Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Being an 'Ecovandal' may not be rude but it certainly is disgusting. To think that its going on in my very own street. You just wouldn't expect it around here, this is a nice neighbourhood! And this as well as their activity inside the car... it really is too much to swallow. ;-)

Brum I'm shocked at you - dogging in ED indeedy.


My eye strayed to the top shelf in the newsagent this morning and I saw THREE - not ONE but THREE - porno magazines for those with a taste for naked tattooed ladies. Had there just been the one I would have shrugged it off - but THREE. I ask you. Where have I been? I must be leading a sheltered life.

Brum, the answer is obvious.


In these times of global warming, exotic beasties are invading our shores. Tiger Clams are crawling up our sewerage pipes, panthers follow Keef around the streets of Sydenham.


Clearly, a poisonous serpent has slipped into the car unseen and had then lurked in the footwell of the drivers seat waiting for a dastardly opportunity. The driver, in his innocence, had leapt into his Motor, started his engine, changed gear, enraged the snake and was then bitten on the todger for his pains.


The young lady then had no choice but to suck out the poison. Not wishing to ingest the poison, she would have then, well, erm ...


BRUM - DID YOU SEE HER SPIT??

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is there an amnesty on public blowjobs this week,

> or something?

>

> Where's the local "report them to the police"

> crowd when you need them?


Shouldn't a car be considered private property (so long as it's parked legally) and thus any actions that take place therein be no one else's business Hal? Really, shouldn't you be calling for a clampdown on local snoopers. Unless you're a little bit jealous of course.

Declan Wrote: Shouldn't a car be considered private property (so long as it's parked legally) and thus any actions that take place therein be no one else's business Hal?



It depends on how good a condition the vehicle in questions suspension is in. Or if the handbrake is engaged.

I've no problem with adventurous couples - or contractors and clients - putting a stationary vehicle through it's paces. Although admittedly, I thought that's what happend during an M.O.T. I just think it would be more considerate if they kept it to the Rugby club carpark.

Amazing that a lady of East Dulwich would participate in such a practice, if perchance it was not a life saving procedure. Must have been from Peckham.


HAL, I suspect that it is no lack of prudishness, its just most of them dont understand to what we are alluding, much like Queen Victoria.

Michael Palaeologus Wrote: Amazing that a lady of East Dulwich would participate in such a practice, if perchance it was not a life saving procedure.



Indeed Michael. And I'm sure the lady in question looked down her nose at the oikish intrusion with most disdain. With a little flaring of the nostrils as well which is so en-vogue amongst the MTV collective.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...