KalamityKel

Not particularly surprised at the stats although it's incredibly disappointing given the investment and centralisation of specialist departments. Over the last year or so my family has had appalling and also fantastic experiences with both Kings and Lewisham hospitals from A&E to specialist wards. I cannot understand why it has to be this way. Surely in today's world (perhaps an ideal world) a consistent positive approach can be demonstrated.

KC Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > When did it arrive? We still haven't received a > letter (on Chesterfield Grove)two weeks in to the > planning process. Have you received yours yet? ours came with yesterdays' post. Interesting... the consultation period on the letter ends on the 2nd March yet the website advises the 5th March. Which is it? MM I'm surprised at your attitude and disappointed. No one was complaining about the objection in the context you mean, it's the notification process which is wrong. The EDF, as you well know, is NOT an official means of communication set up by the council. Just because a few people happen to come on here and discuss a few local issues not everyone in the community is involved. In this instance the council are being slow in following their own procedures which is worrying some people. I'm sure if it was your good self involved in this whole marlarky your thoughts would be very different.

http://planningonline.southwark.gov.uk/DocsOnline/Documents/343672_1.pdf hardly enough info to warrant calling the comment from a "resident"

A BIG bag of mini cheddars and a cold can of "full fat" cherry coke didn't do me too bad the other morning... just the tummy tho i fink me brain is way past any quick fix solution ;-)

Dopamine1979 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > the-e-dealer Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > BHG doesnt say why she asks maybe he groped her > or > > dropped something valuable. > > She called him handsome. "handsome" is rare... ya know :p

https://www.facebook.com/groups/105594917610/

According to southwark planning 120 odd people have been sent consultation letters/notification on 7th feb... anyone actually recieved anything? Ive not nor neighbours... James barber- you've gone rather quiet on the matter...

Does it just work on hangovers or general rundown: /overworked/emotionally drained st!ttyness too? Now THAT would b a miracle cure!

EDL - When you search planning applications on the Southwark Council website nothing else comes up for 106 Lordship Lane nor any indication of appeal which would appear on the original application.

I would simply urge any forumite who are/will be effected by the proposals and objected to the last application - if you are still against the plans - to submit an objection to planning (or of course if you're in favour to say something too). You may have done so the last time but you need to do it again for this "new" application even if your concerns and comments are the same as before. It's very easy for those who don't live anywhere near to the site to fail to see the implications of the development as it is also easy to think you can't be bothered to go through it all again or think it's going to be passed by planning this time so there's no real point in doing anything - if you don't do anything then you'll only have yourselves to blame if it really does go through and you're not happy about it.

with prettier pictures and colours on the plans :-|

Details are now loaded http://planningonline.southwark.gov.uk/AcolNetCGI.exe?ACTION=UNWRAP&RIPNAME=Root.PgeDocs&TheSystemkey=9553324

jennyh Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It's hellish, now spending 2 hours a day > travelling to and from nursery in Dulwich. Have > tried so many routes but all lead into the same > few roads which are rammed!! Anyone got a secret > way? Have even tried going via nunhead but takes > ages too. TWO hours? Really? :-s

LadyNorwood Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You obviously didn't live near enough Annette > Curtain - it's a Lloyds Bank not a Barclays where > the staff know me by name (along with all the > other shops round here); I get the same treatment in HSBC on Victoria Street (Westminster) but I don't live there... dunno what that has to do with how wonderful (or not - depending on opinion) a particular area is if that what your point is? *shrugs*

if it's not been "validated" how/why is it displayed on the website?

first mate Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > James, > Thank you. How many residents requested the > brighter white lights, and were they all residents > on the road in question? Is it possible to see the > original submission- who was it sent to and when? > > I ask because having a bright white light shining > into the bedroom is going to be pretty oppressive > and may interfere with the sleep of some- the > lights are more or less at bedroom window height, > so perhaps this could also be taken into account > before a final decision is made? It is the sort of > issue that one would hope all the residents in the > street would be asked about. > > It is great that the issue of paving is being > addressed. Much of the existing paving is in good > order, it just needs to be lifted, the substrate > level adjusted and then relaid. The use of tarmac > looks awful and this breaks up really quickly and > does not work as a permanent solution. Simply > relaying existing paving would be the best way of > dealing with trip hazards. First mate the request was certainly submitted by residents of the street with the dark areas within the street the main focus of the request - in particular the alley ways, places where trees dominate the lighting area (blocking out light from the lamps). The street had been the target of several burglaries in a short space of time and it was felt that replacing lighting to slightly brighter than current would help act as future deterrent, hence the submitted request to the council. It is also currently noted that many residents would rather walk in the road which is better lit than the pavement not only to avoid the trip hazards from tree roots but to feel safer. I'm sure once the ball starts rolling with the implementation of the scheme and residents have been informed, that there will be an opportunity for input and discussion. This is/was, after all, based simply on an initial request for work to be done from a completed and submitted form from residents.

Interesting... who are the 124 neighbours that have been consulted? No one in the vicinity that's for sure! "Neighbours consulted on planning application 14/AP/0280 This page shows neighbours and local groups who have been consulted on the application. For details of how to comment on the application please click here. Application Details Documents Consultation Click here for statutory and internal consultees Total number of neighbours consulted: 124 Consultation Letter Sent Neighbour"

LN I think Otta was just generalising... You'd be surprised for a relatively "dead" forum that is WDF in comparison to here how many of those on this forum are also over on that one and not just in the names they use here.

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi KK, > I'm afraid I don't know about the Lister centre. > Bit away from East Dulwich. > Not THAT far away surely?! Would have thought it an important "secret" (not suggesting by you) being kept from the public...

James, whilst not a ED or ward issue this does effect all Southwark residents... There's rumours of the Lister drop in centre closing could you confirm either way? Would be interesting to know your views.

so choc aint a food eh? ... can't be bad then :))

so you haven't reported these nuisance (NOT malicious) calls at all? The police can approach the woman and go through various things especially establishing if she's ok and all that. I would have thought it being more responsible to report it than to ignore it - just say, in whatever confused state she may get herself into, there's one time when she really does need help and you aren't able to distinguish between normal calls and not normal calls? Having official awareness could make the difference. OR if you really don't want to get involved then have the number blocked on your phone.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The cheap glasses I stupidly bought from Tesco's > optician. Bits keep falling off. buying "expensive" ones are just as bad... minus the justification "well they were cheap what did I expect"

I'm more confused with marshmellows... what's the deal!?!

Tomdhu have you considered contacting the police? Surely this is the more mature approach rather than having a quite unnecessary cat fight on here (as it's sooo not as entertaining as you seem to think it is)?