Sue

Lowlander Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Jacqui5254 Wrote: > ------------------------------ > > > > *'Lordship Lane'...not sure which bit as they > try > > not to show you more than your registration > plate. > > By the junction with the south circular. The > photos on my account show me next to a car with > the driver on his mobile!! > Which side? The East Dulwich side as you wait to turn right on the south circular towards Dulwich Park? Would it pick you up if you were coming from the Forest Hill direction and turning left? Asking for a friend 🤣

NewWave Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm pretty sure the fabulous Herbal remedy shop on > Lordship lane next to Save the Children Charity > shop sell them. > and they probably have the resin version to be > used with charcoal burners like in Church too. > Also Elemental more or less opposite may have them Lordship Lane? Do you mean Baldwins on Walworth Road?

Try Celestial?

Rockets Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Honestly, this council is beyond reproach. Yet > still, people will come on here and defend them > and claim this is a genuine oversight. > I don't think you mean "beyond reproach"?

Annie5 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Just seen two > parakeets attacking a blackbird outside ....... > they are definitely pests. So are cats, by that definition!

I got mine this morning ....

Why did it take so long?

tfwsoll Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I've seen a flock of parakeets attacking a > comorant in flight above Brockwell Park and Sunray > Gardens. I think they are just aggressive pests. > > It's nature .....

Marjoram Wrote: --------------------------------------------------- > things at the sorting office are clearly very bad > right now. It seems to me that things at the sorting office have been clearly very bad since the Sylvester Road delivery office was closed and our deliveries now come from Peckham. Royal Mail should be unprivatised, if that's a word. All it cares for now is profit for its shareholders. Any care for a reasonable, let alone good, level of service went out of the window ages ago. Covid is just a convenient excuse. Meanwhile our old sorting office was sold for flats. So-called 24 and 48 hour tracking is an absolute joke. And the posties' workload is increased because they now have not just the original package to deliver (eventually) but its replacement as well when the first one doesn't arrive. And then the counter staff at the Post Office have extra work to do when one of those two items, whichever finally arrives last, has to be returned. It's an absolute shambles.

So what is the point?!

Wordsworth

I've just posted on this in the Covid section. Unless you do the test in front of the person checking and hold up the whole queue while the result develops, you can just show someone else's test or photo of the test, or just lie? Surely? And you could upload someone else's result and say it was yours? Have I missed something obvious here? That's why at our gigs we ask for proof of double jab or proof of exemption only, and check against names. Even that probably isn't foolproof if someone was sufficiently determined.

Can anyone explain to me how showing evidence of a negative lateral flow test works? Surely unless you actually do it in front of the person checking you in (clearly not feasible if there are long queues), you could just use someone else's result? Or just lie?

You might want to post this in the lost and found section as well? And say what the girl's name is, in case somebody on here recognises it?

BrandNewGuy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ... especially if the something or other is > 'artisanal'. Indeed

Chick Wrote: ----------------------------------------------------- > > If you had been electrocuted you would be dead. > You can get an electric shock from the mains without being killed.

You don't get black charring on your feet with an electrostatic shock, do you? OP is the shop owned or leased? If leased, surely the landlord is responsible. Have you tried asking the Citizens' Advice Bureau if the council environmental health department is not being helpful?

Purveyor. Especially if followed by "of fine..." something or other. Grrrr.

❤️

Dan-the-man Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi Scarlett, > > Definitely you can join and I'd encourage you to > do so. Not sure exactly what the process would be > for selecting the new candidate and when it would > take place, but you'd have a vote at your local > branch level at least in terms of who your branch > would nominate (I think that's how it works but > can't be 100% sure). They changed the rules after a load of people (including me) joined the Labour Party to vote for Jeremy Corbyn as leader. Don't know if it's different for MPs.

Absolutely crap service lately. Packages taking weeks to arrive.

FJDGoose Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "Hit the ground running" ......... please shutup! Bees! Bonnets! 😂

FJDGoose Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KidKruger Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > ?Turned around and said?? > > > that is particularly annoying. I have never heard that, what context is it used in?

FJDGoose Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Must of, would of instead of Must Have, Would > have....... drives me round the twist. Also "bored of" (instead of "bored with") which seems to have taken over completely now.

How about this bargain, if that one doesn't appeal .... https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/313754567488 Cheap postage, too 🤣