Jump to content

Sue

Member
  • Posts

    21,449
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sue

  1. The Actress usually has the very tasty Adnams Broadside. What more could you ask? ETA: And the EDT usually has Adnams Lighthouse at ?2.80 a pint which must be the cheapest pint in East Dulwich. Not half as nice as Broadside though ......
  2. UncleBen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Somewhere in the fog of my memory japanese > knotweed has to be reported to the environment > agency or some other body? Cut the stem at ground > level, fill the stump tube with weedkiller, and > burn the removed stem. xxxxxx Sorry, but that won't work ..... If Japanese Knotweed could be killed so easily with weedkiller,there'd be no problem ......
  3. Good luck for tomorrow, Spark67 :))
  4. It's the new Clowns .....
  5. *Bob* Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- Timotei xxxxx :)) :)) :))
  6. MadameChocolat Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Had a yummy salt/Caramel ice cream from hope and > greenwood the other day, only ?2. How much in new > icecream place ? And are they as scrumy? xxxxxxxx Oh brilliant, have Hope and Greenwood got their salted caramel back in? I don't think Oddono's version is so good, but my memory of Hope and Greenwood's may be wrong. This is such a great excuse to have two cones on one day, so that I can make a direct comparison :))
  7. Saw the ones outside the Blue Mountain Cafe last night. I think they're great :)
  8. UncleBen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > That's yet another parking space gone. xxxxxxx :))
  9. Maybe phone the council and ask them to put you through to the relevant department? Their phone reception people would surely know?
  10. According to this, trials are ongoing at the moment. One article about the basis for the claimed health benefits is here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/lifestyle/9480451/The-52-diet-can-it-help-you-lose-weight-and-live-longer.html
  11. I know absolutely nothing about the legal situation, but do you for example have emails from him (or anything else in writing or that is demonstrably written or sent by him) stating what he intended to do re changing his will? So sorry you are having to deal with this on top of grieving for him.
  12. Callie Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > we tried Hope & Greenwood & thought it the worst > ever. > xxxxxxxx Really? When did you try it? If recently, they must have changed their supplier, as last year it was absolutely excellent. I went in last week for their salted caramel icecream, and they didn't have any, which was very disappointing. I tried Oddono's, which was nice but didn't make me drool as much as Hope and Greenwood's had, so I wanted to see if my memory of Hope and Greenwood's was accurate!
  13. Along with many people I first heard about the 5:2 eating schedule from a Horizon programme. The programme focused on the health advantages rather than weight loss. I can't remember the details now but there were medical indicators which showed significant improvement after following the diet. I expect you can google it. I can't be bothered. Obviously that wasn't a controlled study using a lot of people, but it still suggests a benefit. Comparing it to homoeopathy is just absurd. If you think it's a load of bull then don't go on it, but why diss the people who are finding it helpful?
  14. suzisoo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ha ,I started this diet after Christmas, the > weight was dropping off and I was going around > telling everyone how great it was. After a while I > stopped as I felt I had lost enough but the weight > continued to drop and I began to be very ill. It > turns out I have an overactive thyroid. So now I > can eat anything I like and still stay thin. > However I think I would rather be a bit overweight > than suffer the exhaustion this has brought. xxxxxxx :(
  15. Really good news! Come on you pink and blues! :))
  16. lousmith Wrote: ------------------------------------ > are there plants? I'm sure it'll be fine now the > body has gone. xxxxx Yes but some got scooped up with the body:( Will get some more.
  17. Sandals and black socks with denim shorts? That's what's really bringing the area down! Crap clothes!
  18. OOOOPS I grovel, my html was rubbish :))
  19. It was dead and beginning to decompose :( OH has removed it. Poor frog. Now need to try to increase the oxygen level in the water I think.
  20. Can you PM me what I did, so I don't do it again, as I still don't know what it was? Ta.
  21. El Pibe Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > of course it's not forbidden, it's just that you > did > > &lti&gtwords here > > and then copy and pasted it umpteen times, meaning > some well meaning moderator type had to do lots of > search and replacing for you. > Just try and do it properly next time ;-P xxxxxx Don't understand, duh. So far as I recall I didn't copy and paste anything, and even if I had the html would have been the same as if I'd typed it in separately, surely? I can't show you what I used because it doesn't come out properly on its own, but it had this effect: words here What I used was only what is showing up on your post, not the symbols that are showing up in your post when I edit. And I checked it in the preview before I posted it, and it all looked fine :( Can't look now obviously, because it's all gone. Sorry to have put someone to so much trouble, but I've used every symbol I used before on here with no problem :(
  22. Well due to reflections on the water I couldn't even see it when I came to do it! Had a feel around but couldn't find it, but if it was dead I might have moved it anyway without realising :( Will try to persuade my OH to do it tomorrow. I wore rubber gloves (not the powdered sort) but still feel a bit squeamish. Happy to hold live frogs, not possibly dead ones.
  23. My insurance is just up for renewal. I had been under the impression that I had had subsidence in the past but my current insurer has looked into my previous claims and has just told me that the two claims were treated as "ground movement" which is not as serious as subsidence. She says there are four categories of movement: Subsidence/heave/landslip/ground movement. What I have always thought was subsidence was in one case due to differential movement between my front bay and the rest of the house and in the other due to a problem with drains, which was completly sorted at the time. I want to get other quotes but I'm now very confused. Obviously I have to declare the claims, but are they or are they not for subsidence? My current insurer says some underwriters will treat them as subsidence and some won't ?????? Can anybody shed any light?
  24. lousmith Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Likewise the frog. It may be that it sees you > coming and dives to the bottom. Check it to see if > its alive and definitely hook it out if it is not. xxxxxx Thanks Lousmith. Oh dear, I think I'd better go and do it now then. Not looking forward to it :(
  25. Sue

    craft beer

    Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Blue Moon - to be honest I find it drinkable > enough, but it's basically a poor imitation of a > belgian wheat bear, so just seems a little > pointless. xxxxxx I don't like Blue Moon at all, and yet there must be sufficient people who drink it for the EDT to continue to sell it. Yet they had a great dark lager which was really yummy, which they no longer have because apparently I was the only person who drunk it (and only once a week, so it must have taken a long time to finish their stock!)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...