KalamityKel

Buses ARE running just diverted. Still running down Lordship Lane so no need panic. Take a some extra time for your journey if your concerned.

northlondoner Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > sjf1 Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I don't have problem with my neighbours seeing > > into my house, I just feel uneasy about > strangers > > being able to take a seat at a table and > spending > > an afternoon looking in on my children. I don't > > think I would be alone in feeling like that. > > > Are your children golden unicorns , with hooves of > the finest ivory, perhaps ? Or gossamer winged > angels weaving rainbows as they flit around their > room sprinkling golden dust ? Is this why people > will want to spend an hour or two staring into > their room ? > How do you cope with taking them into the public ? > 😇 Is there any need for sarcasm? As a neighbour to the area sjf1 has a right to their own concerns whether you agree or not

I'm still confused... what are these people you are searching for expected to do?

doesn't mean to say it wont EVER happen though. Why should families be left feeling insecure? Why should residents have to resort to using curtains? Besides where else on the Lane is there similar use of the first floor? *shrugs*

I'm not against the business prospect but I'm not keen on the change of use part. Once it's changed... Nor the idea to have a kitchen upstairs to the rear - it's bad enough having the burnt oily fumes from the Curry Cabin taking over the area at all times of day/into late evening without adding to it. Neighbouring residents will not be pleased. AND using the rear space with more windows will certainly add strain to residents being overlooked - more so than when Soup Dragon held classes upstairs. Nor the use of the alley way for service - it's too narrow for vehicles, the house which sits on one side to it has windows that open outwards narrowing the space further...I also believe the house in question has their "official" street door on the side although the door on Chesterfield Grove is now used due to past issues. They would be within their rights to kick up a fuss. The Funeral directors stopped using the alleyway many years ago because of the narrowness and issues with the neighbouring house. It's all well and good to declare in an application they know the area well but it would be nice if this was actually demonstrated in the application!

You know the food always arrives cold and yet still order from them? Have you complained? Interesting rant... ;-)

Loath as I am to resurrect this thread... the applicants are appealing the decision http://planningonline.southwark.gov.uk/AcolNetCGI.exe?ACTION=UNWRAP&RIPNAME=Root.PgeDocs&TheSystemkey=9547620

http://planningonline.southwark.gov.uk/AcolNetCGI.exe?ACTION=UNWRAP&RIPNAME=Root.PgeResultDetail&TheSystemkey=9549506 Once again the council are keeping things hush hush - only a small number of residents have been issued with consultation notification and NOT all those this will effect.

*completely lost* Someone speak english!

pan

I'd just move :-D

heavy

They are?

Why drag up an old thread when, with all this new EE/4g mobile stuff, the old problem is not likely to be the case? As I recall the past issue was in a particular part of ED... it didn't effect me last time round but is now...

It's been a bit up and down the last couple of days...

What are your choices and what is taking your fancy?

sandyman Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Write to complain if you want but it won't achieve > much. I had a problem with a 176 a while back. A > full 176 heading to ED pulled up at Camberwell > Green and was clearly not going to let anybody on. > An empty one behind it sailed straight past the > stop. As it was stuck in traffic at the > Coldharbour Lane lights I caught up with it and > tapped on the door. The driver ignored me and as I > could not see any id number which they usually > have I walked round to his side and gestured that > I was going to take a picture of him. He had a > wooly hat on and pulled it down over his face. I > went and tapped on the front window to get his > attention and he suddenly swerved around me and > drove off. At least he'd pulled his woolly hat up > by then. > > Wrote to operating company, got fobbed off with > reply saying drivers are highly trained, shouldn't > have done this, will look into it, blah, never > heard back again. If the "leader" - the one that was probably empty and over took the one at the stop was running late (behind the one at the stop) it's common practise for a bus to miss a stop entirely annoying as it is. The fact that he then wouldnt let you on past the stop AND at a set of lights only shows common sense for the driver - what's the matter with you? Do you seriously think that was safe? For yourself, the bus/bus driver and other vehicles on the road? AND THEN you thought you had the right to complain? Seriously? !!! ETA: - it's illegal for a driver to let someone board the bus when not at a stop, except in an emergency.

Driving slow yet had to hang on for dear life on the stairs? Darn what were YOU doing up there!

Child: "ewww ewww ewww a dead frog! a dead frog! ewww thats disgusting!" Parent on close inspection of said dead frog: "no dear, it's a banana skin"

Old school?

Perhaps because it is not ED specific as you've mentioned Southwark as a whole.

ride

I'd move if I were you... tis the only solution ;-)

Waterproof plasters

CPRoadBigLunch Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > I am also puzzled. Can you please un-puzzle me. > > I thought I'd posted this in a section which said > 'Ask Admin'. I get a reply from you. Are you > Admin? If ya post in a public place...