Jump to content

Recommended Posts

JBARBER wrote:- Do you mean the old timber yard?

If so the site was due to be cleared last week and building works on family homes started.



No mister Barber that site is on the corner of Underhill rd.

It has been mentioned that it was passed for five houses, but someone on this forum thought it had 'got the nod' for a centre for immigrants.

Does anyone know for sure what this site will be used for?

Well I hope it'll look good, that's all I can say. It just seems so sad to think of beautiful original victorian buidlings being wiped out. I live just off Upland Rd, close to where this is happening, but rarely visit Barry Rd unless I'm catching a bus, there I can see the work taking place. I don't know what it's looking like now...
I think its 8 2 bed flats at the front and 4 "mews" houses at the back all with parking spaces on site. planning permission was granted way back, and they waited ages before starting work. It is a great shame to see the old house demolished.
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
all I know is the houses in the development at the back have unbelievably steep roofs - well above what they asthetically should be - didn't get the planning permission that they thought they could push thro for loft rooms I believe (could be wrong so apologies if so) I really wonder if planners can actually read drawings sometimes - there are so many cases of bizarre permissions and equally bizarre refusals.
I have to say that I am surprised at how good the new builds actually look, I expected the usual modern towerblock style complex but they are actually quite tasteful and the windows looks really tasteful copies of original timber sash unlike the normal tacky PVC ones.
we were always told as a family by 95 year old grandmother that during the war an entire family were wiped out when a bomb was dropped on the site of the timber yard. and the site should never be built on?? bit of history there!! can anyone elaborate|???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Dulwich College had the "luck" of those allegations landing right in the middle of COVID when the media and everyone else was a bit distracted. And then to make double sure the discontent was suppressed, it threatened kids who wanted to demonstrate with police action. The kids at the time said: "Dulwich College has for years totally ignored, dismissed and condoned by turning a blind eye, this predatory behaviour by students... A protest was students’ only way to pressure the headmaster to actually tackle the sexual violence at his school.” The march by pupils of several schools was advertised on social media as “a demonstration against the predatory culture of Dulwich College and the school management [which] condones it". https://www.theguardian.com/education/2021/mar/26/dulwich-college-head-warns-pupils-over-culture-protest
    • @Cyclemonkey@Penguin68 Yes I heard that... I thought it was thunder at first and it did indeed sound like shelling
    • So if we were to give the council the benefit of the doubt there is a chance this might be net beneficial to Peckham rye? There’s a slim chance someone somewhere has crunched the numbers and not done this purely to annoy us? 
    • In the past such details have always been described as commercially sensitive, which they possibly are. So we've never really known what the deals actually were. And whether they represented value for money for the council, and hence us. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...