KalamityKel

Oh stop it both of you! Acting like children and further demonstrating the point of this thread is only making you both look silly. There is no need to provoke or respond to each others comments in the way that you are.

When might we hear the results of the appeal from last Wednesday?

Nuts...

Anyone for cheese on toast?

Elastic bands

Romnarz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If the coop are daft enough to think that people > are stupid and want to shop 24/7 then let them. I > cant see there being a huge number of cars > fighting for a parking place at 2 am.Most big > supermarkets have stopped all hours opening > because there was NOT enough demand. When are people going to understand they hadn't applied for the amendment with the intention to actually use the hours given (if it was granted...) but for the option to do so if they wanted to?! It's not rocket science.

If you're open minded to travel you'd be better offer bus hopping to vauxhall (if that's the way you're going to go). Any bus to Camberwell then choice of 185, 36 and 436... I'm surprised it too you that long thought, was it the time it took from vauxhall to lambeth bridge?

Itatm just remember some councillors are known for saying things that are completely untrue then deny saying what they said... blah blah blah. Unless its all made official - actual facts - you really cant/shouldnt take much seriously. A thing that annoys me with all this drivel on statistics over quality of schools is surely ALL schools should be at a high level regardless if theyre new or old and how can anyone possibly predict the standard of a school that doesnt exist? Is this just a ploy,preying on parents that, yes want the best for their children, but are gullible to the unrealistic lines fed by councillors who will support council plans just because theyre led to believe what they hear/read? Would be nice,in and ideal world, there werent any hidden agendas whether based on politics or personal gain (we all want to be liked dont we?) Ugh!

the-e-dealer Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > sO IF YOU WANT TO READ SOMETHING YOU DONT HAVE TO > HUNT FOR YOUR GLASSES Tis okies no need for the large print im wearing my own (as opposed to anyone elses) glasses now ta. My point being ppl who walk around like i said look stoopid. Just get that string thingamy or wear them on ya head when not using them... u know it makes sense ;-) In other news... nearly empty yet not quite enuff of a squeeze toof paste tubes

Im aware of this but why wear them if you're not reading? I get easily scared ya know ;-)

people who look over their glasses when walking around/talking to people

An ad outside an offlicence... "We have beers as colds as... your ex's heart"

HonaloochieB Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KalamityKel Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > ouch! > > I see your Ouch! and I raise you an Argh! Stop it you, you'll make me blush!

rch Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > In the end, it was the police who put in a bid for > the funding for the railings - they are going to > be distributing a leaflet to the estate to explain > why. > Shouldn't this have been done before the installation? Especially if this is based on "security" as suggested by the intervention/recommendation of the police???

ouch!

Yawning

You can't make people read. It's all pretty straight forward really but people still get it wrong. Have you tried telling these people that keep invading your inbox? You could be saving everyone time and bother ya know

polla2256 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Why stop at the internet ? What about media > overload - Surely constant viewing of corry, > eastenders, X factor etc is as bad as twitter, > facebook, reddit, xbox.... It's just that we find > couchpotatoism more acceptable than gluing > yourself to your table, phone, PC, console... > The telly doesn't speak back to you... mostly!

Growlybear Wrote: > Whilst it's great to be able to top up your Oyster > card online, it's not much help if you don't use > trains or the underground and only use buses > because you have to activate the top up at a > machine before it's credited to your account. Whenever I've purchased new cards online (and I have a fair number of them for the family) I've never gone to a train/tube station to activate it... just board the bus and touch in.

114 days to go... ;-)

I assume you mean "The focus should be getting as many people SAFELY as possible on the buses" KK? We wouldn't want a repeat of those bendy bus thingamys now would we?! The empathsis is too much on speeding up the service to make it "quicker"? why? does 30 seconds (over generalising based on no statistical fact of course) saved each stop from potential cash fares really make much of a difference? What about the time taken when passengers ask for directions, take time when boarding either through disability, lots of shopping/luggage, pushchairs, wheelchair users with the ramp having to be used, over boarding of passengers? If anything these examples slow up the service yet are a necessary part of travel. To say banning cash fares would improve time by suggesting it's time consuming is unrealistic. To say also that it would be saving on admin is unrealistic. Surely more time and resources would be required to administer oyster card refunds and payment queries/issues.

The only change they carry is the change they provide themselves not what the bus company provides. Bus companies stopped issuing tills some time ago

Get them all the time... no mention of the house theyre offering for exchange, all seems a bit selfish to me *sigh* ;-)

Saturday mornings :-|

No