Ironically then, despite the proliferation of digital cameras, it would seem then that this era wont be much documented photographically. The likes of Martin Parr would simply be hounded out of doing what he does best, documentary photography of the way we are/were. For instance look at this, actual skin on show, quick arrest him. (click through to the 'genius of photography' article; note the use of the word photography rather than paedophilia) As a hobbyist photographer myself I understand that other people's sensibilities need to be taken into account, I'll hand out a moo card with my details once I've taken a shot, I'd wouldn't take a photo of a child surreptitously but I think there is a place for photos street photography that may contain children, and if someone takes umbrage (by the way noone ever actually has) I'll delete the photo. I do find the tenor of the less reasonable posts on this thread is utterly depressing, sorry, unnacceptable ;)