Isn't science about discovery and disproving theories? In which case, scientists are trying to disprove things that were previously thought of as certainties... Rather than just assuming it's all mumbo jumbo (love that phrase), why don't they investigate it more closely, and see if there is something in it. I once went to a church service where they were "touched" by the "winds of Totonto" (or something like that). They believed that the Holy Spirit had touched them, and people would stand either side of another person and trey for them, resulting in the person falling to the ground, laughing or crying hysterically.... All rather odd, but quite an experience (NOTE, I ONLY WENT AS AN INTERESTED OBSEVER AND WENT OUT FOR A FAG WHEN THEY STARTED OFFERING TO PREY FOR ME). Anyway, I remember a girl standing up and telling her story; she had suffered from severe severe asthma, and couldn't walk 10 yards without struggling for breath. However, after she'd been "touched", she was cured, her inhalers were thrown away and she'd run a marathon. Now I'm not saying I believe she was touched by the Holy Spirit (I'm not saying she wasn't either), but the fact is, her asthma had gone... How??? Maybe some things just can't be explained, but I'm pretty sure Dawkin would struggle to explain it too... :-S