General ED Issues / Gossip
Discuss life in London's East Dulwich
17,286 topics in this forum
-
- 11 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 25 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 565 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1k views
-
- 34 replies
- 3.9k views
-
- 1 reply
- 718 views
-
- 2 replies
- 575 views
-
- 4 replies
- 983 views
-
- 8 replies
- 827 views
-
- 0 replies
- 197 views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 69 replies
- 5.5k views
-
- 80 replies
- 6.5k views
-
- 8 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 6 replies
- 2k views
-
- 21 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 53 replies
- 3.6k views
-
- 97 replies
- 10.1k views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 85 replies
- 11.4k views
-
- 25 replies
- 4k views
-
- 45 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 31 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 13 replies
- 931 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
Thanks I've removed it from my original message, please can you delete yours too? As its quoting my old post that has the number in it! -
By first mate · Posted
The issue for me is about reducing damage to animals, whether wild or domestic, as well as to those humans that also suffer as a result. The sad thing is that there is a compromise available in the form of low noise fireworks- it is the apparent addiction to imposing loud bangs and other scary sounds that I find so strange. -
I'd love it if ED was a little bit more Denmark Hill! -
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd7rg7wjvgvo I also consider what she said was racist, but worse, unnecessary designed to stir up conflict. The advertisers are free to use whoever they want to sell their product. I'm quite happy for them to depict multiracial Britain, or gay/trans friendly (as per London Underground), disability aware etc etc. From time to time I'll see a more traditional product where everyone in the ad is white. So??
-