twice in DV.. would never make that mistake a 3rd time. Ditto I liked Romeo Jones a lot they did lovely soups and sandwiches and coffee too and such loveley staff.
    • Aren't most marxists radical by default...and he was a self proclaimed marxist on his twitter feed for years but deleted it as I suspect it did not sit well at Labour HQ. The big worry for Labour might be that he takes votes away from them (but not enough for him to win a seat) especially as there may be a significant protest vote against them at the national level as they are making such a pig's ear of things. I suspect though Labour are glad to see the back of him - to say he was a thorn in their side is an understatement and his loss of the leadership of the council was clearly part of the purge Labour has been embarking on to rid itself of some of the far-left lunatic fringe that have blighted them for so long. The Greens of course are willingly take any disaffected far-left Labour rejects in the same way Reform are hovvering up the lunatic elements of the Tories. The fact he went in with both barrels on Labour is hardly surprisingly but wonderfully hypocritical of someone who thought they were about to lead a Labour council. My how politicians flip-flop to suit their own personal agenda. How long before he falls out with the Greens...where to then? Why do I think he had an affiliation with the Greens before he became a Labour councillor? Or did I imagine that?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...