ImpetuousVrouw

I undesrtand Skidmarks sentiments re owner occupier pubs, but when I wanted to take my kids out for a meal, the only option for me as a single parent with 4 kids and a granddaughter was Wetherspoons in Peckham. The snobby remarks about the type of clientelle who frequent Wetherspoons are disgusting and I hope those sitting so comfortably in their ivory towers lose all they own in the tsunami of a recession that is heading our way, then they might be glad they can crawl out of their pit for a drink in the new Wetherspoons every 2 weeks when their benefit comes through.

I would have thought that would be obvious to the OP but hey, can't let someone elses suffering get in the way of a chuckle, can we?

I like people who kiss my arse.

Ruler of the known universe.:)

Skids, I am just doing a favour for ED womankind by having a bit of a recce. I should add actually, ED ladies, that our Skids is pretty hot in the flesh too, and I think he's single still. See, I'm just the advance guard Skids, not a greedy cow after all!

Just met him ladies and he's lovely. Laid back sexy Yorkshire man.

Can I have a set too please?

I have dumped someone after about 2 months because he wasn't a fan of cunilingus.

Why must he be short?

Cycle

Crystal Palace road, bellendon, southampton way, over burgess park, through the aylsbury and heygate then joining the cycle sh at elephant. That's the best route.

Silverfox, cyclists are allowed to cycle the wrong way down one way streets: Cycle Contraflow

Saw Paul McGann on Crystal Palace Road. I wizzed past on my bike so didn't get time to ingratiate myself or anything. I've loved him since I saw him in Gaskin years ago.

karter Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ImpetuousVrouw Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > No MP - keep up! > > > > I stopped being single last month - but am not > > sure if I'm ready for a life of slippers and > cocoa > > just yet! > > > > Plus I was hoping to do my good deed for the > day > > for the handsome young ex-monk, Rubsley : ) > > Impetuous, you looked very much in your comfort > zone last night dear. That shouldn't put rubsley > off though. Dude she is top drawer. How sweet of you Karter! I'm feeling pretty content generally nowadays so have that smug glow you obviously find so attractive!! And back to Rubsley, you have made a good start by being quite hot looking, so now you just have to polish anysparkling wit you may have and perfect an air of confidence. Then you'll be fighting off the babes with a stick!

Eggsactly Daizie!

No MP - keep up! I stopped being single last month - but am not sure if I'm ready for a life of slippers and cocoa just yet! Plus I was hoping to do my good deed for the day for the handsome young ex-monk, Rubsley : )

Lol. I'm no longer single, but you can never have too many fine young things in your life!

Yep, sorry. You're going to miss your chance to have your first ever date at this rate! Unless you make a counter offer of course!

Well, with a name like that, what can you really expect woof?

Ok, I'll meet you in the Plough at 2pm this afternoon for a lunch date. How's that?

I am way too hungover to comment!

I don't get flashed at much nowadays either. I doubt it's cos I'm less hot, cos obviously I'm hat as hell, but I think I am more intimidating or look less easy to shock than I may have done when I was still sweet and innocent-ish! I think it's the shock factor that they go for or some kind of reaction other than 'Fuck off you wanker', which is what they'd get off me now. I have had a couple of gropers still though, but the last time was about a year ago and he was too quick for me to react.

No need for a babysitter as her Dad is having her this weekend, so might pop in for a couple myself.

Maybe not, but it still feels like a step in the wrong direction to me.

This method of fundraising leaves a very bad taste in my mouth. Apart from the dubious way Kings have tried to get round their DPA obligations by using the CEO instead of the charity to send the mailshot, I am concerned that the funding for Kings (and the NHS in general) may move towards a user pays method instead of the free at point of delivery method paid for out of general taxation. If the people who use the service are seen as fair game in a search for funding after they have received treatment, who is to say that a move towards a charge before treatment will not be something coming in the near future. While some of you on here may say, 'fair enough, the user should pay', not everyone who needs medical treatment has the means to pay for it, which is why we have the NHS in the first place. This mailshot seems like a faux pas in terms of Kings PR, but may be more serious for the future of a free NHS if accepted as normal practice.