DJKillaQueen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > That is interesting reading and shows just why I > and you and others strongly argued the importance > of licensing requirements being followed in that > previous thread about DH and noise, some time > back. At the time of that thread, Nick the licence > holder didn't even know what the details of his > licence were, arguing he had different licensing > hours for the bar on another thread (and > deliberately misleading an event promoter who uses > the venue in the process) to those that he > actually did. Soon after he applied for a > variation to extend the bar licence! Doesn't say > very much for the competance of the licence > holder. xxxxxxx Yet again, DJKQ, please get your facts right. If you are referring to me, Nick did not "deliberately mislead" me. He made a genuine mistake about what was covered by the wording when the licence application was made, and genuinely thought that he had applied for, and got, a late licence. As soon as it was brought to his attention that in fact he had not, he immediately took steps to rectify things. ETA: I think you owe him an apology in view of the tone and content of your post.