KalamityKel

woodrot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > the amount of energy needed to start up a > computer, log in and begin typing up another complaint about lost > cat posts may be the most important thing you will > ever do - but have you ever thought about the > energy wasted in doing this ? > > Why bother starting a new complaining about a thread every time mr > socks doesnt appear for a few days. Why not just > use the one you started last time and just bump it > up and update the details where needed. > > hey presto.Energy saving tips from the cat loving yet slightly mentally disturbed woodrot Well put! ;-)

maxxi Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Annette Curtain Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Is Robort a dyslexic ro bot I wonder ? > > > Nah, it's a Geordie dinghy. Hahaha nearly choked on me bath water then!!! :-)

Y not? Saves time surely ;-)

Is there much point to not really moving very far? You'll no doubt still b visiting/using the local ammenities and the edf...

And whats that? The "right thing" that is?

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Kel I'm quite surprised at your stance here. Even > if it does happen elsewhere, it's still > disgusting. And it would be disgusting in any > other area, this just happens to be the EAST > DULWICH FORUM, the clue is kinda in the name. > > ED - NAGAIUTB, harsh to accuse admin of being > spineless. Admin coukd find themselves in a dodgy > position if this dirty @#$%& saw his photo on > here. If you want to post the photo, you pay for a > forum off your own back and take the risks > involved. > > I agree the photo should be given to the police > though, and shared with the EDT. At no point have i suggested it is/was acceptable behaviour i just dont see the necessity to "gossip" about it as if its the first time anything of this kind has ever happened before or ever happened in ED before -for those doubting perhaps asking local bar staff of previous experience would settle those doubts. Its worse than curtain twitching and then to add the ridiculous comments thrown about referring to the assumption of thugs and low life only being capable of such behaviour... does anyone on here throwing these accusations know who this individual is that can back this up? Would the same thoughts be openly projected if thie individual was someone of a different "class" (as suggested by other posters)?

Did they actually say they couldnt be bothered?

ED - NAGAIUTB Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KalamityKel Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > oh now now your pathetic comments are really > not > > needed nor are they justified as attempts at > > personal insults towards myself. > > > > My point is why are certain participants making > an > > issue out of something that happens from time > to > > time. Yes it is annoying, disgusting blah blah > > blah but it's not like it's a regular occurance. > > > It happened. What are you expecting others to > do > > about it except stand around agreeing it's > > disgusting. > > > > Get grip! > > Wow, really classy response. You do realise that > you are effectively defending this chaps repugnant > behaviour, don't you? > > And that wasn't a personal attack on you at all, I > was merely assuming that you'd feel different if > it were to directly effect you. I guess the staff > of the EDT don't deserve your protection, lowly > bar types that they are... Are you serious? Completely serious? Wow!

Millhaven Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Really? In loads of places? Yes really. Ud b surprised at the state of the loos up town in particular those many would consider as "classy" establishments. Ppl urinatining in public or displaying their privates openly is also common place again up town but also in camberwell and even LL in the early hours of the morn after kicking out time. *shrugs*

oh now now your pathetic comments are really not needed nor are they justified as attempts at personal insults towards myself. My point is why are certain participants making an issue out of something that happens from time to time. Yes it is annoying, disgusting blah blah blah but it's not like it's a regular occurance. It happened. What are you expecting others to do about it except stand around agreeing it's disgusting. Get grip!

Erm... wots the big deal. Yes its not particularly pleasent but hardly front page news... it happens in loads of places. Oh hang on is it simply coz its ED that its shocking and completely out of order? Seriously! *sigh*

I'd love a break (not a holiday) from everything/everyone... I put my order in early with Santa but I don't think I've been good enough this year! snowboarder...what's a LED running jacket?

Many apologies in advance if I come across as rude or untactful... Is this any different from normal summer holidays? I mean, where do you usually go when going on hols? (assuming you do go away)

"Paul" aint to bright eh? :-))

"Favouritism" ... Pah! :p

sk1009 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > After my daughter told me what she had seen (which > she did so right away) I went outside instantly > trying to see if I could spot anyone wondering > around my street, but I didn't see anyone > suggesting that the guy had either run off or went > hiding somewhere after he saw my daughter. So in > response to those comments that say I should've > contacted 101, there really was no point in > calling the police when the person had disappeared > and no damage has been caused to my property. Not to report it? What a ridiculous comment to make. How are the police meant to be aware of potential crime if it's not reported even if there is nothing that could be done at the time. Crime prevention is key. What if, what you witnessed/heard from your daughter then resulted in someone else being burgled, robbed or worse? If the police do not know of troubled areas they can't patrol or keep an eye out. As a community we all have a responsibility to prevent crime where possible.

aquarius moon Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > So I guess the heating systems in the winter are > all associated with age also: > > 185/484/3/122 warm & cosy > > P12/P13/343 comfortable > > 37 you hope to reach the end of your journey > before frostbite sets in! > > Don't know about the 176 as I rarely use it. *"185/484/3/122 warm & cosy & really smelly in wet weather"*

10 years... did something happen then that made it different?

Erm... yes quite right raebel *insert sarcasm* I dont see that any action - whether a seat is offered or wanted by either side makes it in anyway sexist. If men were able to carry children would this be an issue? Besides anyone with a brain would recognise not just mum to be maybe needing a seat for various health reasons but also from a safety view fir unborn child.. travelling on public transport can be dangerous. Sudden jerks (movement from vehicle not passengers), and then the possibilty of others knocking into you... doesnt take a rocket scientist to see the potential risks. In the case of an mp in session not having a seat we werent there so dont really know what happened. Im sure HR or whatever equivalent would have made arrangments addressing situations like this. Whether someone chose to stand, for reasons perhaps as identified previously on this thread, or whether it was sheer pig headedness of colleagues (i know... strong possibility!) We cant say. To claim "sexism" over things like that? Its a shame more attention isnt given in proper sexist issues

Blimey that's some fall off ya bike to knock yourself out!

Is it not getting a bit late in the evening now for effective tort now?

*yawns*... think about it... it's hardly new news

a bit out dated no?

Do you have a reason to get out of bed? Think on it ;-)

unlurked Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Mick Mac Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Being what ? > > Something like an events licence is no longer > required if certain criteria are met. Do not know > the detail but no licence no fee no licence > application etc. Also smaller venues can have > bands that couldn't before. Not quite true and potentially a little misleading there unlurked - there are licences just not the entertainment licence as it once was. The type of places that do and have always had live music (places that have increased the level of interest) are those that have premises licences already which is a requirement to such establishments to have live music so I don't think you could attribute the licensing thing to what's going on in ED. Yes the "entertainment licence" isn't much in existence now there are other restraints on places to control any ol' venue doing what they like. I think the more identifiable reason for the increase and better choice of live events in the area is the effort many people have gone to to improve what's available. TheGooseIsOut is one example...