Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Whilst I'm quite capable of dealing with this myself I'd appreciate some help here. For some reason, in the past few years I keep getting asked to be godfather to peoples kids. I'm not sure why.... I don't know that many people, am not especially religious nor do I possess any special qualities. I appreciate it is probably flattering to be asked but I'm also baffled to be honest. Why me?


On my first acceptance I read something at church and I gave a suitable present but to my shame I've been a rubbish godfather since, forgetting birthdays, Christmases etc mainly due to having too much committed elsewhere in life. I figure when she gets into probs later as a young adult I'd be able to help better. I'm not even sure what the modern role of a godfather should be these days - should it not be more about moral guidance than presents?


Anyways.... I think I'm about to be asked to be Godfather again and given the above is there a correct way to politely decline without causing too much offence?


All answers gratefully received!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/9636-the-godfather-again/
Share on other sites

yeah its a tough one mr ben and I sypathise with your dilemma.....not sure what the best way to politely decline is...perhaps you could elaborate on the huge amount of commitments and very little spare time you have these days and put them off asking you.


i think the modern role of godfather/mother seems to be buying them really extra-special pressies on significant birthdays...and being there for them if you had to. best of luck!

Men are crap at godfathering, as we never remember birthdays, nor the godchilds name age and address.


I am just not equipped to undertake the responsibility, as I am a lazy selfish bum, and I also feel it is a particularly useless and pointless role!


Other than that of course I wouldn't hesitate.

Clue's in the title: your job is to pray for little Johnny/Miranda and keep an eye on their spiritual development - same as it's always been.


You could easily decline on the grounds that you have no strong religious feelings. 'Renouncing the Devil, et' is pretty strong stuff, so if you don't believe it, don't do it.


I suspect that apart from being a jolly nice chap, you are stinking rich hence all the requests.

on a recent trip home, various discussions broke out about who my godparents were. All of the likely suspects were involved but no-one could be sure so we just shrugged and moved on


Moral is: godparents = nothing to sweat about


But the fact that you have several godchildren already should be reason enough and if the person asking you this time isn't aware enough to take that on board, what kind of friend are they?

"Of course, you realise when she's 18 I'm likely to still be single, and only in my mid-forties." (twiddle moustache)


"I'd love to. It would be great to have someone to take along to the local mum'n'toddler groups; there's some fierce MILF talent just waiting to be tapped up there."


"Godfather yeah? Cool. Rock up about church o'clock yeah? Say the vows? Hit the champers. Job's a good 'un. I can make a speech if you like. My improv at Jez's 30th went down a storm, right."

Maybe we do things a little different where I?m from but normally a godparent should be a sibling or cousin of one of the parents or a very close family friend.


The most important thing is that it is someone who will take a moral responsibility for the child should anything happen to the parents.


Other than that all it really just entails if a banknote in a birthday card once a year and attendance at certain events like 21st birthdays, weddings, confirmations, bar mitzvahs, trials etc.

I'm a godfather to my eldest nephew and to my eternal shame I've done absolutely nothing 'special' for him that is different to how I've treated my other nephews and nieces. Mainly because, like the OP, I've never really known how to do the 'godfather' role. He's 25 now so its all a bit late to do anything, anyway!

No I?m not confusing them. A designated legal guardian is someone who takes over care for a child if something happens to the parents.


This is different to a godparent whose role is of moral support. (at least in my understanding)


Although there is nothing to say that a godparent can?t also be a guardian.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In Catholicism the godparent must be Catholic,

> which kind of suggests that the chief role is

> religious indoctrination.


Balls. I'm catholic and neither of my godparents are. They were there all present and correct at my christening next to the priest in St Patrick?s. I?ve seen the pictures.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In Catholicism the godparent must be Catholic,

> which kind of suggests that the chief role is

> religious indoctrination.


no its not, my eldest girls godfather is c of e, father john didn,t bat an eye.

Nope the Huguenots have it. In a catholic baptism one of the godparents must be a practicising catholic over sixteen who has taken the Eucharist.


I have the whole joy of 'the christening' conversation to come soon with the devout irish catholic ma in law.

'what do you mean you're not, he'll go to limbo* or whatever).'

'hmm, that kind of attitude was kind of a clincher for me you see'


current catholic doctrine says that he might go to

heaven, I like the ambiguity there, just to say, see we're not bad everything really is nice and fluffy really...probably, but you might burn in hell if you don't you sinners!!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...