Jump to content

New Flats At ED Station - Be Warned! (it has a "veneer")


Zak

Recommended Posts

In case anyone is thinking of snapping up one of the new flats going up next to ED station, take a look at the attached picture.


From the outside it looks like they are properly built with bricks - as you might expect. But in fact the visible brickwork is simply a "brick skin", somehow attached to the exterior cladding which encases the building.


What you see here is the damage caused by a lorry which brushed the side of the building.


They look quite smart, but don't be fooled!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's standard construction. A modern building built with concrete and steel will be far sturdier than a period property built with shallow foundations and bricks. The brick cladding is just for aesthetic reasons. The depth of the brick tiles allows for far more insulation. It is a fantastic idea in my view. Modern construction techniques whilst retaining some character. You will find far more problems with Victorian properties built on clay around here
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The system is constructed with 20-30mm thick slips of actual clay bricks on a backing board, the gaps are pointed with mortar.


Brick slips are used in modern construction because in most framed buildings traditional construction is not suitable: window openings are too large, balconies and piers make the detailing extensive and often require additional secondary steelwork to support the brickwork. This increases the amount of brick material along with the secondary steelwork which increase the building weight: subsequently foundations also need to be sized accordingly. Using full clay bricks purely as a cladding system therefore comes with a hugely unnecessary carbon footprint.


Steel and concrete framed buildings are much more robust than in traditional construction as they have effective ties in all directions, many Victorian buildings lack these.


The title of the post is a bit like saying "Be Warned, this mobile phone doesn't have a cord and it's not plugged into the wall!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much of the 'Portland Stone' you will see in Belgravia is a veneer. It is the underlying strength of build and e.g. the insulation etc. used which is most important. Modern true 'brick built' houses have an inner wall of breeze blocks. Brick - as facings - has mainly been decorative since the 1960s or so. You have to go back to pre-war (perhaps just pre 1960) to find fully brick built houses as the most normal type, with brick commons used in the inner wall and facings on the outer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tower Bridge as well... thats a stone facade.



Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Much of the 'Portland Stone' you will see in

> Belgravia is a veneer. It is the underlying

> strength of build and e.g. the insulation etc.

> used which is most important. Modern true 'brick

> built' houses have an inner wall of breeze blocks.

> Brick - as facings - has mainly been decorative

> since the 1960s or so. You have to go back to

> pre-war (perhaps just pre 1960) to find fully

> brick built houses as the most normal type, with

> brick commons used in the inner wall and facings

> on the outer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it was a bit of a bodge when i saw them putting the tiles on. You can try to dress it up as acceptable but its blatantly not going to last as long as real brick. As already shown.

A lot of modern new builds are built with a very short term view of looking good long enough to sell. Peckham Rye is about to get hundreds of new build 2 bed flats. I hope they have planed a bit further ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Houseoflego Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought it was a bit of a bodge when i saw them

> putting the tiles on. You can try to dress it up

> as acceptable but its blatantly not going to last

> as long as real brick. As already shown.

> A lot of modern new builds are built with a very

> short term view of looking good long enough to

> sell. Peckham Rye is about to get hundreds of new

> build 2 bed flats. I hope they have planed a bit

> further ahead.


Solmons Passage was a classic example of this.


How many flats being demolished and peoples lives shattered

Link to comment
Share on other sites

eastdulwichproperty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's standard construction. A modern building

> built with concrete and steel will be far sturdier

> than a period property built with shallow

> foundations and bricks. The brick cladding is just

> for aesthetic reasons. The depth of the brick

> tiles allows for far more insulation. It is a

> fantastic idea in my view. Modern construction

> techniques whilst retaining some character. You

> will find far more problems with Victorian

> properties built on clay around here


I?d take a Victorian house that?s been standing for 110+ years than a quickly constructed block of flats that is built to line the pockets of the developers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i just feel it's sad that they haven't appeared to have taken any care or consideration to marry up with the brickwork of the station itself, so it is a nice continuity..i'm wondering how they will finish the side elevation of the station, that appears to be left unfinished from the demolition? Shame
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flux capacitor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I noticed that fa?ade long before the damage that

> now afflicts the building. I wasn't impressed to

> be honest if just seems like their cutting Corners

> to make a quick profit which should no longer be

> tolerated. We could report the company to

>

> Trading Standards

>

>

> https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/consumer/get-mor

> e-help/report-to-trading-standards/


On what grounds exactly will you be reporting them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks fine. Obviously it is damaged because it was hit by a lorry. Want to see pictures of brick houses when hit by lorries? They can look pretty bad too.


While my 140 year old Victorian house is still standing, it is only doing so thanks to being a mid terrace held by other houses, some of which has been underpinned. Insulation is horrible and I can hear my neighbours sneeze, and smell whenever they smoke weed or whatever. My next house will definitely be a new build.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't believe they tore down the old station building, that was once a pleasant garden center,what a crime and should not have been allowed to happen, councilors have crimes to pay for (again) and replaced with a average quality boring building of over priced stuffy cramped flats looking onto a road full of bus's and ambulance's, East dulwich station looks pathetic now, wedged up between the bridge and the horrible block, gentrification is great hey?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Because she wasn't meant to be on the ballot. Daniel Korski was their first choice but he was added to the list of Conservative politicians accused of sexual abuse and had to step down.    Interestingly that list is longer than the list of people ever convicted of voter fraud.   
    • Hi All, Just want to let know everyone that to due job cancellation I will take some more work booking for next month in June. Please contact me for more info on email: [email protected]  or on Mob 07961 403256.    Many thanks  Peter
    • Whilst I am finding this thread amusing as it is parodying the who are one dulwich discussion, at the end of the day both the pro LTN and Anti LTN groups are using social media to portray their points and arguments and it doesn't matter who is behind them as they both use simular tactics. 
    • PM has reduced from road traffic primarily due to effective emission standards, started off following the bad Los Angeles smogs of the 60s and 70s that led to petrol vehicles moving from carburetors to fuel injection, and the three way catalyst. As diesel cars became more popular, leading to more soot, as well as that already emitted from heavy vehicles new vehicle emission standards effectively brought down particulate emissions.  You always have to look at street level emissions rather than total emissions, as these have the greatest impact on human health. Car exhausts are closer to people's lungs than industrial stacks.  London all but met legal standards by the tens and Johnson, funded by DfT had a push to meet these on all roads.  Whether legal limits could be tighter is a question, as there is no such thing as a safe level.   Renewal of bus fleets and retrofitting older vehicles was important.  London as far as I am aware has the most modern/cleanest of all in the country, Livingstone wrongly supported the bendy bus, not a bad vehicle but made for wide straight boulevards.  Johnson and the new routemaster was just stupid, it vibrates, rarely running in electric mode, wasted space with the extra door and stairs, and I've seen some spewing out soot, so obviously the filter has failed.  There was a loophole that encouraged some drivers to get rid of their diesel filters after they became blocked rather than cleaning them out, but the MOT was toughened.   You still see the odd vehicle spewing out smoke, police do have powers to stop and get the owner to test, but this is not a priority.  There is a smoky vehicle government hotline but not sure if this is effective.  https://www.gov.uk/report-smoky-vehicle I've worked in and around this area for years so have some broad knowledge. I'm more active in promoting active travel nowadays.  I'd push government on driving standards which should be a quick win on safety, carbon, air quality and congestion but they are not bothered as this would mean accepting that most of us are not good drivers (subjective term but if you had a random driving retest programme most would fail). I think too much is made of ClearAirDulwich, I doubt whether they are a major lobby group but provide some good stories for people like me.  I've called Alleynes a couple of times and got them to instruct drivers to turn their engines off, it's pretty good in recent months.  There is a downside to every intervention (well apart from flouride in water but that is another story). We moved to unleaded, and some were disadvantaged, even though there were phenomenal public health benefits.  E10, reducing carbon emissions but a small number of older cars have problems.  Close a road, make it one way or introduce parking fees, as we have done for decades across London, will always upset some people. Paris in desperation during 40 degree summer temperatures with no wind introduced alternate days for vehicle access, odd and even number plates.  When this was done in Lagos the wealthy owners simply had two vehicles one with odd, one with even.  So whatever you do this will in all likelihood have a lower impact on the rich.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...