Sue Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KalamityKel Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > It would be more appropriate to actually > > email/contact the licensing department act the > > council not to email/contact James. > > > > xxxxxxx > > But that is exactly what James has asked people to > do in his original post in this thread! > > He gave the email address of the licensing > department for people to do that. He just asked to > be copied in - obviously you don't have to copy > him in if you don't want to. > > ETA: So I really don't understand why you think he > has been in any way misleading. Sue if you're going to quote me please do so correctly. By James asking to be copied in would imply his involvement in the application or indeed there is some influence to be had with the decision making, which, James has indicated he has no part of so aside from sheer noseyness why should James be included? No doubt there are will be some that disagree agree with me *shrugs* and waffle on about all the good he's doing... blah blah blah. Yes making us aware is good but not to give a false impression.