Which is precisely why we shouldn?t have had a referendum in the first place. If we had referenda on everything we would have capital punishment and many other ills. would have JoeLeg Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Look, people can march as much as they like, but > realistically we all know it?s not going to be put > to a public vote again. > > I think marches etc are fine for purposes of > keeping public pressure on government, but I hope > no one is kidding themselves that it will actually > to any kind of referendum, plebiscite or vote. Nor > should it, to my mind (and everyone is free to > tell me I?m wrong). We elect officials to lead the > country, and this is part of it. The final deal > will be so complex that there?s no way the whole > of the voting public can be expected to comprehend > it in enough detail to render a considered vote. > That?s not to call people stupid, just that this > is a sodding complex issue way beyond the realms > of Twitter. > > I?m still really angry that the govt has been so > idiotic thus far, and part of me hopes the whole > thing is a clever Trump-esque ?method in our > madness? scheme, and not the amateur hour it > appears to be so far. > > We?re going to be arguing about it for a long time > regardless...