Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Nisha tells me that the council arrived last night and gave her 20 minutes to move all the veg back to the window or suffer its wrath, a display that as far as I can recall has been that way for twenty odd years.


Still, making her shop shrink its obtrusive display area should give a struggling Sainsbury's a much needed opportunity to establish a better foothold in the local market.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/9507-trouble-at-vals/
Share on other sites

My memory of the boundaries for that parade is that the curtilage extends 12 feet from the shop frontages.


Val needs to check out where her boundary lies.


Unless the law has changed recently the council cannot stop her having a vegetable display within her boundary.


John K

Whatever the facts are, 20 minutes warning is hopeless. How can someone move a display like that so quickly? To do so in such a lightly staffed shop would take her away from dealing with customers and would potentially make the shop vulnerable to thiesves or shoplifters while the owner struggles with the external display.

This sounds like nonsense and a jumped up council official likely exceeding his power (possibly prompted by Sainsburys who have been disappointed at how many people are continuing to use the local shops) - it doesn't even sound like they provided any paperwork to back up their request. These sorts of things only usually happen when another trader complains.


Agree get James Barber on board.

Personally, I am not at all against Sainsbury's opening their store and I have started to use it simply because it does decent stuff and is local. I also still use Vals if all I want is some teabags or a pint of milk. I do not, however, approve of the COuncil getting arsey with any shopholder in the way described.

I was in there last night - the guy working there wasn't too clear about it but apparantly they have to apply for a suitable license to use the outside space. Something linked to new council rules. He didn't seem too bothered about it, almost as if it was a temporary problem.


Would like to hear what Nisha has to say about it. She may have more precise information.


*Edited for clarity and crap iPhone typing.*

eater81 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sounds like somebody at Sainsbury's is trying to

> turn the screw, probably some repulsive store

> manager who's getting told off by his bosses for

> the shop doing so poorly.

>

> SAINSBURY'S OUT!


Boycott Sainsbury's - placards,picket lines etc - it's the only way to get back at 'em!!!

You can't go accusing Sainsburys or anyone at Sainsbury's of this with no evidence whatsoever! What is this a vigilante thread!


I agree the council are being ridiculous but this obviously needs sorting through the proper channels, passing blame unnecessarily and without cause really doesn't help.


I for one are pleased Sainsburys have opened up this end, saves a nuisance treck to DKH to buy all the things (of which there are many) that the shops this end do not provide!

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> is this now about sainsburys then?


Well to quote Stevo above :-

"Nisha tells me that the council arrived last night and gave her 20 minutes to move all the veg back to the window or suffer its wrath, a display that as far as I can recall has been that way for twenty odd years"


Sainsburys arrive and in less than a month the small shops are getting hassled - perhaps just a strange coincidence.

Firms like Sainsburys have a huge influence on local councils and that's a fact. (Try reading "Shopped" by Joanna Blythman if you don't understand the facts).

I think it is a bit naive to think that this is just a coincidence. Of course it may be! But a similar thing happened to Dulwich Kebab further down LL - just after Bombay Bicycle Club opened next door the council raised issues over the terms of Dulwich Kebabs' licence to trade after 11pm (BBC being open to at least midnight I think) and they were forced to re-apply for their late-opening hours licence (or whatever its technical term is!).


The council doesn't trawl the streets of East Dulwich looking for shopfront displays in breach of regulations etc - it will have been prompted to look into this by a third party. I can't think of who that could have been....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That is sad. I didn't go much but it was interesting. The pizzas were really nice. Hopefully it's not just a chicken shop for the after school market. 
    • There's an 8 storey building about 200 yards NW of the site in question! It's so unremarkable that apparently many of the objectors don't even know it exists.   1) you're objecting to the economic analysis on the basis of "having a student"? That's hardly an evidence-based position. 2) 50-100 vehicles per day for move-in and move-out weekends, not every weekend, then?  3) It is a bit disappointing that you are disregarding the fairly obvious substantive difference between students enrolled in universities and pupils enrolled in local schools. Adults travel from all over England, the UK and the world to study at university in London. Parents of pupils at state schools try to send them to study as close to home as possible. Equally, you are ignoring that the student accommodation sector doesn't have enough capacity to house all students anyway. That is why many students live in share houses, whic increases competition with "regular" non-students who also want to rent those houses. Further, it's disappointing that you have decided students' accommodation needs are somehow not a valid consideration for you. They are also members of society - although perhaps they don't vote as much in local elections as houseowners do. Finally, you are again contradicting your own position that more student accommodation is unnecessary when you point out how expensive it is! That indicates an undersupply, and is a good reason to allow private companies to build more - it depresses the market price and makes it incrementally more accessible to lower income students.   Does it not strike you as odd that are simultaneously suggesting that only rich foreign students will live in the student accommodation BUT also that there aren't enough local students to fill it up and students don't have any money to spend in the local economy anyway?
    • You can also use the CDs on a string as bird scarers on a vegetable patch or allotment! Loads of other ideas online, eg: https://www.momsandcrafters.com/things-to-do-with-cds/ It seems a waste (literally)  for them just to go into landfill. If I didn't already have a house full of things to do, I would take them off your hands! Maybe kids at  a nursery or primary school might be able to do something with them?
    • I'm in East Dulwich and heard them in the distance and also wondered what they were celebrating. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...